[rellimpank]

--maybe (in a few years)

[rellimpank]

—and—

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/2a-groups-brace-to-fight-atf-register-or-surrender-demand-on-40m-guns/ar-AA16luqH?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=b68354e87d89441482251aeb3bf6bb7a

[muir_redwoods]

I think a gun ban of any sort is problematic, SCOTUS has applied a test that gun laws must be consistent with limits in place at the time of the inclusion of the second amendment into the constitution.

I am unaware of any bans on types of firearms at that time.

[Let's Roll]

I saw an article yesterday that said several Illinois sheriffs were not going to enforce the ban.

[traderrob6]

“In that ruling, justices said lower-court judges no longer can decide on the constitutionality of gun laws on the basis of modern concerns about public safety.”

As if it were EVER valid to do so. If that was or is such a major concern then pass an amendment to the constitution.

[faithhopecharity]

1. 99 percent will ignore it
2. it is just another patently unconstitutional effort to disarm American citizens like their were living in Germany of 1938
3. it is as stupid as a day-old moose turd, anyway

[moovova]

When does SCOTUS get fed up with Illinois’s crap and just slap on a restraining order banning them from ever instituting a new gun law unless it’s been cleared thru SCOTUS first!

[familyop]

Justice Kavanaugh wrote a good dissent as a federal judge against a previous assault weapons ban.