Posted on 06/13/2023 8:57:46 AM PDT by george76
A study conducted by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration has shown that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the population.
This means Covid vaccination increases the risk of suffering myocarditis, an autoimmune disease causing inflammation of the heart, by 13,200%.
...
The study, conducted by researchers from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) as well as from several U.S. universities and hospitals, examined the effects of vaccination with products manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.
The study’s authors used data obtained from the CDC’s VAERS reporting system which were cross-checked to ensure they complied with CDC’s definition of myocarditis; they also noted that given the passive nature of the VAERS system, the number of reported incidents is likely to be an underestimate of the extent of the phenomenon.
1626 cases of myocarditis were studied, and the results showed that the Pfizer-BioNTech product was most associated with higher risk, with 105.9 cases per million doses after the second vaccine shot in the 16 to 17 age group for males, and 70.7 cases per million doses after the second shot in the 12 to 15 age group for males. The 18 to 24 male age group also saw significantly higher rates of myocarditis for both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s products (52.4 and 56.3 cases per million respectively).
...
The study found that the median time to symptom onset was two days, and that 82 percent of cases were in males, consistent with previous studies. Around 96 percent of affected people were hospitalised, with most treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; 87 percent of those hospitalised had resolution of symptoms by time of discharge.
...
At the time of data review, two reports of death in people younger than 30 years of age with potential myocarditis still remained under investigation and were not included in the case counts.
Among the reported symptoms were: chest pain, pressure, or discomfort (89%), shortness of breath (30%), abnormal ECG results (72%), and abnormal cardiac MRI findings (72%).
The study’s authors noted that myocarditis following vaccination appeared to resolve more swiftly than in typical viral cases; however, given that vaccination is no longer considered a reliable way in which to avoid COVID infection, it is unclear whether this has any specific relevance to the cost-benefit analysis of COVID vaccination, especially considering the low risk of complications following coronavirus infection for the age group most at risk for heart-related complications following vaccination.
Given the plethora of studies confirming a link between vaccination and myocarditis, the CDC has commenced active surveillance of adolescents and young adults to monitor their progress following heart-related incidents after vaccination. Long-term outcome data, however, are not yet available.
In the meantime, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology advise that people with myocarditis should refrain from competitive sports for three to six months, and only resume strenuous exercise after normal ECG and other test results are obtained. In addition, they advise that further mRNA vaccine doses should be deferred.
In conclusion, the study’s authors note that the risk of myocarditis after receiving mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines was increased across multiple age and sex strata and was highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males and young men, and that this risk should be considered in the context of the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination.
Whoopsie doodle.
THIS has to get out to the people, they need to be mad as hell. That’s the only way there will be justice.
The Geobbels Media will ignore it, of course.
so this admission (very old news to us) is from the CDC. fine, then why hasn’t the jab been pulled of the market and all mrna based gene therapies stopped?
“when there was covid-19 but no jab yet”
You make a good point. Although I only copied part of it ...
I meant that is a good way to do the control groups before there was the vax. As you said, many had covid but didn’t know it. I guess an antibody test could be done, but do those stick around forever?
There are SO many tests that need to be done and data to be gathered - and it’s all being ignored. Criminal.
Where are all the science is god FR covid vax worshipers? I figured they would be here to question the study, the source and tell all us unvaccinated, we were flat earthers and doomed for early deaths.
Forgive my comments, but I had a belly full of their arrogance and condescension when the jab was being treated as our savior.
The CDC, which is the property of Big Pharma, swore that the poison vax was safe and effective.
The FDA, which is the property of Big Pharma, swore that the poison vax was safe and effective.
I don't know....Lemmings come to mind.
But I'm old and they do not think like me.
What's next?
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788346
If that article describes a 13,200% increased risk of myocarditis, I did not see it. The overall risk for post-vaccination myocarditis looks low.
How do we know that these heart issues are not simply a side effect of having Covid ? It’s hard to distinguish whether it’s the vax, or Covid that’s causing this… since the vast majority of people had both (vax and Covid)
It’s the classic stat trick… the % increase is huge… but the risk is still VERY small. It used to be exceedingly rare, now it’s just rare.
The Covid Nazis used this trick often
Because the scale involved. 13,200% increase in study of jab. By contrast from an article I found about relative heart problems in total US population from 2019 to 2020, there was an 11% increase. That 11% could certainly be due to other factors, for instance stress at losing one's source of income due to lockdowns. Loneliness. Isolation. Depression. But with an 13,200% increase...well come on.
I agree. There was some schlemiel on here berating me because I and my family refused to get the shot. You’d think I was actively trying to kill him the way he whined.
And like you say, where is he now? Where’s the apology for threatening people like us who refused to take part in their experiment?
I’ve said it before but COVID and the jab revealed the true depth of character in so many people. For better and for worse.
And I will not forget the ones who embraced their Inner Hitler when given license to abuse other people.
Sorry. But that’s not proof. It could take time for the effects to kick in.
There should be data available among people with no vax, but having Covid. That’s the money comparison.
God lets people have what they want even if it’s not good for them. Not trump’s fault - he didn’t intentionally deceive like Fauci, Birx, media, etc. Trump mentioned hydroxy and ivermectin. Each person made their own choice - correction each adult did, many kids were led to whatever comes of their shots by their parents, God have mercy.
If 13,000% percent is not proof, and 11% is proof then you have interesting standards.
I simply want to know the truth. I’m not going to accept the headline grabbing claim from a “study” of unknown quality. Despite the 13,200% increase, the odds of having such heart issues is very low. We can’t just leap to the conclusion that the SHOTS caused it, and not Covid, because the numbers increased in 2021 more than 2020. There were many more US Covid cases in 2021, and we have no idea how long it might take for such symptoms to show up.
There ARE ways to know the truth. Thus study didn’t look at them, as best I can tell.
At my work today I noticed I could not get to the dashboard of an AWS application I am responsible for. To figure out if it was a problem with my computer or our network as opposed to a general problem on AWS I went to a web site where people self report problems with AWS. It looked like the VAERs chart...had a flat line of low levels of reports then an unmistakable huge spike orders of magnitude larger. Thus I knew it was not local. I did no study. It was self reporting. Not double blind. Not “scientific”. It did not tell me exactly how many people had problems...just how many went to that site to report it. But there is about zero doubt that AWS was having serious issues because of the scale. Even if disreputable journalist reported the increase in a headline it would still be very conclusive evidence. Even if Amazon insisted that they did not verify a single report was due to their service as opposed to local problems for the user, it would still be conclusive evidence and no person with a brain would take them seriously.
How long after the shot is the risk elevated, forever?
Likely, we will not know for years what the adverse effects are / will be.. bad - especially for young moms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.