”The Supreme Court in Bruen and Heller held that citizens have a constitutional right to own and possess firearms and may use them for self-defense. PICA seems to be written in spite of the clear directives in Bruen and Heller, not in conformity with them. Whether well intentioned, brilliant, or arrogant, no state may enact a law that denies its citizens rights that the Constitution guarantees them. Even legislation that may enjoy the support of a majority of its citizens must fail if it violates the constitutional rights of fellow citizens. For the reasons fully set out below, the overly broad reach of PICA commands that the injunctive relief requested by Plaintiffs be granted."
Everything after p. 3 is a complete smackdown by the Judge, telling Fatboy Prickster and Smarmy Raoul exactly why they failed.
For the pure entertainment value, the entire ruling, all 29 pages were well worth the read!
(yes, I'm being lazy, long day today...if you don't mind)
Funny, my copy of the Constitution mentions nothing about “in common use.”
Great. Now how about New York?
“IT IS SO ORDERED - (to the fat piece of Commie ordure)” - Stephen P. McGlynn
Judge a Trump appointee! If illannoy pursues it to 7th circuit, 9 of the 14 judges are republican appointees!😀
Ps Same court that forced filthynois to pass concealed carry in 2013. The last state to do so and never ever would have without court order. FU democrats.
Governor Fat Ass deserves a smack down.
Outstanding ruling!
Not that I ever intended to comply anyway.
L
That’s quite the judicial smack down.
L
Today is a good day! Amen
This Ping List is for all news pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from this Ping List.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Washington is next.
Cam Edwards at Bearing Arms has a bit more information on the ruling here:
Bumping the good news.