Battles in Vuhledar, Bakhmut Signal Imminent Russian Offensive, Analysts Say

Dozens of damaged military vehicles with Russian markings could be seen scattered chaotically across a snow-covered field in footage released last week of a battlefield near the eastern Ukrainian mining town of Vuhledar, southwest of the Russian-held city of Donetsk.

The hulls of some of the armored vehicles were covered in black soot from what appeared to be recent fires. Lying nearby were tank turrets and other parts from combat vehicles that had been dismembered by explosions.

Next to the burned-out vehicles, the drone footage clearly showed the dead bodies of what appeared to be Russian soldiers.

The intense fighting around Vuhledar is likely to have been one of the opening engagements of a major Russian offensive in Ukraine, analysts told The Moscow Times on Tuesday, as the Kremlin apparently gears up for a renewed attempt to seize large areas of Ukrainian territory.

The escalating military confrontation looks set to cause a major rise in casualties, heralding a new, bloody stage in the war as it enters its second year.

Russia’s losses — and failure to advance — in Vuhledar suggest they may not have much success.

"We are waiting for an expected offensive in the Kreminna-Svatove area that will likely be spearheaded by the 76th Air Assault Division,” Rob Lee, a fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, told The Moscow Times, referring to one of Russia’s elite paratrooper units.

“They may have more success [than in Vuhledar], but it is unlikely they will be able to achieve a true breakthrough and seize much territory."

If the fighting in Vuhledar is anything to go by, the Ukrainians will be able to put up a stiff defense against Russian attacks — and possibly inflict major losses.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces last week destroyed what appeared to be a Russian convoy near Vuhledar consisting of troops from the 55th Guards Naval Infantry Brigade and the 40th Naval Infantry Brigade, disabling more than 30 tanks and infantry fighting vehicles, according to Lee.

A surviving 55th Guards Naval Infantry Brigade marine who spoke with Russia’s 7x7 regional news site Monday said losses were so severe that only eight men remained in one of the unit’s companies (at full strength, each company has about 100 men).

“I wish I had been taken prisoner and never returned,” he said, according to 7x7.

Due to a lack of demining equipment, Russian commanders in Vuhledar reportedly ordered their tank units to attack Ukrainian positions in a single line, making them an easy target.

The Russian military’s tactics around Vuhledar have been bitterly criticized by several influential Russian military bloggers, including the Grey Zone Telegram channel, believed to be affiliated with mercenary group Wagner, and Igor Girkin, a retired Russian special ops officer who is a vocal critic of the Russian war effort.

Just 150 kilometers away from Vuhledar, Russian soldiers, including Wagner mercenaries, have also been stepping up their attacks on the city of Bakhmut — where fierce fighting has been ongoing for months.

"The Russians are advancing several times a day, one after the other. Ours shoot at them — they walk into the bullets and fall to the ground,” Ukrainian volunteer Viktoria Khamaza said last week of the fighting in Bakhmut to Ukrainian media outlet Zerkalo.

Kremlin-linked businessman Yevgeny Prigozhin, the head of Wagner, said over the weekend that his troops had seized the village of Krasna Hora to the north of Bakhmut, which, if true, would threaten Ukrainian supply lines into the contested city.

While Russia does not provide official casualty figures, there is some evidence that Russia has been suffering rising casualties in recent weeks — including Ukrainian claims of record Russian deaths as well as figures from independent Russian journalists tracking Russia’s human losses in the fighting.

The desire of Russia's political leadership to launch a significant attack is limited by the capabilities of the Russian Armed Forces and a lack of weapons and equipment, Israeli military expert David Gendelman told the Moscow Times.

"The Russian leadership faces a choice: either continue the slow gnawing in the Donbas… and increase the pressure along the entire Donbas front. Or to opt for a new major offensive from the north or from the south, which in the current circumstances would border on the adventurous," Gendelman said.

The expert added that the Kremlin’s decision would be reflected on the ground in the coming days.

Western politicians, military leaders and experts have been warning since late last year that the Kremlin is likely building up its forces to mount a new offensive.

What is happening now shows that a major Russian attack is already underway, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said Monday.

