Posted on 06/23/2023 9:52:48 AM PDT by CFW
A former New Hampshire state representative and the nation’s first transgender-identifying state lawmaker was arrested by police this week and charged for allegedly distributing child pornography.
Stacie Marie Laughton, a Democrat who previously resigned twice from the New Hampshire state house, is now facing four counts of distributing sexually explicit images of children. Laughton was born Barry Charles Laughton, Jr.
Nashua Police Department public information officer Sgt. John Cinelli said that police were called to respond to a juvenile incident on Tuesday and were then told that the former lawmaker had been distributing explicit images. On Thursday, police searched Laughton’s house and arrested him.
“They spoke with reporting parties that indicated Laughton distributed sexually explicit images of children,” Cinelli said, according to Patch. “Detectives from the special investigations division were assigned to further the investigation. They applied for and were granted a warrant for Laughton’s arrest.”
Laughton is slated to be arraigned on Friday at the Hillsborough County Superior Court-South.
The 39-year-old has been plagued by repeated legal troubles in the past. In 2008, he was convicted of credit card felony, according to the New Hampshire Union-Leader. In 2012, Laughton became the first transgender-identifying person elected as a state lawmaker, thrilling LGBT activists.
“I believe that at this point, the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) community will hopefully be inspired,” Laughton said at the time. “My hope is that now maybe we’ll see more people in the community running, maybe for alderman. Maybe in the next election, we’ll have a senator.”
Shortly after the election, Laughton stepped down after the credit card fraud allegations came to light. Laughton was later sentenced to six months in jail after reporting a bomb threat to a hospital in 2015. In July 2021, Laughton was arrested for giving police false information.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailywire.com ...
This is what I cannot understand. People, a lot of people, knew about this guy’s character and still voted for him. This is why I fear for the republic.
“Are we not men?”
Well, I’ll be a Monkey’s Uncle!
Hmm...”Stacie” has a five o’clock shadow and - dare I say it? - male pattern baldness. I could probably get in trouble for misgendering that dome...
WOOF!
Simply being a tranny got him the job. Democrats are the party of pervs.
I watched that video. The females in the classroom are disgusting. I could not make it on a college campus today. No way.
The “dirty little secret” of the LuGBuT cabal is “P”, the letter they never include.
“Stacie” is no skinny dude in a dress claiming to be a woman as Tucker famously characterized transgenders.
I suspect it doesn’t drink light beer but needs to.
Disgusting half human piece of $hit...... He should have rainbows draping from him to remind everyone how sick these SOBs are......
elected by voters.
Its a strong argument against democracy.
Its why our founders created the Constitution - with strict limits on what government can do (which is unfortunately now being dismantled)
He’s just a man pretending to be a woman.
Indeed.
Amen 🙏🏻!!!!
Leaving this latest aside, Dem voters kept voting this thing in. Credit card fraud and bomb threats and yet they complain about the idiot from New York.
Candidate for 3-S treatment?
I agree with you. Those who really do suffer from gender dysphoria belong in hospital treatment facilities, while those pretending, do belong in prions.
For, I further believe those falsely claiming to be transgender, do so in order to escape scrutiny for their true perversions, and to gain access to various areas that men have always been refused entry, for the privacy of women. They also gain access to children to entertain children as Drag Queens. Any parent who takes their children to Drag Queen shows, should be under the same intense scrutiny that these perverts should be under.
The transgender mafia, along with politicians & the press, have made for conditions that put them in a class to be revered as some sort of hero victim classification who have been denied their rights. Which is all nonsense, and why people are starting to fight back against this nonsense.
This is all done with one goal. To destroy this nation.
“In 2008, he was convicted of credit card felony...”
Wow, they actually referred to him as a “him”. Is it possible that reality is coming back into vogue?
I love that the article is correctly using “he” to refer to this nasty perv.
Shocking!
/s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.