Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCarthy set to propose 1-year debt limit extension tied to spending reforms
Just the News ^ | 4/16/23 | Nicholas Ballasy

Posted on 04/16/2023 7:36:56 AM PDT by CFW

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy is set to propose next week a 1-year debt limit extension tied to spending concessions from President Biden and the Democrats.

According to a source familiar with the ongoing negotiations, concessions extracted in exchange for a debt limit increase would yield approximately $4 trillion in savings for taxpayers over a 10-year period.

The spending reforms sought by the House GOP include recovering unspent COVID stimulus funds, capping domestic spending at FY2022 levels and only allowing it to grow 1% over the next 10 years as well as enforcing a work requirement for recipients of Medicaid who are under 60 years of age and do not have children.

(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: debt; economy; spending
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
The problem is that the spending cuts are always promised for years down the road, but those cuts never happen. How many times have we been promised that these cuts would happen in the future, but the future never comes?
1 posted on 04/16/2023 7:36:56 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

Sell-out or surrender, but McCarthy is now working for Biden and the Democrats. He should have held a line on no new spending, no higher limit. He should have forced the government to reduce spending by getting rid of non-essential programs. Start with NPR and PBS, even though they are pennies in the overall budget.


2 posted on 04/16/2023 7:42:18 AM PDT by Reno89519 (Go Woke, Go Broke. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
How about this? Tie the spending reductions to the haircut that people who receive social security benefits will experience in 2033. In other words, absent changes that extend the life of Social Security and Medicare, total spending will be cut to 74 per cent of existing spending.

Start with pay cuts for the President, all Congressmen, and their staff in 2033.

Include all executives in the executive branch, including the military and independent agencies, in the haircut. This would be a pay cut based on performance, or the lack of performance.

If our Federal Government can't find enough fat in existing programs, and can't curb their appetite for spending other people's money, then make their lack of imagination painful for them.

3 posted on 04/16/2023 7:46:22 AM PDT by asinclair (What doesn't kill you makes you stronger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

No. Not one more nickel.

L


4 posted on 04/16/2023 7:47:30 AM PDT by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

McCarthy has a 5 seat margin in one of three branches of government. That isn’t a mandate by any means.


5 posted on 04/16/2023 7:48:00 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW

“...over a 10-year period.”

In other words, we are going to cave to Biden. How many times have we seen this? The real story is McCarthy is so incompetent he can’t even figure out another fake.


6 posted on 04/16/2023 7:49:46 AM PDT by Yogafist (Voting rino is voting for the managed decline of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

When are you going to release all of the J6 videos like you promised, Kev?


7 posted on 04/16/2023 7:51:36 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Reminds me of Charlie Brown and Lucy and the football.

A one year extension puts them right n the middle of the 2024 election and you know they will not let the government closed down in an election year.

Let’s face it, both parties are to blame for out of control spending.


8 posted on 04/16/2023 7:54:22 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asinclair

“...absent changes that extend the life of Social Security and Medicare, total spending will be cut to 74 per cent of existing spending.”

Nobody’s going to do nothing, until we get to the situation France is in right now, where they have to just raise the retirement age in order to avoid a steep benefit cut.

Though, the current inflation may actually help push the date back a little bit. After all, the SS inflation increases are tied to the CPI, but the CPI underestimates inflation. So every year that Bidenflation continues, we are essentially getting backdoor rate cuts without any legislative action at all.


9 posted on 04/16/2023 7:57:07 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CFW

As we have seen for decades, “ceilings” mean nothing in DC. New spending proposals should be accompanied by a plan on how the spending will be financed...either a new tax or funds transfers to the new program from some old program. That might force politicians to realize that they can’t have everything. Of course, it will never happen...


10 posted on 04/16/2023 7:57:07 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Maybe McCarthy thinks because Reagan cut a tax and spend deal with Democrats in the 1980’s it’s a good idea but the Democrats never kept their end of the bargain back then.

McCarthy trying to look good when he looks bad.

But as long as Trump gives his blessing to McCarthy we’re fornicated.


11 posted on 04/16/2023 7:58:32 AM PDT by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERBODY'S BUSINESS-REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asinclair
In other words, absent changes that extend the life of Social Security and Medicare, total spending will be cut to 74 per cent of existing spending

If you think that's actually going to happen, you are not a serious person.

12 posted on 04/16/2023 8:00:46 AM PDT by Jim Noble (You have sat too long for any good you have been doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Speaking of “ concessions “, how about a full audit of U.S. dollars being flushed down the toilet in Ukraine.


13 posted on 04/16/2023 8:00:59 AM PDT by BrexitBen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Yep.$33 trillion is soon to be $50 trillion.

Then the world stops using the dollar as the reserve currency (underway now), all that money overseas comes flooding back to the USA, and total economic disaster occurs. All your savings become worthless.


14 posted on 04/16/2023 8:01:27 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (I don’t like to think before I say something...I want to be just as surprised as everyone els)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Someone remind me again of what Frank Luntz’s roommate was saying about those 87,000 IRS agents back in January.


15 posted on 04/16/2023 8:03:19 AM PDT by OKSooner ("We're gonna put everybody over twelve out of business.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Nothing changes till the cash flow stops. It has happened to a major world power in our lifetime.


16 posted on 04/16/2023 8:03:36 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Trump endorsed him, so this must be Winning!


17 posted on 04/16/2023 8:04:11 AM PDT by momincombatboots (BQEphesians 6... who you are really at war with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

A warning when they say “spending reforms.” Total bullsh*t.


18 posted on 04/16/2023 8:04:29 AM PDT by wardamneagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist
Yep. "Over a 10-year period" is kinda like a person having some or another fitness goal they aspire to and they go to a trainer and get a "10-year fitness plan".

Who among us can recall the "10-year" hsit that was being legislated in 2013?

19 posted on 04/16/2023 8:07:11 AM PDT by OKSooner ("We're gonna put everybody over twelve out of business.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CFW

As predicted, spineless gomers of politics cave in to their liberal bosom buddies.


20 posted on 04/16/2023 8:11:41 AM PDT by chief lee runamok (Anti Socialist Derelict At Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson