If she looks like this I might be persuaded.
Posted on 06/06/2023 8:39:48 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
Eric Adams is considering Churches and Private Residences for housing illegals.
“It is my vision to take the next step to this faith-based locales and then move to a private residence... They have spare rooms."
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
In the video, notice who is surrounded by. Not very diverse.
We’re becoming South Africa.
Put a thousand of them in White House.
That’s right, Joe has room. Plus, he has several empty mansions.
Garbage scow...fitting.
In the video, notice who is surrounded by. Not very diverse.
“No soldier ...”
Let’s see how many new york city, pro illegal immigrant liberals will take up Adams on his offer to pay them to take these illegals into their homes.
That depends on how much they offer, doesn’t it?
Let’s be honest, the government steals our money anyways...
Why not get some back?
“But, of course, the second part of your comment is incorrect. The people surrounding the mayor are the very definition of ‘diverse’—at least as how the word is used now.”
I sit corrected! You are right, it’s 100% diverse.
I think leaky barges offers the best long term solution.
Cannot even IMAGINE the results & what all their neighbors will react to.
The “LOWER INCOME’ persons who “struggle” are already on Section 8.
I am confident that billionaires are not going to be handing over the keys to their pied-à-terres to illegals!
My guess is that (if it goes anywhere) this is going to lead to a Renaissance of the sort of 19th Century tenement housing that made the Lower East Side famous. (Think 10 people living in one 300 square foot unit with one bathroom down the hall.)
1907. TITLE 8, U.S.C. 1324(A) OFFENSES
Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens.
Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts.
Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry.
Subsection 1324(a)(3).
Alien Smuggling — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) makes it an offense for any person who — knowing that a person is an alien, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien.
Domestic Transporting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) makes it an offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law.
Harboring — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.
Encouraging/Inducing — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who — encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.
Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.
Bringing Aliens to the United States — Subsection 1324(a)(2) makes it an offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has not received prior authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever, such alien, regardless of any official action which may later be taken with respect to such alien.
The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), enacted on September 30, 1996, added a new 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(3)(A) which makes it an offense for any person, during any 12-month period, to knowingly hire at least 10 individuals with actual knowledge that these individuals are unauthorized aliens.
See this Manual at 1908 (unlawful employment of aliens).
Unit of Prosecution — With regard to offenses defined in subsections 1324(a)(1)(A)(i)-(v), (alien smuggling, domestic transporting, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or conspiracy/aiding or abetting) each alien with respect to whom a violation occurs constitutes a unit of prosecution. Prior to enactment of the IIRIRA, the unit of prosecution for violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2) was each transaction, regardless of the number of aliens involved. However, the unit of prosecution is now based on each alien in respect to whom a violation occurs.
Knowledge — Prosecutions for alien smuggling, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) require proof that defendant knew that the person brought to the United States was an alien. With regard to the other violations in 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a), proof of knowledge or reckless disregard of alienage is sufficient.
Penalties — The basic statutory maximum penalty for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(i) and (v)(I) (alien smuggling and conspiracy) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both. With regard to violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(ii)-(iv) and (v)(ii), domestic transportation, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or aiding/abetting, the basic statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 5 years, unless the offense was committed for commercial advantage or private financial gain, in which case the maximum term of imprisonment is 10 years.
In addition, significant enhanced penalties are provided for in violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1) involving serious bodily injury or placing life in jeopardy.
Moreover, if the violation results in the death of any person, the defendant may be punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of years.
The basic penalty for a violation of subsection 1324(a)(2) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(A). Enhanced penalties are provided for violations involving bringing in criminal aliens, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i), offenses done for commercial advantage or private financial gain, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), and violations where the alien is not presented to an immigration officer immediately upon arrival, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii).
A mandatory minimum three year term of imprisonment applies to first or second violations of § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i) or (B)(ii). Further enhanced punishment is provided for third or subsequent offenses.
It doesn't make business sense to rent these units at the rent-controlled price.
But at $125 per night per person it could possibly be profitable for the landlord/slumlord.
He could include the New Jersey residence that he was living in while running for Mayor (which should have put him out of the running, but he owned another NY residence and lied about it).
The mayor is not going far enough. Everyone living in public housing should be required to take in at least one “migrant”. It’s time for the people receiving public housing benefits to start “giving back”.
So a homeowner accepts the deal—$125 a day to house an illegal alien. Then he is arrested for harboring an illegal alien and the government seizes his house. Then they can have a bunch of illegals living there without paying the former homeowner.
If she looks like this I might be persuaded.
This is starting to get dangerously close to what Matt was predicting with Ferfal 3 to 4 years ago. All that needs to happen now is for it to become mandatory if you want any gov favor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.