God tells you his pronouns, and you want to dead name him.
But if he's saying God meets some kind of non-binary, pedo-grooming, hedonist standard then -- nope.
Ah, modern times. Most politicians, clergy, CEOs...et al. Wipe them out. All of them. (to paraphrase Emperor Palpetine)
He didn't come to make peace or protect the feelings of this misguided prelate.
Further, not everyone who claims to follow Christ has anything to do with Christ. Also, plain Bible teaching.
For example, baptism. It's essential to be saved. But, what is it? It's is a burial. The word itself means to "dip, immerse, plunge." The Ethiopian eunuch was baptized by Philip the Evangelist. (Acts 8) They both "went down into the water."
Sprinkling is not baptism. Pouring is not baptism. No person who has substituted either of those for baptism have, in fact, been baptized. Hence, are not following Christ. Hence, are not saved.
The list goes on and the individual referenced in the OP, sure, the Lord's prayer is a problem. But, for him, following Christ is a problem because he does not follow Christ. Never has.
Matt 7:21-23: Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
Leftists ruin everything.
So this guy thinks he’s smarter than Jesus.
The Founders were correct, we did need to disestablish from this.
Is this where I can say: "She has her panties in a knot over nothing."
Is God saying that He prefers Shakespeare to say Hemingsway's style of writing?
First they allow women pastors. Then a “Christian” leader calls something problematic. Then the sheep follow this demonically influenced leader. Then governments step in. Then oppression of followers of Jesus sets in. The demonic leaders rejoice.
It’s the archbishop’s opinion. It’s OK, everybody has one. I, for instance, find the archbishop problematic.
The Church of England started because Henry VIII couldn’t get the Pope to grant him a divorce from his legal wife, Catherine of Aragon. So he started a church, made himself head of it, divorced her, exiled Queen Catherine, when she died would not let her be buried as a Queen, couldn’t get an heir to the throne from his second wife either, Ann Boleyn, beheaded her, cheated on all of them anyway, on and on...
That was the beginning of a church that now has an Archbishop saying the Our Father prayer, instructed to us from Jesus, is wrong.
I am always glad when an elightened cleric comes along and sets us straight on the errors committed by the church for the past 2000 years, including those committed by Jesus himself.
I believe the attendance in the C of E is something less than 5% of the population, so we are getting close to an “if a tree falls in the woods and there is no one to hear it...” moment.
The only problem with praying The Lord’s Prayer is that it is unnecessary to pray “Thy Kingdom Come”.
It’s already here.
I think the title "archbishop" is problematic when a moron like Stephen Cottrell has it.
The Episcopal “church” is a cult. Glad I left 20 years ago.
The serpent in the Garden is still active today.
“According to one female Anglican priest, …….”
I think we found the problem.