Posted on 08/16/2023 9:06:25 AM PDT by Red Badger
The latest unsealed court filings shows that special counsel Jack Smith has all of President Donald Trump’s direct messages, including the deleted and unsent ones.
We learned last week that the feds served Twitter with a warrant for Trump’s account. The company resisted. The court then fined the platform $350,000 and held it in contempt.
The judge suspected Twitter wanted to delay the handover because CEO Elon Musk wanted “to cozy up” to Trump.
I rolled my eyes.
The government demanded everything. It seemed that no one in the room knew anything about the old fleets. Remember those? Twitter tried to copy Facebook/Instagram stories.
How can I take any of them seriously if they have no idea what they’re even asking for?
The court also told Twitter to include “searches on the platform surrounding the 2020 election, devices used to log into the account, IP addresses used to log into the account and a list of associated accounts.”
Hmmmm . He should consult with Hillary.
“How are Trump’s taxes going?”
I heard that the House investigators are now going to subpoena the Biden’s tax records for their bribery and corruption investigation.
Glad there is now precedent allowing Congress to access presidential tax records.
We have to know the democRATS have had moles around just to get information and decide how they could strew every tid-bit they could use to do what they are doing now. And some(RINOS) have been identified.
Not much different than the FBI trying to piece together a case against Al Capone.
And now they will be using these fake charges to cast such a wide net to gather co-conspirators.
Once they have the MAC address of a device, now let's see all of the places that he used the device to twit.
Then subpoena all of those places and all devices logged on there.
Good thing that there are Constitutional protections against such, except in certain criminal proceedings. /s
Jackboot Smith needs to be disbarred.
This is persecution, looking for a crime where no crime has been sworn to have happened. This is a violation of civil rights, his and ours.
“ GOP surrender monkeys are making a huge mistake in thinking the soviet machinery of lawfare won’t be turned against them”
———————————-
Correction - the GOP KNOW lawfare will be turned against and will WIN because of their own corruption. This explains their ‘do nothing’ behavior for decades.
I don’t suppose comrad Smith has volunteered his own tweets including the deleted and unsent ones.
To prosecute an American on the basis of this is like taxing a person for capital gains on investments without having profited from the sale.
Hah! There’s many an email I’ve typed up and deleted after re-reading them ;-)
____________________________________
I’ve sometimes deleted a sentence because I decided that’s not quite what I want to say. To think this can be captured and held against me is really chilling.
America has died we are living in the united socialist states of aMeriKa
That is exactly what the Dems want to do.
They want to tax your 'gains' on investments, including your IRAs and 401Ks, on unrealized profits that you have not actually received yet.
SO say your IRA or stock portfolio is worth, on paper, 25% more today that it was when you opened it, you would have to pay the 'tax' on the 25% increase.
But, curiously, you do not get to claim a 'loss' if the value declines 25%...................
An occupied territory.
Bkmk.
Reminds me of “XBOX chat room” logs and shared gmail passwords.
We are the crime. We the people who stand by the United States Constitution. We.
exactly. Thanks for the clarification. I wasn’t certain how to describe it. Thanks for filling in the blanks.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Some judge surely must have made a mistake and by that mistake made the evidence gathered useless to the prosecution.
When I was going through divorce, I would write a draft response to an email with all the flames I WISHED I could say. Then delete it and start over.
Can they prove President Trump, and not a staffer, typed and sent the messages.
Could have been Barron, or anyone
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.