Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After Ranked-Choice Voting Rigged Their Elections, Alaska Conservatives Fight To Reclaim Democracy
The Federalist ^ | 02/14/2023 | Shawn Fleetwood

Posted on 02/14/2023 9:51:35 AM PST by SeekAndFind

In the lead-up to the 2020 election, out-of-state dark money poured into Alaska to hijack the state’s elections by tricking voters into implementing a ranked-choice voting system. Now, following a midterm election fraught with record-low turnout and confused voters, Alaska’s conservatives are fighting to take back control of their state’s electoral process.

Known as Alaskans for Honest Elections, the grassroots organization is leading a statewide signature-collecting effort to put an initiative on the 2024 ballot to repeal Alaska’s ranked-choice voting (RCV) system, which voters narrowly adopted in 2020. Last month, Alaska Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom certified the group’s application for a petition to repeal RCV, meaning the organization may now begin collecting signatures from voters across the state. The group must get nearly 27,000 valid signatures in order for the initiative to appear on the ballot for the 2024 contest.

“We’ve put together over 5,000 volunteers who will be gathering [signatures] all over the state,” Art Mathias, who’s helping spearhead the signature drive, told The Federalist. “We’re going to be at several outdoor shows, boating shows.” We have volunteers who will “go to their friends, to their churches, to the shopping malls. Wherever people come through, [they’ll] collect signatures.”

Under RCV, which critics call “rigged-choice voting,” voters rank candidates in order of preference. If no candidate receives a majority of first-choice votes in the first round of voting, the last-place finisher is eliminated, and his votes are reallocated to the voter’s second-choice candidate. Such a process continues until one candidate receives a majority of votes.

With RCV also comes the potential issue of ballot exhaustion, which occurs when a ballot is cast “but does not count toward the end election result.” This can occur when voters fail to rank all the candidates on the ballot, leading to the disenfranchisement of voters (as some studies have shown).

While the 2020 RCV initiative, known as Ballot Measure 2, was sold to Alaskans as an effort to keep outside dark money from influencing the state’s elections, it was out-of-state funding that helped push the initiative over the finish line. According to an October 2020 report by Breitbart News, for instance, Yes on 2 for Better Elections, a pro-RCV group, raised more funds from outside Alaska ($6,194,081) than from within the state ($20,000).

RCV “becomes an invitation for exceeding amounts of dark money to come in and put forth a candidate that nobody knows,” Mathias said. “Alaskans are tired of being manipulated by rich people from outside [the state who] think they can tell us what to do.”

During the 2022 midterms, Democrat Mary Peltola defeated former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin in the race for Alaska’s at-large congressional district as a result of ranked-choice voting. The RCV system also made a difference in the state’s Senate race, where incumbent GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski fended off a challenge from Trump-backed Kelly Tshibaka. As The Federalist’s Tristan Justice reported, Murkowski’s allies were heavily involved in the push for Alaska to adopt RCV as a way to bolster the incumbent senator’s reelection prospects.

Both Palin and Tshibaka have since come out in support of repealing RCV in Alaska, with Tshibaka recently forming Preserve Democracy, a nonprofit group dedicated to “fighting the spread of Ranked Choice Voting and increasing voter turnout.”

Legislative Efforts to Repeal RCV

Beyond the efforts among grassroots activists, Republican lawmakers in the Alaska legislature are also attempting to undo many of the changes enacted by Ballot Measure 2.

Under SB 2, which state Sen. Mike Shower introduced in the upper chamber, Alaska would repeal RCV and return to a closed primary system where only voters “registered as affiliated with a political party may vote that party’s ballot.”

“A voter registered as nonpartisan or undeclared rather than as affiliated with a particular political party may vote the political party ballot of the voter’s choice unless prohibited from doing so under AS 15.25.015,” the bill reads. “A voter registered as affiliated with a political party may not vote the ballot of a different political party unless” state law permits them to do so.

While speaking with The Federalist, Shower described the feedback he’s received from his constituents over Alaska’s ranked-choice voting system, noting how “about 90 percent or more” of the people at his first town hall event for this year’s legislative session “were like, ‘Ditch this thing we hate.'”

“This rhetoric you’re hearing from Alaskans for Better Elections, from certain legislators in Alaska, and others [shows they] are living in the dream world that they have created for themselves; that they want to believe that [RCV is] this glowing example and that the public supports it,” Shower said. “I truly believe if [Alaska] held a vote tomorrow to repeal ranked-choice voting that it would pass.”

