CDC confirms heart disease risk soars 13,200 percent among vaccinated Risk of myocarditis 133 times greater than background population

slaynews.com ^ | 6/15/2023 | Frank Bergman

[rktman]

A bombshell study from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has confirmed that the risk of autoimmune heart disease is 13,200% higher in people who are vaccinated for Covid.

The study found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA Covid vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the population.

The study was conducted by the CDC, FDA, and researchers from several top U.S. universities and hospitals.

Researchers examined the effects of vaccination with products manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.

They found that Covid shots increase the risk of suffering myocarditis by 13,200%.

The study’s authors used data obtained from the CDC’s VAERS reporting system.

The data was then cross-checked to ensure the results complied with the CDC’s definition of myocarditis.

The researchers also noted that given the passive nature of the VAERS system, the number of reported incidents is likely to be an underestimate of the extent of the phenomenon.

1626 cases of myocarditis were studied.

[one guy in new jersey]

Might we be forgiven now for deleting the word/term “professional” from the phrase “medical professional” and inserting a more appropriate appellation?

I have a few ideas but would be interested to hear from others what term should henceforth be used?

[one guy in new jersey]

Where is Fewry and DiscoDug?

[Melinda in TN]

One of the home health nurses that took care of my husband said that her husband and his best friend both developed myocarditis after taking the boosters. She said neither she nor her husband will take another one even if she loses her job.

I’d like to see a link to the CDC’s statement on this to show to people. I know the vax is dangerous and neither of us took it, but our family members did.

[verum ago]

So, I'm reading the actual linked study, and the stated increases in risk of 13,200 % and 133x appear nowhere in it. I have no idea how the article authors got that.

The highest increase in risk I can find was for males age 18-24, who saw an increase of 1.76 cases per million doses, which, assuming most in that age group got 2 doses, gives an increase of about 3.52 per million persons. The background rate of myocarditis is usually stated as around 10 per 100,000 annually (or 100 per million), so that's an increased risk of 3.52%.

That's definitely a significant increase, especially given how little risk Covid-19 itself poses to that demographic! But I still have no idea where the article's stated numbers came from.

One part I would like to point out, from the study:

First, the greater frequency noted among vaccine recipients aged 12 to 29 years vs those aged 30 years or older was similar to the age distribution seen in typical cases of myocarditis. This pattern may explain why cases of myocarditis were not discovered until months after initial Emergency Use Authorization of the vaccines in the US (ie, until the vaccines were widely available to younger persons). Second, the sex distribution in cases of myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination was similar to that seen in typical cases of myocarditis; there is a strong male predominance for both conditions.

Translation: DUH! The people who were most at risk of myocarditis weren't the demographic initially studied, and therefore that risk wasn't initially observed. But the bump in myocarditis cases could absolutely have been anticipated by anyone with two braincells, and the vax defenders who (at the time) were defending the numbers were misinformed at best, or actively disingenuous at worst. Given their documented behavior since, I'm going with the disingenuous option...

[Raycpa]

At 13200% wouldn’t everyone be dead ?

Something not right about the math. Is author capable of interpreting study?

[volunbeer]

Correct me if I am wrong, but on many big tech platforms you would NOT be allowed to quote this article and still get the “safe and effective” tag if you were not blocked for simply repeating this.

[Skwor]

The headline percentage is not supported by the article as far as I can tell. That is why in my forum post I linked the actual study. The increase is absolutely significant and was predictable, no need to sensationalize it.

[volunbeer]

I have not had enough coffee but that number seems big too unless you consider that myocarditis was very rare in young people with less than 2 per 100,000 prior to “Covid”.

It is not so rare now.

[roving]

They are still around. They are picky on which post they will comment on. They will pass on this one

[momincombatboots]

But, as trump said in iOS a couple weeks ago… everyone wanted the shots. He is still backing his big pharma blank check signature. Just criminal aiding and abetting the big pharma death cult.

[bray]

It says in the article 133 times more than those unvaxed.

[volunbeer]

I don’t think it is either. However, by any metric the risk of myocarditis is higher than the risk from Covid for young people so it is true that the vaccine caused more harm than the virus and as other nations have concluded this should NOT be administered to them.

Our government is still recommending this shot for children. You don’t have to be a “scientist” or know your way around white papers to understand how wrong this is.

[VTenigma]

BFL

[VTenigma]

Good thing all the commercial pilots in the U.S. were forced to get vaxxed, it makes flying much safer now. Oh wait.

[rktman]

😁👍. 🔬🤔😵🚫😷💉🐎💩

[rktman]

Facts? We don’t need no steenkin’ facts. I can neither confirm or deny the numbers attributed to the article. 🤔👍

[Grampa Dave]

The 13200% does not appear to be in the actual study.

I would like to see how that is derived.

Not that I am a vax advocate, mind you. #PureBlood.

---

I haven’t finished my first cup of coffee yet. This was all that I found so far:

Conclusions re Covid Vaccination:

Based on passive surveillance reporting in the US, the risk of myocarditis after receiving mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines was increased across multiple age and sex strata and was highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males and young men. This risk should be considered in the context of the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788346

[TexasGator]

Linked study: 50-100 cases per million

General population: 90 cases per million

COVID: 1500 cases per million

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7035e5.htm

[rktman]

Vaxxes and boosters rec’d by Mr and Mrs rktman.....ZERO! Just sayin’. 🔬🤔😵🚫😷💉🐎💩

[chickenlips]

You’re right, this can’t be true.

It’s not like the vax was medical technology that had never been able to get approval for anything. Or one that failed miserably as a therapeutic and was then offered as a vax.

And it wasn’t like it was rushed to market at warp speed without adequate testing or anything.

And if Donald J Trump said “The vaccine is one of the greatest achievements of mankind,” it damn well is and it’s absolutely 100% safe. He’s never uses hype or hyperbole. We can trust when he said “I came up with a vaccine, with three vaccines all are very, very good,” and being as humble as Hannity, it’s probably an understatement of just how good and safe they are! Anyone saying the it isn’t is a globalist, RINO loser.

Besides no one was forced to take it to keep a job or attend school or anything like that.

Oh wait.....! /s