Vermont school removes ‘male,’ ‘female’ terms from reproductive system lessons

https://nypost.com ^ | 04/27/2023 | Isabel Keane

[Elsie]

Gramma?

[Sirius Lee]

What’s the end goal with this lunacy?

[Elsie]

With all this LGBT and gender identity business , they are clearly ignoring the science.

Au contrare, mon ami.

They know EXACTLY what they are doing by the word salad smokescreen they are throwing up!

[Elsie]

And most to the point!

[Elsie]

BINGO!

[Elsie]

...yank those children out of schools...

This only works for YOUR kids.

The others remain to be groomed.

---

I'd suggest a different yank.

One found by falling thru a trapdoor in a scaffold.

[Elsie]

We got lunatics running public schools....

Not quite...

We have uncaring people, allowing lunatics to run public schools....

[Elsie]

Bone up on your world history.

and sperm producers in the same thread!

[Elsie]

Fire them and ban them from teaching anywhere.

Getting closer, but that still leaves them the possibility of a smaller audience for their evil ideas.

[norwaypinesavage]

I remember, even before starting Kindergarten, how to tell the difference between “boy puppies” and “girl puppies”. If Vermont adults think they can prevent school children from knowing there are differences between males and females in this world, they are the ones that are naive (and stupid).

[GreenHornet]

The changes reflect the district’s desire to use “gender inclusive language,” Principal Sara Jablonski wrote in the letter.

Using the terms "Male" and "Female" IS being gender inclusive - because they are the only genders that exist.

[bert]

-—uncaring——

I will argue that those you consider as uncaring have a higher aim. They want to be perceived as stylish.

I have begun to consider the issue in biological, Darwinian terms. Are there any transgender gorillas? or Elephants? or Sperm Whales?

Is there a biological advantage to having no gender present in the population? Does no gender make the human species more fit to survive?

When raising the question of survival of the fittest, it becomes obvious that those seeking to eradicate gender are the unfit and must be eradicated, exterminated, from the gene pool to insure survival of those who are fit

[Fzob]

What do you call a woman after menopause?

Less crazy? :)

[chopperk]

No surprises in this report about Vt. This State keeps electing a deviant porn writing pol into public office.

[crusty old prospector]

Ha ha.

[1Old Pro]

VT has gone woke. Helped by the U.S. government who turned Rutland VT info Somali land.

[Max in Utah]

What about a sterile male?

That would be a mule.

Crusty old prospectors of yore knew them well.

[NorthMountain]

Using the terms "Male" and "Female" IS being gender inclusive - because they are the only genders that exist.

Using the term "gender" in place of "sex" is the first step in conforming to the perverts' denial of reality.

Before I even started first grade, I knew there were two sexes: male and female.

In Latin class, I learned that there are three genders: masculine, feminine, and neuter. I also learned that the correlation between biological sex and linguistic gender could at times be a bit fuzzy.

Gender is not sex. The perverts WANT people to engage in confused thinking.

[hanamizu]

Likewise, they will no longer say “girl” or “female” but “person who produces eggs.”

---

Actually, if you follow the science, girls and women aren’t ‘producing’ eggs at all. All of their eggs were ‘produced’ before they were born and arbitrarily (according to these whack jobs) ‘assigned’ a sex.

[crusty old prospector]

You mean like this?