Donate to the Trump campaign.
Posted on 06/10/2023 9:51:18 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
Paul Sperry @paulsperry_
NEW: Special Counsel Smith's indictment alleges Trump showed off a military paper that he boasted was classified "highly confidential" and "secret," but the transcript reveals Trump actually said: "like, highly confidential" and "a secret." Smith omitted the words "like" and "a."
9:46 PM · Jun 9, 2023
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
https://twitter.com/jackposobiec/status/1667372630997860352
Jack Poso 🇺🇸
@JackPosobiec
And here we go again. The biggest bombshell portion of the Jack Smith indictment - the Bedminster tape - has already been debunked
Smith tampered with the evidence
Quote Tweet
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_
·
14h
NEW: Special Counsel Smith’s indictment alleges Trump showed off a military paper that he boasted was classified “highly confidential” and “secret,” but the transcript reveals Trump actually said: “like, highly confidential” and “a secret.” Smith omitted the words “like” and “a.”
No, it’s not evidence tampering. The actual transcript was included in the indictment, so nothing was altered. The prosecutor may have characterized Trumps wording in the body of the indictment, but the indictment is not evidence, it is an accusation. Unless the transcript itself was altered, Sperry is reaching and grasping for straws here, and so are you.
Is this real? Is Smith that dumb and desperate to think he could get away with something like this?
Entire thing is a banana republic set up.
Did Trump say the paper was not declassified?
Who’s side are you on?
Willfully and selectivly editing an innocent until proven guilty individual is grasping at straws? Ok got it. You support just a little bit of lying, not a lot, just a dash.
Whose
Certainly, the omission of the words “like” and “a” will be a strong foundation for Trump’s defense at trial.
Fake evidence! That’s unpossible
He likes to play both sides, he is bi-political.
But which version was presented to the Miami grand jury? Remember, this entire investigation took place in DC under a DC judge. Then a summary was “read” to the Miami grand jury to obtain an indictment.
EC
Thank you! My thoughts exactly!
Started 10 wars: Kept papers: pic.twitter.com/KVwD3sSYNB— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) June 9, 2023
He’ll get away with it, when it comes to Trump, anyone can tell whatever lies they want under oath and nothing happens to them. That’s why I find Turley’s statement about “these were people under oath” to be amazingly stupid.
He’ll get away with it, when it comes to Trump, anyone can tell whatever lies they want under oath and nothing happens to them. That’s why I find Turley’s statement about “these were people under oath” to be amazingly stupid.
That’s correct. This means the Miami GJ was presented altered evidence.
Judge should stick it to the so called special council and recommend him for suspension and throw the entire 37 counts out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.