Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden’s Push To Make Military Vehicles ‘Climate-Friendly’ Hands America’s Military Infrastructure To Red China
The Federalist ^ | 05/11/2023 | Shawn Fleetwood

Posted on 05/11/2023 7:25:21 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Transitioning the military into a ‘green’ fighting force would outsource America’s military hardware to its greatest adversary and damage its readiness.

President Joe Biden’s newest bid to make the American military “climate-friendly” wouldn’t just weaken our military advantage, it would put Red China in control.

During a recent Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Department of Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm was asked by Iowa Republican Sen. Joni Ernst whether she supports efforts by the Biden administration to make the U.S. military an “EV [electric vehicle] fleet by 2030,” to which Granholm replied, “I do, and I think we can get there, as well.”

“I do think that reducing our reliance on the volatility of globally traded fossil fuels where we know that global events like the war in Ukraine can jack up prices for people back home… does not contribute to energy security,” Granholm claimed. “I think energy security is achieved when we have homegrown, clean energy that is abundant.”

Granholm’s testimony was hardly the first time the Biden administration has outwardly endorsed the idea of overhauling America’s military to fit the left’s unrealistic vision of a so-called “environmentally friendly” fighting force. On Earth Day last year, Biden gave a speech in Seattle, in which he laid out his vision of using “billions” of taxpayer dollars to make “every vehicle” in the U.S. military “climate-friendly.” Unsurprisingly, the president failed to explain how he intends to achieve this ludicrous goal.

“I’m going to start the process where every vehicle in the United States military — every vehicle is going to be climate-friendly. Every vehicle,” Biden said. “No, I mean it. We’re spending billions of dollars to do it.”

[RELATED: U.S. Army Takes On Climate Change As ‘Serious Threat’ To National Security]

Last month, Biden signed an executive order titled “Revitalizing Our Nation’s Commitment to Environmental Justice for All,” which stipulates that pursuing so-called “environmental justice” is a “duty of all executive branch agencies and should be incorporated into their missions.” According to Fox News, the order was issued the same day the White House launched an “Environmental Justice Scorecard,” which the administration claims is “the first government-wide assessment of federal agencies’ efforts to advance environmental justice.”

“The administration’s efforts are already being carried out by the Department of Defense,” the Fox report reads. “The scorecard revealed the agency has ‘at least 640 staff that work on environmental justice, either in a full- or part-time capacity.'”

A ‘Green’ U.S. Military Puts China in Control

While leftists obsessed with climate alarmism are undoubtedly thrilled with the Biden administration’s energy-themed “transitioning” of the U.S. military, another likely proponent of the policy is Red China.

As The Federalist’s Tristan Justice previously reported, Beijing controls the vast majority (up to 70 or 80 percent) of key materials and components needed to make electric car batteries, including electric motor magnets. The supply of rare earth minerals, several of which are needed to construct these batteries, is also heavily dominated by China.

“China either directly controls the battery components or has secured long-term agreements with their respective producers to effectively control the markets for its necessary metals,” a recent Federalist report reads. “As a result of how China has positioned itself in any major transition to electric vehicles, it could not only be the world’s exclusive EV battery manufacturer, but it could very well be the sole manufacturer of the EVs themselves.”

In other words, if the U.S. military revolutionizes its automobiles to meet Biden’s impractical demands, it would put the military’s core infrastructure needed for combat and national defense in the hands of the Chinese Communist Party.

A National Security Disaster

Whether it’s incompetence or negligence, Biden’s bid to compel service members to rely on unreliable and lower-quality tactical vehicles during military operations would give the Chinese government greater influence over America’s armed forces. If the United States were to get involved in a major, armed conflict, a “climate-friendly” military in need of the batteries and components required to power these new automobiles would largely be dependent on markets dominated by Chinese state-owned enterprises.

Moreover, using EVs during military operations is wholly impractical. Unlike gas-powered vehicles, which can be filled up and used within several minutes, EVs often require extensive time to fully charge. According to Kelley Blue Book, for example, many of the new electric vehicles produced today “can take up to 12 hours to charge using a Level 2 outlet.” Gas-powered vehicles furthermore remain superior when it comes to mileage and repair costs.

Transitioning the military into a “green” fighting force would both outsource America’s military hardware to its greatest adversary and damage its readiness and capabilities. But as with other disastrous policies, Biden will continue ahead without a second thought.



TOPICS: China; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: automotive; ccp; chicoms; china; climatechange; military
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2023 7:25:21 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Making them EV will double their weight and cut their range to almost Zero


2 posted on 05/11/2023 7:27:39 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wait how would they charge them ? LOL


3 posted on 05/11/2023 7:28:03 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My advice to young people is to learn Chinese.


4 posted on 05/11/2023 7:28:20 AM PDT by JonPreston ( ✌ ☮️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The enlisted are not fooled.


5 posted on 05/11/2023 7:28:32 AM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Will no one rid us of the insanity?


6 posted on 05/11/2023 7:29:04 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

7 posted on 05/11/2023 7:29:05 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Fro this to woke recruitment videos….

Meanwhile
Video Russian army ad, be a man
https://rumble.com/v2m9zc8-russian-army-ad.html


8 posted on 05/11/2023 7:30:15 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The climate cult only see a very lane for their insane ideas logic and common sense are strangers to them just like the woke and drag fags.

Their oath is if it feels good do it


9 posted on 05/11/2023 7:31:32 AM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
EV's aren't "climate friendly" anyway. And making our military all-electric is treasonous.

I can see only a few use cases for electric vehicles in the military. Maybe have a few electric vehicles for quick (short range) stealth missions because they're quiet. Or a few electric transports as backup in case the enemy blocks gasoline logistics. Except for specific situations like that, electric vehicles in the military are a bad idea.

10 posted on 05/11/2023 7:32:07 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Much ado about nothing. Granholm was, as usual even when she was my Governess of Michigan, speaking out of her anal orifice.

The Army isn't switching to an all EV vehicle fleet. Maybe, MAYBE, domestic bases will use non-combat EV vehicles in some roles, but tanks, Hummers, APCs, Strykers, and other battle vehicles are not going electric. Some may go hybrid in the future, but not full EV.

11 posted on 05/11/2023 7:33:14 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Biden handed victory of any conflict to the enemy. Biden is destroying the USA.


12 posted on 05/11/2023 7:35:06 AM PDT by chopperk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Military vehicles exist to help our Soldiers fight, win and survive.

Anything that takes the focus off that endangers our Soldiers.

Endangering our Soldiers endangers our nation.


13 posted on 05/11/2023 7:35:30 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The push for battery vehicles is pure insanity, civilian and military.

There are huge energy density and refueling issues.

We don’t have the electrical generation capacity to support it, and cannot easily build it.

We don’t have the electrical transmission and distribution to support it, and cannot easily build/upgrade it.

We don’t have the materials mining and processing to support it, and can’t get there on the central planner-decreed timelines.

But other than the above, it is a GREAT idea!


14 posted on 05/11/2023 7:35:31 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Thismis an issue Trump should have brought up in the toen hall ambush. He could have said “what kind of president would want to reward China and awaken our military by adopting the asinine agenda to go electric with military vehicles?”


15 posted on 05/11/2023 7:36:03 AM PDT by Bob434 (question )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Pshaw - Xi is already in charge politically and is rapidly becoming one of the biggest land owners in the US. Military answers to Biden who answers to XI.


16 posted on 05/11/2023 7:41:53 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Transitioning the military into a ‘green’ fighting force would outsource America’s military hardware to its greatest adversary and damage its readiness.

Not to worry.

Part of the plan is to build charging stations all over the battle-fields, no matter where the battle fields are. And, the opposing forces would be asked to stop and take a break while our EV battle vehicles are recharging.


17 posted on 05/11/2023 7:45:08 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
And yet....

"China approved equivalent of two new coal plants a week in 2022" "China builds more new coal plants than rest of the world"

Source: https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/27/energy/china-new-coal-plants-climate-report-intl-hnk/index.html

And "China builds more new coal plants than rest of the world

Source: https://www.npr.org/2023/03/02/1160441919/china-is-building-six-times-more-new-coal-plants-than-other-countries-report-fin

When even the craven press notice, it becomes clear the Biden "green agenda" is NOT about climate, but about bending the knee to China, while the "climate change" folks look the other way.

18 posted on 05/11/2023 7:46:31 AM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It’s a hideous stupid idea from economic and strength perspective. That should be enough to rule out the idea before you get to the reliance on China argument.

The policy of the U.S. government should be to onshore and expand American business to reduce reliance on adversaries for strategically important products and resources. That changes every dynamic of foreign policy because the U.S. can act from a position of strength. Petroleum, rare earths, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, electronics, steel, aluminum and many other manufactured goods should be produced in America and exported to the world. This isn’t an isolationist policy. It is a policy of strength, where the world becomes dependent on the U.S., not the other way around.

19 posted on 05/11/2023 8:05:26 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA ("How did you go bankrupt?" Bill asked. "Two ways," Mike said. "Gradually and then suddenly." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperk

BIDEN is the ‘front man’.

OBAMA is pulling the strings


20 posted on 05/11/2023 8:29:24 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson