Posted on 09/05/2023 7:14:03 PM PDT by logi_cal869
The public interest group Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections declared it had secured a “massive win” for election integrity following a Friday Arizona court ruling in its favor.
In March, RITE sued Democratic Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes arguing his office’s Elections Procedures Manual violates the law regarding the mail-inn ballot signature verification process.
“While state law requires county recorders to match mail-ballot signatures with signatures in the voter’s ‘registration record,’ the Secretary instructed them to use a broader and less reliable universe of comparison signatures,” the group said in a Monday news release.
“That means the Secretary was requiring ballots to be counted despite using a signature that did not match anything in the voter’s registration record. This was a clear violation of state law,” RITE asserted.
- snip -
The court said that the “statute is clear and unambiguous” requiring “the recorder to review the voter’s registration card” and not other documents with the voter’s signature.
Napper further noted, “There is no ambiguity in the statute or process.”
- snip -
“While state law requires county recorders to match mail-ballot signatures with signatures in the voter’s ‘registration record,’ the Secretary instructed them to use a broader and less reliable universe of comparison signatures,” the group said in a Monday news release.
“That means the Secretary was requiring ballots to be counted despite using a signature that did not match anything in the voter’s registration record. This was a clear violation of state law,” RITE asserted.
- snip -
The court said that the “statute is clear and unambiguous” requiring “the recorder to review the voter’s registration card” and not other documents with the voter’s signature.
Napper further noted, “There is no ambiguity in the statute or process.”
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...
Illegal elections
Broke state laws.
And we got Biden…..
So what’s the remedy?
Who knows, besides ‘updating their manual’. This case is exactly what Lake was crowing about and she got shot down by the AZ courts.
This group proved its case.
If it was up to me: Tar & feathers.
So here’s yet another proven case of election fraud perpetrated by a state government in a federal election.
Of course, an easy remedy would be to audit the mail-ins and do the job that the election official did not do by actually comparing the signatures. But we all know that the Uniparty will fight against that tooth and nail. The last thing RINOs want is MAGA candidates winning.
“Democratic Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes instructed county recorders to use a broader and less reliable universe of comparison signatures...the Secretary was requiring ballots to be counted despite using a signature that did not match anything in the voter’s registration record.”
Why am I still amazed and shocked at the brazen lawlessness of Democrats? This is really unbelievable. “Here, use this universe of signatures. Find one that matches.”
When is Fontes to report to the Yuma Territorial Prison?
That was my first thought as well. I was surprised that it hadn't been posted here.
Nothing. All existing results will stand bank it
“So what’s the remedy?”
That’s a very good question. My money says there isn’t one.
L
“In a Friday ruling rejecting a motion to dismiss the case filed by Fontes and the group Mi Familia Vota, Yavapai County Superior Court Judge John Napper agreed with RITE’s conclusion concerning the law.”
Expect this to be overturned with something like lack of standing.
The truth does not matter, only hiding the steal is important.
ping
When will RITE be indicted by Jack Smith for interfering with the election process by investigating it?
Boom!
Another AZ election item. Must be written by the same guy that won’t bar Trump from the ballot on Wednesday.
Your information tells me that Arizona never did a thorough analysis of the ballots. I thought we were told Arizona did a recount and it found that Trump got less votes.
There was a kind of protracted recount/audit, not sure the specific issues being examined. I do remember the state Senate told the senators behind the audit they wouldn’t defend them from lawsuits if the report said there was fraud.
The remedy? State election officials promise to do everything on the up and up and nobody needs to oversee it. We trust them, just like we did in 2020.
Ban speed readers, human or machine.
She acts like it too. I don’t know how this women ever got to be an elected official.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.