Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The new age of agitprop
Spiked ^ | Joel Kotkin

Posted on 09/05/2023 8:10:05 AM PDT by FarCenter

The mainstream media have abandoned the pursuit of objectivity and truth.

Are we living in a new age of agitprop? It is not unusual for journalism, culture and the arts to reflect the political bias of societies and individual writers. But in the past few decades, the business of providing information and insight has sharply deteriorated. Particularly at the elite level, the media now embrace an increasingly uniform point of view on issues as diverse as gender, race, the pandemic and climate.

To be sure, there still exists a vibrant oppositional press that offers divergent views. Nevertheless, so many mainstream media outlets increasingly resemble something closer to the kind of agitprop perfected by Russian Marxists, Lenin and their heirs. What was once a liberally minded industry, notes Michael Shellenberger, has embraced censorship as the one cure for what it defines as ‘misinformation’.

The results for consumers have been disastrous. In the new media world, all news coverage is geared towards upholding pre-established narratives. Actual reporting has become exceedingly rare. A 2019 report from think-tank Rand revealed that journalism is steadily moving away from a fact-based model and toward one dominated by opinion. The result is what Rand described as ‘truth decay’. This reflects a disappointing turn within a media industry that once proudly opposed existing power structures.

The rise of agitprop in the media is largely a result of increasing geographic, ideological and class uniformity. There has been a drastic change in the composition of the journalistic profession. Working-class reporters, many with ties to local communities, have been replaced by a more cosmopolitan and uniformly ‘progressive’ breed with college degrees. At schools like Columbia, aspiring journalists focus less on the fundamentals of reporting and more on openly advancing a ‘social justice’ agenda.

Many of these younger reporters, notes Pew, do not embrace the old ideas about objectivity and balance. And most tilt overwhelmingly to the ‘progressive’ side of politics. A survey in 2014 found that barely seven per cent of US reporters identified as Republicans. And according to some analyses, in 2018, some 97 per cent of all political donations from journalists went to Democrats.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agitprop; media; msm

1 posted on 09/05/2023 8:10:05 AM PDT by FarCenter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

bkmk


2 posted on 09/05/2023 8:10:41 AM PDT by sauropod (I will stand for truth even if I stand alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

starve the beast


3 posted on 09/05/2023 8:18:29 AM PDT by joshua c (to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter
Nevertheless, so many mainstream media outlets increasingly resemble something closer to the kind of agitprop perfected by Russian Marxists, Lenin and their heirs.

That's because that is exactly what they are.

4 posted on 09/05/2023 8:28:32 AM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sicon

I was briefly observing the old Mike Wallace “Biography” series, and his subject was Woodrow Wilson, one of our most wicked presidents. Criticism was minimal. This is the guy who gave us the Federal Reserve, the income tax, and admission to World War One.

Wallace’s tone was very professional. The reading and tone were exemplary. The Murrow’s and Cronkite’s of old were full throated liberals, but their tone and presentation could fool you because they were so good. Just ask Joe McCarthy or Goldwater or Nixon or Reagan.

Today’s media is full of screeching leftist maniacs who all but slobber and turn red. Their copy is loaded with repeated weasel words and bromides. “Cookie Face” Nicole Wallace recently impressed my wife who barely pays any attention, by loading the phrase, “disgraced former president” into her piece several times.

The media is an organ of the state. When they chased Nixon, they pretended not to be.


5 posted on 09/05/2023 8:43:19 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter
The results for consumers have been disastrous. In the new media world, all news coverage is geared towards upholding pre-established narratives. Actual reporting has become exceedingly rare. A 2019 report from think-tank Rand revealed that journalism is steadily moving away from a fact-based model and toward one dominated by opinion. The result is what Rand described as ‘truth decay’. This reflects a disappointing turn within a media industry that once proudly opposed existing power structures.

A few things about this:


6 posted on 09/05/2023 8:46:41 AM PDT by Dahoser (I finally figured out what to call him: Fakephonyfraudident Biden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
The media is an organ of the state. When they chased Nixon, they pretended not to be.

The media is Leftist activists and has been for my entire lifetime.

7 posted on 09/05/2023 8:46:55 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

They are both. Many have major connections to the government and the establishment. The establishment has always been the left.


8 posted on 09/05/2023 8:49:34 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

9 posted on 09/05/2023 9:07:40 AM PDT by MrBambaLaMamba (The only good commie is one that's dead - Country Joe McDonald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter
Enemedia's idol:

             

10 posted on 09/05/2023 10:34:19 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

The Leftists of 2023 were the “Loyalists” of the Revolutionary war.

Historians have estimated that between 15% and 20% (300,000 to 400,000) of the 2,000,000 whites in the colonies in 1775 were Loyalists (per Wiki).

*************************************************************

In today’s polls, you NEVER see a lefty idea/concept get less than 20% support. This means that about 400,000 lefties were around in the Revolutionary War and many of them signed up to fight the Patriots (like they do today in the streets and in the press). In fact “Loyalists” fighting along side the British once outnumbered the whole entire Patriot Army.

So, communist journalist’s in 2023 have, historically, a solid base to come from.

Now days it looks like about 35 to 40% of voters are hard core marxist, Loyalist, Democrats. So, the bastards have doubled their numbers in 248 years.


11 posted on 09/05/2023 10:44:20 AM PDT by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas
So, the bastards have doubled their numbers in 248 years.

They are experts in incrementalism and they've taken over most aspects of society with little opposition.

12 posted on 09/05/2023 10:46:56 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Good point!


13 posted on 09/05/2023 1:20:00 PM PDT by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson