Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

and twitter before Musk????
1 posted on 01/20/2023 10:27:41 PM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blueplum

Are the Twitter-Libs still bellyaching about Trump on Twitter?
Get over it! We deal with your Press Agent Katrina who knows nothing and mispronounces almost everything.


2 posted on 01/20/2023 10:33:59 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum
Suck it up, cupcakes. The Sheriff is back in town.

3 posted on 01/20/2023 10:34:26 PM PST by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

If Liz is worried about furrinners, she can toss a bill in the hopper to help get the US out from under the Refugee Convention.


4 posted on 01/20/2023 10:37:01 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

Don’t worry Liz, I don’t hate you, I only despise you.


5 posted on 01/20/2023 10:38:53 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

I suggest she should use a mirror when looking for a national security threat.


6 posted on 01/20/2023 10:41:24 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

So the Ukrainians can interfere in the 2016 elections and fund the DNC in the 2020 and 2022 elections, now they’re just worried that something might get in the way of their plans to swing 2024 to worthless Dems...


7 posted on 01/20/2023 10:56:48 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum
comes amid reports that the popular social media platform has seen a rise in hate speech since Musk’s takeover last year.

Which reports? Whose reports? Some leftist filthbag "news" outfit? Some leftists/RINO/globalist scum NGO or .org?

Definition of hate speech: Speech which questions any part of the vile leftist/globalist/"rainbow" agendas or which criticizes any individual or group who are part of them or who promote them.

8 posted on 01/21/2023 1:17:34 AM PST by Rocco DiPippo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum
Rise in "hate speech?" I wonder what kind of hate speech.

"There are only two genders"...?
"We should deport people here illegally"...?
"There sure is a lot of violent black on white crime"...?
"Only actual women should be allowed to compete in women's sports..."?
"Did you hear about the Zulocks?"
"The Democrats used mail-in votes to commit voter fraud in 2020"...?
"Hey, I'm beginning to think that Covid vaccine is causing heart attacks in young people"...?

That sort of "hate speech?"

10 posted on 01/21/2023 3:10:49 AM PST by A_perfect_lady (The greatest wealth is to live content with little. -Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum
Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is raising concerns about . . . whether foreign interests could gain enough influence over the “digital town square” ahead of the 2024 election to pose a national security threat.
She was happy enough with Twitter when it was channeling the Democratic party line under the tutelage of the FBI . . .

You know, the patriots who had the Hunter Biden laptop for about a year before the 2020 election - but insinuated powerfully that it was “Russian disinformation” when anyone sentient could have known to the contrary after that much time to check it out. But the agency was determined not to know that.

No threat to “our democracy” there . . .


11 posted on 01/21/2023 3:42:37 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (A jury represents society. It presumes the innocence of anyone the government undertakes to punish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum
Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is raising concerns about . . . whether foreign interests could gain enough influence over the “digital town square” ahead of the 2024 election to pose a national security threat.
She was happy enough with Twitter when it was channeling the Democratic party line under the tutelage of the FBI . . .

You know, the patriots who had the Hunter Biden laptop for about a year before the 2020 election - but insinuated powerfully that it was “Russian disinformation” when anyone sentient could have known to the contrary after that much time to check it out. But the agency was determined not to know that.

No threat to “our democracy” there . . .


12 posted on 01/21/2023 3:42:37 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (A jury represents society. It presumes the innocence of anyone the government undertakes to punish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

Free speech silencing, loser commies are hate. Not a surprise.


13 posted on 01/21/2023 4:14:07 AM PST by Vision (Woke is communism and it has no place in America. Election Reform Now! Obama is an evildoer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum
I wonder, who could it be? It's a mystery!


14 posted on 01/21/2023 4:16:44 AM PST by Lazamataz (The firearms I own today, are the firearms I will die with. How I die will be up to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

“hate speech” = “anything disliked by liberals”


17 posted on 01/21/2023 4:31:23 AM PST by freedumb2003 (Difference between a cow and the US Capitol 1/6 "riot:" you can only milk a cow 3 times a day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

Why do they never complain about Joy Behar’s hate speech?


18 posted on 01/21/2023 4:32:31 AM PST by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

Hate speech

Def. Any words spoken that offend democrats. IE If you say that 2+2=4, and it offends a Democrat, it’s hate speech.

Special circumstances. It does not matter if what is said is accurate, only that a Democrat can argue that it is somehow racist or sexist, and it is hate speech. Any scientific field theorems are graded against democrats opinions of them, and if they are true, but offend democrats, they become hate categories. Therefore, math is hate, even if 2+2=4 it must also be seen to equal 5 for democrats, otherwise it’s hate science. Conversely, science doesn’t have to be accurate or reproducible, or make accurate predictions, as long as it conforms to democrats view of sex and race….See Climate Science.

Example: Saying that female black skydiver will fall to earth at the same speed as a white male skydiver is hate speech in a hate science (physics) based upon another hate science (math).


20 posted on 01/21/2023 5:26:55 AM PST by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

Trump and Elon Musk about to give out the senate democrats dirty deeds list don’t be surprised at what you see.


23 posted on 01/21/2023 8:46:18 AM PST by Vaduz (LAWYERS )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

Musk washes away more brain cells every day, than WARREN has ever had.

Look up DITZY in the dictionary-—and there she is.


24 posted on 01/21/2023 8:51:22 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson