Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/09/2023 12:17:41 PM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: McGruff

Emergency appeal....multi million dollar lawsuit!


2 posted on 03/09/2023 12:18:37 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (No Doubt Now: Stolen Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

We’re at the point where government is saying, “what are you going to do about it”


3 posted on 03/09/2023 12:19:00 PM PST by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

Sounds to me like laws were broken, and not buy the guy in jail.


4 posted on 03/09/2023 12:19:43 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

The committee on weaponization of government could fix all this in about 2 days if speaker McCarthy was willing to go along and start Signing ARREST and DETAINMENT WARRANTS for Multiple DOJ Officials and Judges.

“U.S. CODE
TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS
CHAPTER 6—CONGRESSIONAL AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE; INVESTIGATIONS
Sec. 193. Privilege of witnesses
No witness is privileged to refuse to testify to any fact, or to produce any paper, respecting which he shall be examined by either House of Congress, or by any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or by any committee of either House, upon the ground that his testimony to such fact or his production of such paper may tend to disgrace him or otherwise render him infamous.”

Simply look up Hinds Precedents, especially chapters 53 and 51, and Cannon’s Precedents, especially chapters 184-185. You’ll find numerous detailed cases of Congress asserting its power, arresting people, holding them until they agreed to answer questions, and then releasing them. Some of these people did not refuse to appear, but simply failed to satisfactorily answer questions.

Congress has the authority to arrest and imprison those found in Contempt. The power extends throughout the United States and is an inherent power (does not depend upon legislated act)

If found in Contempt the person can be arrested under a warrant of the Speaker of the House of Representatives or President of the Senate, by the respective Sergeant at Arms.

Statutory criminal contempt is an alternative to inherent contempt.

Under the inherent contempt power Congress may imprison a person for a specific period of time or an indefinite period of time, except a person imprisoned by the House of Representatives may not be imprisoned beyond adjournment of a session of Congress.

Imprisonment may be coercive or punitive.

Some references

[1] Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution, Volume 2, § 842 http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/print_documents/a1_5s21.html

[2] Anderson v. Dunn - 19 U.S. 204 - “And, as to the distance to which the process might reach, it is very clear that there exists no reason for confining its operation to the limits of the District of Columbia; after passing those limits, we know no bounds that can be prescribed to its range but those of the United States.” http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/204/case.html

[3] Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/125/case.html 73rd Cong., 78 Cong. Rec. 2410 (1934) https://archive.org/details/congressionalrec78aunit

[4] McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135 - Under a warrant issued by the President of the Senate the Deputy to the Senate Sergeant at Arms arrested at Cincinnati, Ohio, Mally S. Daugherty, who had been twice subpoenaed by the Senate and twice failed to appear. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/135/case.html

[5] Rules of the House of Representatives, Rule IV Duties of the Sergeant at Arms - [] execute the commands of the House, and all processes issued by authority thereof, directed to him by the Speaker. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/HMAN-105/pdf/HMAN-105-pg348.pdf

[6] An analysis of Congressional inquiry, subpoena, and enforcement http://www.constitutionproject.org/documents/when-congress-comes-calling-a-primer-on-the-principles-practices-and-pragmatics-of-legislative-inquiry/

In 1857, a New York Times reporter refused to say which members of Congress had asked him to get them bribes (protecting his “sources” just as various Judith Millers today protect the people who feed them proven lies that costs thousands of lives), so Congress locked him up until he answered and then banned him from Congress.

In 1924 an oil executive appeared but refused to answer certain questions, so the Senate held — literally held — him in contempt. Senator Thomas Walsh of Montana argued that this question of contempt was of the gravest importance, and that it involved “the very life of the effective existence of the House of Representatives of the United States and of the Senate of the United States.” The matter was taken to court, and the witness fined and imprisoned.


5 posted on 03/09/2023 12:20:28 PM PST by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

Oops.

Doesn’t sound like anyone is going to try to rectify this situation. We don’t have a legal system. We have a persecution system.


6 posted on 03/09/2023 12:20:50 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (“You want it one way, but it's the other way”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

Someone needs to go to jail for this. I’m sick of these ghouls trashing the law to get what they want. I also want to see some of these judges removed.


7 posted on 03/09/2023 12:21:43 PM PST by McGavin999 (A sense of humor is a sign of intelligence, leftists have no sense of humor, therefore………)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

The video of him walking the halls with capital police was seen a very long time ago. Wonder why his lawyer didnt bring it up sooner.....hmmmm!


10 posted on 03/09/2023 12:30:41 PM PST by mouse1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

Unfortunately no judge in D.C will grant an appeal no matter the evidence.


12 posted on 03/09/2023 12:33:29 PM PST by Husker24 (Pp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

Yes, it’s ridiculous. They didn’t try to deter him or stop him...in fact they facilitated him and then prosecuted him for accepting the facilitation by authorities.


14 posted on 03/09/2023 12:35:06 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

The prosecution almost certainly, and knowingly, withheld key discovery evidence. Isn’t this legally required PRIOR to the defendent making a plea agreement? If it is, he should be allowed to withdraw his plea. The prosecutor himself should be cited for misconduct and/or given the opportunity to request dismissal or downgrade of charges.


16 posted on 03/09/2023 12:38:13 PM PST by LuxAerterna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

The question not asked by Tucker was Now what? What are you or his current legal team going to do about these videos?


17 posted on 03/09/2023 12:42:33 PM PST by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff
To the Dems this does not matter.

They are not about rule of law.

19 posted on 03/09/2023 12:42:49 PM PST by Salman (It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff
Fake evidence was submitted to the FISA court in order to surveil on Trump and his associates. In a just world, all the charges brought against everyone affected should have been dropped and those who knowingly submitted such evidence should have been prosecuted.

But this is no longer a just world......

22 posted on 03/09/2023 12:53:59 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Owning a light sabre doesn't make you a Jedi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

It’s time for ‘Law & Order’ conservatives to take a hard look at plea deals.


26 posted on 03/09/2023 12:57:55 PM PST by Mr.Unique (My boss wants me to sign up for a 401K. No way I'm running that far! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

Why is he an “ex” lawyer of the Shaman?


36 posted on 03/09/2023 1:29:37 PM PST by vivenne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

Release every second of video to everyone. Do the same thing with ever voters registration file in the US.


38 posted on 03/09/2023 1:34:33 PM PST by isthisnickcool (1218 - NEVER FORGET!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

Hey, Queen Nazi Pelosi and her accomplices the Capitol Police were just teaching everyone not to invade their castle.


41 posted on 03/09/2023 1:38:16 PM PST by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

Every DOJ attorney who even got near this case needs to be disbarred.

Every last one.

L


48 posted on 03/09/2023 1:58:11 PM PST by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

Hiding exculpatory evidence is grounds for appeal to overturn the verdict. It is grounds for prosecutorial misconduct. It is grounds for civil lawsuits on EVERYONE.

Go make your money Mr. Lawyer, and represent your client.


49 posted on 03/09/2023 1:59:35 PM PST by Salvavida (“Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the former.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

Get him the “F” out of prison!


50 posted on 03/09/2023 2:10:34 PM PST by NeverTyranny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson