Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ request protective order in Trump's election fraud case over social media posts
Fox News ^ | Aug 5, 2023 | Landon Mion

Posted on 08/05/2023 4:48:53 AM PDT by McGruff

The Justice Department on Friday urged a federal judge overseeing former President Trump's election fraud case to issue a protective order against the former president after he made social media posts the department argues are threatening.

Prosecutors asked U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan to issue a protective order in the case a day after Trump pleaded not guilty to charges of attempting to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in his favor and block the peaceful transition of power. The protective order would limit the information Trump and his legal team would be allowed to share publicly about the case.

Protective orders like this are common in criminal cases, but prosecutors said it's "particularly important" in this case because Trump has posted on social media about "witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dissent; doj; dojweaponization; donatedonaldtrump; donatetrump; freespeech; harassment; persecution; trump; trumpindictment; trumppersecution; weaponizeddoj; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 08/05/2023 4:48:53 AM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Any comments from our lawyer friends here on FR? Emergency 1st Amendment challenge at the SC?


2 posted on 08/05/2023 4:53:07 AM PDT by silent majority rising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Desperate times, calls for desperate measures, I guess.


3 posted on 08/05/2023 4:53:33 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

24x7 litigation


4 posted on 08/05/2023 4:54:37 AM PDT by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everyone

Intimidating witness? That’s what the government does best.


5 posted on 08/05/2023 4:55:27 AM PDT by McGruff (Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*** things up - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

DOJ and FBI: Fascists at work. Perhaps they are taking lessons from Woke Disney Corp and whistle while they work.
(How’s that for a totalitarian’s three-ball combination? FBI, DOJ and Disney!)


6 posted on 08/05/2023 5:07:23 AM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Truth used to be an absolute defense. PDJT is just stating the truth. Obviously the DOH-J can’t handle it.


7 posted on 08/05/2023 5:13:06 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (Ephesians 6:10 - 18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter

Truth is the new “Hate Speech”!


8 posted on 08/05/2023 5:18:33 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (“Who is John Galt?”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

DOJ requests to stop Free Speech in it’s Trump Free Speech case.


9 posted on 08/05/2023 5:18:44 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
And obviously a danger to our “democracy”…..heh
10 posted on 08/05/2023 5:19:52 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (Ephesians 6:10 - 18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
Funny they are providing the same for the SC justices.

This is unfettered, in your face lawfare.

11 posted on 08/05/2023 5:25:24 AM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

But of course. He’s already being charged for exercising his first amendment rights, so why wouldn’t they continue down that same path.


12 posted on 08/05/2023 5:25:51 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

I wouldn’t be surprised if this is a planned action by the Trump team. The judge would basically be ordering Trump to be unable to defend himself, even while the prosecution is leaking details to the press. Trump could then immediately appeal such an order all the way to the Supreme Court and be able to delay the trial indefinitely.


13 posted on 08/05/2023 5:26:18 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The power of the press is not in what it includes, rather, it's in that which is omitted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

The only person whose physical safety is in question is Trump.


14 posted on 08/05/2023 5:34:00 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Two Words: BANANA REPUBLIC!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Anyone that knows Trump knows he doesn’t mean a physical confrontation of any kind...he means he’s gonna sue the right back.


15 posted on 08/05/2023 5:36:13 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

This is the tipping point. They feel invincible. They will not let up until our side fights back. Many will not survive what’s coming.


16 posted on 08/05/2023 5:42:28 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

You can tell when Trump is speaking truth, the government and media go nuts over it. He’s over the target.


17 posted on 08/05/2023 5:46:01 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA (The Delay Trump’s trial, delay. Elect Trump President. Trump pardons himself. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silent majority rising

“Any comments from our lawyer friends here on FR? Emergency 1st Amendment challenge at the SC?”

Well, let’s see. The Judge worked for a firm of which coke head Biden was part of. That calls for immediate recusal and if not, removal from the bench for violating Trump’s civil rights. As a matter of fact, any DA, judge or counsel who is actively participating in this who has ties to Biden, Garland or the DOJ should recuse themselves or face Bar Association disbarment procedures. Unfortunately you need Rethuglicans with a spine to do that.


18 posted on 08/05/2023 5:49:23 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (The Democrat Party - Dumbing Down America Since 1965.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
--- "...posts the department argues are threatening.

How can a department in the federal system with so much power feel "threatened?" Simple. Exposing the corruption is THE THREAT to the corrupt.

19 posted on 08/05/2023 5:51:01 AM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson