Posted on 01/14/2023 7:19:09 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
All stocks, so would be NFA. Clearly all intended to be shouldered. All would have been NFA last week, last month, last year, last decade as well, because they are stocks.
The pistol stock, as such was not really banned by the NFA. Short barreled rifles were "banned" (through outrageous taxes for the time by the NFA) But wether pistols, with a stock added, were short barreled rifles was not clear for quite a while...
The original point was to stop people from making concealable weapons from long guns, not making hard to conceal long guns from pistols.
” But wether pistols, with a stock added, were short barreled rifles was not clear for quite a while...”
It was always clear that an actual stock was an NFA item.
The lack of clarity came in 2014 when the ATF appeared to give a thumbs up to a brace that had enough stock like characteristics that people were able to hold it to their shoulder like a stock.
Basically: stocks were always SBRs, braces on pistols were OK, but the grey area was created over the last ~8 years when braces were invented that were stock-like. ATF first said OK, then reversed themselves when they got very popular.
Regardless, I’ll stick to my main point - NFA is the problem, the brace issue is just a symptom.
Always is a long time. It did not become "clear" until well after WWII.
Regardless, I’ll stick to my main point - NFA is the problem, the brace issue is just a symptom. You main point is absolutely correct.
“It did not become “clear” until well after WWII.”
You are right, but we are talking about over half a century now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.