Posted on 07/28/2023 6:43:34 AM PDT by Morgana
Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy said he will not sign a federal abortion ban to protect unborn babies even though he is “personally pro-life.”
A businessman and author, Ramaswamy has described himself as “unapologetically pro-life,” but his comments July 21 on the All-In Podcast conflict with the pro-life mission.
Although he believes “unborn life is life,” Ramaswamy said a limit or ban on killing unborn babies at the federal level would not be “principled” because abortion is an issue for the states.
“I would not support a federal abortion ban of any kind on principled ground,” he told the All-In Podcast. “Because to me, I am grounded in constitutional principles and I think there’s no legal basis for the federal government to legislate. The 10th Amendment says that part of the American experiment is that we have diversity across states, and I think this is a states issue.”
Ramaswamy said he is “open to persuasion” if a constitutional scholar convinces him otherwise, but right now, if elected president, he would not sign a law to limit or ban abortions. However, he did say the U.S. Supreme Court was correct to overturn Roe v. Wade, and states should be allowed to protect unborn babies’ lives.
“I’m personally a believer that unborn life is life,” he continued, before criticizing the pro-life movement for not doing enough to help families in need.
“I think the pro-life movement needs to walk the walk,” Ramaswamy said, emphasizing his commitment to supporting contraception, adoption, childcare, sexual responsibility and responsible fatherhood. If people on both sides of the debate can work together on these issues, he said abortion should not be “as divisive as we’ve made it out to be.”
This is not the first time Ramaswamy has opposed a federal ban on killing unborn babies in abortions. Earlier this month, he told Fox News that abortion “is an issue for the states,” and he does not believe the federal government should be involved.
His comments on abortion begin at 1:26:37 of the video below.
REACH PRO-LIFE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE! Advertise with LifeNews to reach hundreds of thousands of pro-life readers every week. Contact us today.
Other candidates who have announced Republican presidential bids include former Presidential Donald Trump, former Vice President Mike Pence, former North Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, U.S. Sen. Tim Scott and North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum.
The American people do not support abortions up to birth, paid for with their tax dollars, which is the position of President Joe Biden. Numerous polls show strong public opposition to taxpayer funding for elective abortions and strong public support for laws that limit abortions, especially after the first trimester.
Exactly. The Federal government has no say in the issue.
I do know if he has ever been to India. He certainly never really lived there. He is from Ohio.
OK - you’re done.
Same here. We don’t want a nanny state as powerful as the United States growing its tentacles.
The way to handle the abortion issue in the long term is by changing the hearts and minds of men and women, not by imposing oppressive, iron-fisted federal laws.
I agree
Do NOT know if he has ever been to India
There is no way any candidate advocating for a Federal Ban on Abortion will win a National Election, even if the voters agree with them on every other issue.
He did not say that and you know it.
Bye
State issue. Leave as SCOTUS decided.
Federalism decreases civil war chances.
Let California be Cali.
Oklahomans be Okies.
Forcing federal regulations making every state same is what causes the turmoil.
People can move to states more friendly to their lifestyle.
“The 10th Amendment says that part of the American experiment is that we have diversity across states, and I think this is a states issue.”
Ramaswamy said he is “open to persuasion” if a constitutional scholar convinces him otherwise, but right now, if elected president, he would not sign a law to limit or ban abortions. However, he did say the U.S. Supreme Court was correct to overturn Roe v. Wade, and states should be allowed to protect unborn babies’ lives.
“I’m personally a believer that unborn life is life,”
I can’t find anything here to disagree with.
Clever politician speak.
I will stand for/against something that has 0.00013% chance of ever occurring in real life.
It is called sarcasm. Look it up.
Totally Moot Point by Vivek.
The big pharma grifter is slowly but surely being exposed for the scam he is. Cant believe so many here fell for this huckster. VP contender? GTFO!
So you want the federal govt to run your life? You want them to have MORE power?
“It’s a State issue, period.”
“Lot’s of Democrats said the same thing about slavery.”
That’s why we had the 13th amendment to the Constitution. A Constitutional amendment to ban abortion would be legal.
Yep, a losing statement from both sides.
Conservatives won’t like it for obvious reasons. The left won’t be placated because they don’t believe even states should have a say.
Well, he just lost my vote.
Sarcasm? Better, slander. Better yet lying.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.