The likely goal of Russia’s military command is to regain the initiative it lost back in the summer, when Ukraine reclaimed swathes of territory in a successful counteroffensive, Bloomberg reported last month, citing sources. Experts at the U.S. Institute for the Study of War (ISW) expressed the same opinion in January.

Meanwhile, in contrast, the Kremlin continues to accuse Kyiv of amassing its own forces to launch an attack on Russian-held territory.

Some observers assess that President Vladimir Putin believes he can win thanks to the numerical superiority of his army, which has been replenished by hundreds of thousands of men called up in Russia’s “partial” mobilization last year.

Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia and Kharkiv regions have also been mentioned as possible targets for a large-scale offensive by Russian forces in addition to the Donetsk and Luhansk regions.

Major problems facing the Kremlin, however, are minimal training provided to newly mobilized recruits and losses of sophisticated military equipment.

Since the start of the invasion, Ukraine has destroyed or captured at least 1,727 Russian tanks, according to Dutch group Oryx, which uses open-source data to track Russia’s materiel losses.

Without sufficient tanks and armored fighting vehicles, Russia will struggle to carry out large-scale offensive maneuvers, according to ISW experts.

While Russia may be planning to try and launch a new offensive on the Ukrainian capital Kyiv, it is likely to fail given its poorly-trained troops, according to analyst Lee.

And if Russia loses significant amounts of men and materiel — like in Vuhledar — it will become vulnerable to a Ukrainian offensive later in the spring, he said, especially as Kyiv continues to receive advanced weaponry from its Western allies.

“The question is whether Russia has sufficient offensive capability to seize much territory,” said Lee.

“Russia has mobilized a large number of soldiers and likely has a manpower advantage, but these are not necessarily well-trained or motivated units. Poorly trained soldiers are more useful in defense than offense.”

I find it interesting that both Putin and Zelenskyy have been praised by Klaus Schwab as members of Young Global Leaders. But what can we peasants believe when our sources of information are completely controlled by varying side of a “global” confrontation. I fear it it is us (”little people” to quote Hillery) who are to be the victims, the sacrifice to “Mother Nature” for the “Great Reset.” Perhaps, both side here are blind to what’s going on. I don’t know. I wasn’t raised as religious, nor am I a believer: but it sure seems like we are headed to some sort of end-times prophecy.

Um no, “ i woukd rather see the money spent on a wall” is wishful thinking, thus not worth making an argument over it. That is a “political argument” not worth having. Afterall they want ice water in hell too.

I am not sure if you are referring to the Kerch Bridge on the east side of Crimea or the ways to enter Crimea from the north. I am not sure if HIMARS can reach the bridge. Last I heard the rail part was damaged such that only passenger trains could be used. Heavy military equipment was being carried on the large ferries remaining from the time before the bridge was finished a few years ago. I suspect Ukraine prefers not to destroy the bridge as there is still a large civilian population of Russians that moved there after 2014. Better to let them flee by car so they will not be there to feed and worry about once Ukraine moves to take Crimea. Then when peace is achieved with Ukraine regaining Crimea, the bridge can be used for Russian tourists to visit the Crimean beaches and help support Ukraine’s peacetime economy.

We are waiting for an expected offensive... What is happening now shows that a major Russian attack is already underway... The question is whether Russia has sufficient offensive capability to seize much territory

It is a sad commentary on the state of the Russian military that a week into the current operations, no one is really sure if it this is the promised winter offensive or not. As well as if Russia is actually capable of launching an operation larger than the initial invasion, including the Russians.

Politics is the art of the possible, the attainable — the art of the next best
Otto von Bismarck

Building a wall is not possible at this tine.

So yeah, i know politics, thank otto for explaining it to you.

Russia can and may well lose 50,000 and still fight on to win
—

In the first hour of the landing at Normandy, the US lost 4,000 KIA.

Russia is already way past your 50,000 number and working on 120,000 KIA (200s).

Many observers believe that the Russian version of the Battle of the Bulge offensive has already begun and already failed.

It has been shown that Russia lacks the wherewithal to accomplish the required victory on the ground

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.