If I see a man wearin' a blue helmet I shoot the man wearin' it!
Posted on 07/04/2023 7:19:52 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The proposal might be the biggest attempted power grab in the history of the United Nations. If approved, the United States as we know it could cease to exist.
In September 2024, less than two months before the next U.S. presidential election, the United Nations will host a landmark “Summit of the Future,” where member nations will adopt a Pact for the Future. The agreement will solidify numerous policy reforms offered by the U.N. over the past two years as part of its sweeping Our Common Agenda platform.
Although there are numerous radical proposals included in the agenda, perhaps none are more important than the U.N. plan for a new “emergency platform,” a stunning proposal to give the U.N. significant powers in the event of future “global shocks,” such as another worldwide pandemic.
Many of the details of the U.N. emergency platform were laid out in a March 2023 policy paper titled “Strengthening the International Response to Complex Global Shocks — An Emergency Platform.” In the paper, the U.N. secretary-general writes, “I propose that the General Assembly provide the Secretary-General and the United Nations system with a standing authority to convene and operationalize automatically an Emergency Platform in the event of a future complex global shock of sufficient scale, severity and reach.”
Once triggered, the emergency platform would give the U.N. the ability to “actively promote and drive an international response that places the principles of equity and solidarity at the centre of its work.” The U.N. would bring together the “stakeholders” of the world, including academics, governments, private sector actors, and “international financial institutions” to ensure there is a unified, global response to the crisis.
The emergency platform would also give the United Nations the power to “Ensure that all participating actors make commitments that can contribute meaningfully to the...”
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...
By then, I don’t expect to be seeing Uncle Joe still at the helm.
Gov. Gavin Newsom, will the nation see you in Sept. 2024?
Don’t sell us out, as I suspect you would happily do for more PC points.
Don’t fence us in!
can we all just say no?
Would this be considered a treaty?
“For the treaty to succeed, two-thirds of senators must vote in support, giving treaties a high bar for passage. The Senate does not ratify treaties themselves, in any case. If passed, the resolution goes back to the executive branch, and it is then ratified between the United States and the foreign entity.”
https://stennis.gov/the-role-of-congress-in-adopting-international-treaties/
Yes. As in post #2.
The article says Biden supports this. However, unless the Senate ratifies it, it is not worth the paper it is printed on, just like the Iran deal, Paris Accord, Kyoto treaty, etc..
Oh boy.
It will be ratified in 2024, because they’ve been working hiding their for the past four years.
How many infantry divisions does the UN have again?
Translation: POCs will rule the world and evil whites are be exterminated.
However, The Constitution gives to the Senate the sole power to approve, by a two-thirds vote, treaties negotiated by the executive branch.
So are you saying the Republicans are going agree to ratify this?
Signed, U.N.
If I see a man wearin' a blue helmet I shoot the man wearin' it!
Ye haw!
First, how many Republicans are globalists? Can you trust the Mitt Romneys of the party to not make a fatal stab at the country if they think they are without accountability for their actions because the US will be managed from the outside if this becomes ratified?
Second, as I mentioned, they’ve had a further 4 years to refine their cheating to become even more undetectable, along with how many more millions of Third worlders that are just waiting to take over?
I believe that the Senate would have to ratify this action because it sounds like a treaty. I’m not sure that the Senate would do the right thing however.
Of course. It’s the only way they can still force their agenda without the consent of the governed. See Canada.
Because those grifting little freaks do so well in their own dirty 3rd world crap holes.
[as part of its sweeping Our Common Agenda platform.]
The Liberal New World Order?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.