Shower went on to note how RCV often disenfranchises segments of voters that left-wing election groups often classify as marginalized, such as racial minorities and non-English speakers. Studies analyzing voting patterns in U.S. cities that utilize ranked-choice voting have shown this to be true.

According to a report from the Alaska Policy Forum, for example, after San Francisco, California, implemented an RCV system, voter turnout decreased among black and white voters, as well as those who were younger or didn’t have a high school education. Similar trends were also present in Minneapolis and Oakland, where “voters in predominately minority precincts were less likely to fully utilize their ballots, making ballot exhaustion more likely.”

A companion bill to SB 2 (known as HB 1) has also been introduced in the state’s House of Representatives by GOP Reps. George Rauscher, Kevin McCabe, and Sarah Vance.

Challenges Ahead

Despite being a reliably Republican jurisdiction, Alaska’s current political dynamics — particularly in the state Senate — make advancing any meaningful election-integrity legislation somewhat difficult.

While Republicans outnumber Democrats in the upper chamber (11-9), eight GOP senators have abandoned their more conservative colleagues to form a majority coalition with the body’s nine Democrats. According to Alaska Public Media, the Senate’s leadership is composed of GOP Majority Leader Cathy Giessel and Senate President Gary Stevens, as well as Democrat Sen. Bill Wielechowski, who is chairman of the Rules Committee and coordinates with Stevens about “which bills are voted upon.”

During an interview with The Federalist, Shower, who didn’t join the ruling coalition, noted how opposition to RCV doesn’t fall along party lines and that “not all of the Democrats support ranked-choice voting.”

“There’s some [Democrats] that are kind of in the middle, and then there’s actually a few Republicans that are in on it,” he said. “A couple of the [GOP senators] that are going to tell you it’s great and they love it got [elected] because of ranked-choice voting. If there had been a normal primary, they would not have won, and they know that. So they’re going to support ranked-choice voting because to them it’s a political advantage.

“It’s not about philosophical positions or the positions of a party platform. This is about personal power,” he added.

While SB 2’s prospects for passage in the upper chamber remain in question, Stevens has publicly indicated support for keeping RCV in place for the time being, telling the Anchorage Daily News last month he “think[s] it worked fine” and that the state “should give it a chance to see if it works in the future.”

Legislators should be “very cautious and skeptical of efforts to install ranked-choice voting into [their] state because it actually does suppress the votes of very vulnerable groups,” Shower said. “All is not well here [in Alaska], and they should be advised of that.”


Shawn Fleetwood is a Staff Writer for The Federalist and a graduate of the University of Mary Washington. He also serves as a state content writer for Convention of States Action and his work has been featured in numerous outlets, including RealClearPolitics, RealClearHealth, and Conservative Review.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; consevatives; rankedchoice; rcv

1 posted on 02/14/2023 9:51:35 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Somebody is smokin’ Mantanuska Thunderfreak if they think once democrats get power like this that anything short of nuclear war will ever wrest it back. Alaska is blue now, forever


2 posted on 02/14/2023 9:56:27 AM PST by dsrtsage ( Complexity is just simple lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“This can occur when voters fail to rank all the candidates on the ballot”

This is exactly the same as not voting whenever you don’t like either candidate in a regular Dem v Rep general election.


3 posted on 02/14/2023 10:04:15 AM PST by JSM_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSM_Liberty

No excuses. Fix it. Sarah was pitted against another republican. She should have walked into the House.


4 posted on 02/14/2023 10:07:15 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“During the 2022 midterms, Democrat Mary Peltola defeated former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin in the race for Alaska’s at-large congressional district as a result of ranked-choice voting. “

Peltola beat Palin because a number of Begich’s voter preferred Peltola over Palin.


5 posted on 02/14/2023 10:07:25 AM PST by JSM_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSM_Liberty

RE: Peltola beat Palin because a number of Begich’s voter preferred Peltola over Palin.

What would these voters have does had there been no RCV?


6 posted on 02/14/2023 10:09:29 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sarah’s time has passed. She should have taken on Murkowski before all these changes took place. Hindsight is 20-20. She took too much time on the sidelines. Ask Jeb.


7 posted on 02/14/2023 10:12:06 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“What would these voters have does had there been no RCV?”

They would have voted for Peltola in the general election.


8 posted on 02/14/2023 10:13:15 AM PST by JSM_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Same old story. The voters are deep red, but the legislature is dominated by RINOs. RCV ensures MAGA candidates lose. It’s okay with RINOs if a Democrat wins over MAGA.


9 posted on 02/14/2023 10:25:13 AM PST by HandBasketHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSM_Liberty

I was under the impression that did NOT happen. That your number one vote counted. Period.


10 posted on 02/14/2023 10:40:07 AM PST by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

if your number 1 choice is eliminated, then your vote won’t count in the next round if you didn’t select a 2nd choice.


11 posted on 02/14/2023 11:03:56 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Ranked choice voting is unconstitutional on equal protection grounds based on the Bush v. Gore ruling.

Only the people who voted for the least-like candidate gets their second choice vote counted, essentially a revote that nobody else gets if it were a run-off election instead.

If a candidate drops out of a 4-way race, everyone should get the chance to choose again in a new 3-way race, not just the supporters of the loser. Also, voters who sat out the 4-way race should also have the opportunity to join in a 3-way race despite not voting in the 4-way race.

Furthermore, a person's second choice might depend on who loses the first round. Ranked choice voting makes the voter lock in their preferences despite not knowing what the elimination path will look like, taking away their right to change their minds based on the changed field of candidates.

For these reasons, ranked choice voting is clearly unconstitutional and should be blocked by the courts if the legislation can't stop it on their own. Besides, it shouldn't be stopped on a state-by-state level, it should be stopped nationally for being an unconstitutional binding of a person's future vote that would not exist if true run-off elections were held.

-PJ

12 posted on 02/14/2023 11:13:39 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, the problem is, once you let your elections get hijacked, it’s almost impossible to get them un-hijacked again. Usually you won’t do it without bloodshed.


13 posted on 02/14/2023 12:07:35 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HandBasketHell

RCV ensures MAGA candidates lose.
********
Not if the MAGA voters are in the majority. If they are, they’ll win under either voting system.

Cheating can influence either voting system; but It’s actually harder to cheat under ranked choice than under successive run-off elections, where the cheaters get multiple chances to cheat, as they did in Georgia.


14 posted on 02/14/2023 12:31:22 PM PST by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JSM_Liberty
<>With RCV also comes the potential issue of ballot exhaustion, which occurs when a ballot is cast “but does not count toward the end election result.” This can occur when voters fail to rank all the candidates on the ballot, leading to the disenfranchisement of voters (as some studies have shown).<>

Which is why rigged choice voting is unconstitutional. I cannot be forced by law to vote for someone I despise.

15 posted on 02/14/2023 2:57:10 PM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

“Which is why rigged choice voting is unconstitutional. I cannot be forced by law to vote for someone I despise. “

You don’t have to vote a candidate that you despise. If there are 5 candidates and you despise 2 of them you can simply vote 1,2,3 for the 3 that you can stand.

Personally I would love to give a last preference to a candidate that I despise.


16 posted on 02/14/2023 3:17:29 PM PST by JSM_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JSM_Liberty

I’ll refine my comment.

I cannot constitutionally be forced by law to vote for anyone I do not wish to vote for.


17 posted on 02/14/2023 4:02:10 PM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

and you don’t have to, my previous comment stands. You don’t need to rank any more candidates than you wish.


18 posted on 02/14/2023 4:14:00 PM PST by JSM_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie; JSM_Liberty
I cannot constitutionally be forced by law to vote for anyone I do not wish to vote for.

You're not being forced. Suppose there are three candidates: a good conservative, a RINO, and a Democrat. You give your #1 ranking to the conservative. No one forces you to choose between the RINO and the Democrat. You rank the conservative first and call it a day.

Without RCV, it's substantially the same. You vote for the conservative in the Republican primary. Sometimes, though, the RINO will beat the conservative. Then you'll face a general election choice between two candidates you despise. Here again, no one is forcing you to vote for either. Just leave that line blank or don't show up at all.

Under either system, YOU get to decide whether, as between two candidates you despise, one is less despicable, enough so that you hold your nose and express a preference for that one over the other one.
19 posted on 02/14/2023 8:25:09 PM PST by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson