Posted on 01/20/2023 10:27:41 PM PST by blueplum
Tensions between Elon Musk and Senate Democrats are heating up ahead of former President Trump’s expected return to Twitter, which comes amid reports that the popular social media platform has seen a rise in hate speech since Musk’s takeover last year.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is raising concerns about Twitter’s opaque financing and whether foreign interests could gain enough influence over the “digital town square” ahead of the 2024 election to pose a national security threat.
Musk, anticipating more criticism from Democratic lawmakers, on Wednesday predicted the Biden administration “may try to weaponize federal agencies against Twitter.” ...
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Are the Twitter-Libs still bellyaching about Trump on Twitter?
Get over it! We deal with your Press Agent Katrina who knows nothing and mispronounces almost everything.
If Liz is worried about furrinners, she can toss a bill in the hopper to help get the US out from under the Refugee Convention.
Don’t worry Liz, I don’t hate you, I only despise you.
I suggest she should use a mirror when looking for a national security threat.
So the Ukrainians can interfere in the 2016 elections and fund the DNC in the 2020 and 2022 elections, now they’re just worried that something might get in the way of their plans to swing 2024 to worthless Dems...
Which reports? Whose reports? Some leftist filthbag "news" outfit? Some leftists/RINO/globalist scum NGO or .org?
Definition of hate speech: Speech which questions any part of the vile leftist/globalist/"rainbow" agendas or which criticizes any individual or group who are part of them or who promote them.
Devin Nunes said that Trump has no plans to go back to any social media.
Why would he?
Truth Social is growing.
"There are only two genders"...?
"We should deport people here illegally"...?
"There sure is a lot of violent black on white crime"...?
"Only actual women should be allowed to compete in women's sports..."?
"Did you hear about the Zulocks?"
"The Democrats used mail-in votes to commit voter fraud in 2020"...?
"Hey, I'm beginning to think that Covid vaccine is causing heart attacks in young people"...?
That sort of "hate speech?"
She was happy enough with Twitter when it was channeling the Democratic party line under the tutelage of the FBI . . .You know, the patriots who had the Hunter Biden laptop for about a year before the 2020 election - but insinuated powerfully that it was “Russian disinformation” when anyone sentient could have known to the contrary after that much time to check it out. But the agency was determined not to know that.
No threat to “our democracy” there . . .
She was happy enough with Twitter when it was channeling the Democratic party line under the tutelage of the FBI . . .You know, the patriots who had the Hunter Biden laptop for about a year before the 2020 election - but insinuated powerfully that it was “Russian disinformation” when anyone sentient could have known to the contrary after that much time to check it out. But the agency was determined not to know that.
No threat to “our democracy” there . . .
Free speech silencing, loser commies are hate. Not a surprise.
Yes, you've go it. That kind. The lefties really hate it.
Yes, you've go it. That kind. The lefties really hate it.
“hate speech” = “anything disliked by liberals”
Why do they never complain about Joy Behar’s hate speech?
>>She was happy enough with Twitter when it was channeling the Democratic party line under the tutelage of the FBI . . .<<
Exactly. Remember all the cries of “Twitter is a pdivate company and not subject to govt oversight!” when cinservatives pointed out that our voices were constantly and consistently silenced?
All of a sudden, it is a national resource requiring govt control? I don’t think so.
Hate speech
Def. Any words spoken that offend democrats. IE If you say that 2+2=4, and it offends a Democrat, it’s hate speech.
Special circumstances. It does not matter if what is said is accurate, only that a Democrat can argue that it is somehow racist or sexist, and it is hate speech. Any scientific field theorems are graded against democrats opinions of them, and if they are true, but offend democrats, they become hate categories. Therefore, math is hate, even if 2+2=4 it must also be seen to equal 5 for democrats, otherwise it’s hate science. Conversely, science doesn’t have to be accurate or reproducible, or make accurate predictions, as long as it conforms to democrats view of sex and race….See Climate Science.
Example: Saying that female black skydiver will fall to earth at the same speed as a white male skydiver is hate speech in a hate science (physics) based upon another hate science (math).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.