WATCH: Biden Nominee for Federal Judge Can’t Answer Basic Questions About U.S. Constitution

RNN ^ | 01-26-2023 | Becca London

[montag813]

by Becca London

At the U.S. Senate on Wednesday, several Biden nominees for Federal judicial positions appeared before Judiciary Committee members for questions.

But one group of questions in particular is causing shock and even anger among the public as the video starts to go viral.

The questions were posed by Lousiana Senator John Kennedy (R) to state Judge Charnelle Bjelkengren, who was nominated by Biden for the lifetime position of U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington.

The "answers" were non-existent.

Kennedy began by asking Judge Bjelkengren, about Article V of the US Constitution.

Bjelkengren responded, "Article V is not coming to mind at the moment."

Article V outlines the process in which the Constitution can be amended.

Kennedy then asked, "Okay, how about Article II?"

WATCH:

[OHPatriot]

Fat & Stupid fits too

[ifinnegan]

Black skin?

[SaxxonWoods]

When you hate the Constitution its words don’t stick with you.

[torqemada]

Doesn’t matter what color she is - she’s bone stupid and should be dismissed out of hand as a nominee.

[Boogieman]

“Charnelle Bjelkengren”

Gesundheit!

[robowombat]

Love to ask this woke blockhead (a) Where was the Constitutional Convention held ? (b) In what year was the convention held? (c) Who was selected as chairman of the convention? (d) When was the Constitution ratified? (e) How many amendments are there? (f) What state did not participate in the convention Extra credit How many US Presidents former and future attended the convention?

[TBP]

You know, the thing.

[TBP]

That’s exactly why Biden nominated her. If she doesn’t understand the Constitution, she’ll be the perfect liberal judge.

[Magnum44]

Kennedy:

Try to remember,

and dont mind your gender...

That pesky notion,

called the constitution...

Reply:

I dont recall...My mind...its

[G Larry]

So, Article II and V are not addressed in the Bar exam?

[Hambone 1934]

Should have been non-white skin....

[Wuli]

Unfortunately for many great women in this country, the nominee who could not answer many legal questions put to her was nominated by Biden merely because she IS a woman; for Biden that was the only “vetting” that concerned him.

[Laslo Fripp]

…smarter than Patty Murray.

Isn’t that a rather low bar?

[rktman]

Most of the assclowns in CONgress probably can’t either.

[Tench_Coxe]

“Senator Lindsey Graham, the new top Republican on the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, on Wednesday called for a shift in how GOP senators approach President Joe Biden’s judicial nominees as he urged them to work with Democrats to confirm more judges.”

[justme4now]

My observation on most "Judges", indeed, most people is,they have zero understanding of the constitution ... Including the SCOTUS!

That is why we have so many Unconstitutional laws on the books, including all gun laws!

Even Judge Jeanine Pirro shows her ignorance from time to time.
(Especially when discussing guns and gun laws!)
Even the so called elite, former SCOTUS assistants are weak on the subject.
(ex:Laura Ingraham!)

The main problem can be explained by the two images below!😟




BTW, Not even SCOTUS has the authority to ignore bad laws that contradict the Constitution even though we've aloud them to over the years!
As the two images above explain.

[lakecumberlandvet]

Biden’s nominees don’t know the Constitution and, furthermore, don’t believe they should know or follow the Constitution. Following the Constitution would interfere with their tendency to render biased, unconstitutional decisions.

[justme4now]

ALLOWED!!!😡

[smokingfrog]

[Cobra64]

BFF. They can’t even define what a woman is.