Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voters will decide how changes are made to Ohio’s constitution in prelude to November abortion fight
Washington Times ^ | 8/7/23 | Tom Howell Jr.

Posted on 08/07/2023 2:06:01 PM PDT by cotton1706

Ohio voters will decide Tuesday whether future changes to the state constitution require a simple majority or 60% support, a decision that will have a major impact on a November fight over a pro-choice abortion measure.

Buckeye State voters will be asked in the fall whether a “fundamental right to reproductive freedom” should be added to the constitution as states navigate the fallout from the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade.

But Republican lawmakers scheduled an undercard fight this summer.

If “Issue 1” passes, it would make it harder for pro-choice advocates to lock in abortion rights through a constitutional amendment because changes will require a greater measure of support than polls suggest they can muster.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: elections
If you live in Ohio, go vote tomorrow!

And vote YES!

1 posted on 08/07/2023 2:06:01 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

I’m sure all the white liberal women will be out in droves for this one.


2 posted on 08/07/2023 2:22:12 PM PDT by woweeitsme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woweeitsme

not necessarily all liberal.


3 posted on 08/07/2023 2:23:43 PM PDT by ronniesgal (The bidens are actually more white trashy than the Clintons, and that's sayin' something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: woweeitsme

Every woman who’s having sex outside marriage with “conservative” men will be voting with them. Fornication has consequences.


4 posted on 08/07/2023 2:31:10 PM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

A constitution that can be changed by a majority vote is not a constitution at all


5 posted on 08/07/2023 2:40:47 PM PDT by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

I’d vote yes. But remember this goes both ways. What if republicans decide to add an amendment that says children have to be 18 to get hormone therapy. It would need 60 percent as well.


6 posted on 08/07/2023 2:48:10 PM PDT by napscoordinator (DeSantis is a beast! Florida is the freest state in the country! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

And? I don’t see the problem. Constitutional amendments shouldn’t be made lightly.


7 posted on 08/07/2023 3:31:37 PM PDT by sam_whiskey (Peace through Strength. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

Agreed. Laws become whimsies. Society devolves into chaos.
Democracy= Mob rule


8 posted on 08/07/2023 4:08:35 PM PDT by griswold3 (Truth, Beauty and Goodness )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

I’ll vote yes, but issue 1 will be soundly defeated.

Classic Republican move. Clumsy, poorly planned effort that could have been handled years ago in a proper election cycle. Now roe v wade is overturned and they are caught flat footed. As always. Eff ‘em.


9 posted on 08/07/2023 4:55:35 PM PDT by americas.best.days... ( Donald John Trump has pulled the sword from the stone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americas.best.days...

Plus, the state constitution has been the same for a century. Now, hysteria. Whatever.


10 posted on 08/07/2023 4:56:30 PM PDT by americas.best.days... ( Donald John Trump has pulled the sword from the stone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

☑️


11 posted on 08/07/2023 4:59:08 PM PDT by Varsity Flight ( See"War by🙏🙏 the prophesies set before you." I Timothy 1:18. Nazarite prayer warriors. 10.5.6.5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I don’t object to a high threshold for constitutional changes. I think there should be one. Because they’re using the 50% referendum as and end-run around the bicameral lawmaking process, which they deem as too difficult, as intended.


12 posted on 08/07/2023 4:59:12 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson