Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wayne07
The problem is the NFA. SBRs should not be regulated and subject to a tax stamp. All this is, is arguing about the minutiae of whether a brace is secretly a stock (and yes, 99.9% of braces are are really stocks), and those were banned in the NFA.

The pistol stock, as such was not really banned by the NFA. Short barreled rifles were "banned" (through outrageous taxes for the time by the NFA) But wether pistols, with a stock added, were short barreled rifles was not clear for quite a while...

The original point was to stop people from making concealable weapons from long guns, not making hard to conceal long guns from pistols.

63 posted on 01/16/2023 4:54:14 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

” But wether pistols, with a stock added, were short barreled rifles was not clear for quite a while...”

It was always clear that an actual stock was an NFA item.

The lack of clarity came in 2014 when the ATF appeared to give a thumbs up to a brace that had enough stock like characteristics that people were able to hold it to their shoulder like a stock.

Basically: stocks were always SBRs, braces on pistols were OK, but the grey area was created over the last ~8 years when braces were invented that were stock-like. ATF first said OK, then reversed themselves when they got very popular.

Regardless, I’ll stick to my main point - NFA is the problem, the brace issue is just a symptom.


64 posted on 01/16/2023 7:27:57 PM PST by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson