What the name of the case? I can’t find it anywhere.
Read all of that and still have no real idea what the decision was about.
G
Someone translate this legal garbage into English.
VERY poorly written article. I kept reading to find out what the 8-1 ruling applied to. I am still at a loss. Can’t find more info.
And to think Cameltoe is the Border Czar, what a pair!
Hard to parse this one but it actually sounds like it was the 9th Circuit that got its wrist slapped, not the Biden administration. Biden and Trump admins both wanted Title 42 to stay in place although for different reasons I’m guessing. Title 42 used Covid as a reason to restrict certain types of immigration. My guess is Biden’s people liked the idea of being able to control people’s movement due to a “health crisis.”
The government said Hansen persuaded at least 471 people to join his program, charging them each up to $10,000 even though he “knew that the adult adoptions that he touted would not lead to U.S. citizenship.”
Hansen was convicted in 2017 of violating provisions of the federal law that bars inducing or encouraging noncitizens “to come to, enter, or reside” in the United States illegally, as well as mail fraud and wire fraud and was sentenced to 20 years in prison.
On appeal, the 9th Circuit in February ruled that the encouragement law is unconstitutional because it is overly broad and criminalizes even commonplace speech that is protected by the First Amendment, such as telling undocumented immigrants, “I encourage you to reside in the United States,” or advising them about available social services.
Biden’s administration called on the nation’s highest court to take on the case, arguing that the appeals court was wrong to invalidate an “important tool for combating activities that exacerbate unlawful immigration.”
Sounds to me that the Biden Administration got exactly the riling that they wanted. So, why would it be a blow to Biden?
He’ll just ignore it.
Was this case decided in June 2022 of last term? https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-rejects-bail-hearings-detained-immigrants-2022-06-13/
This looks like several different cases rolled into one poorly worded article. Must be penned by someone who graduated with a bullsh¡t English class like Ebonics or something.
Please explain what this is one sentence.
Does “Remain in Mexico” stay intact? Title 42?