Posted on 12/09/2022 7:50:44 AM PST by bitt
Attorneys representing the Missouri and Louisiana AGs in their case against the government have uncovered that the State Department was funding fact checkers possibly in the US.
TGP reported over the weekend that the FBI and DOJ were working with Big Tech to target conservatives. This was recently confirmed, although we have suspected this of taking place for years.
The Gateway Pundit readers know that The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft is a co-Plaintiff, along with several doctors and a Louisiana news outlet, in Missouri and Louisiana lawsuit against the Biden Administration. The AGs of Missouri and Louisiana are suing the Biden Administration (Missouri, et al, v. Biden, et al), the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, the DOJ, Jen Psaki, Anthony Fauci, Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, and other federal agents and agencies for colluding with Big Tech to censor Americans all across the nation.
That lawsuit, the most important First Amendment lawsuit in America in the past 60 years, has turned into a barn burner – but the good guys are actually winning this time.
In October, a Federal Judge ruled that even before the court decides the government’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit, Anthony Fauci and a number of other clowns, including former State Department Daniel Kimmage must sit for depositions and spill their guts.
The Biden Administration’s lap-dogs lawyers, the Department of Justice freaked out and have desperately sought to shut down many of the depositions for absurd reasons. But this hasn’t worked to date.
The Attorneys General recently deposed Daniel Kimmage, the Acting Coordinator for the Global Engagement Center at the Department of State.
The Gateway Pundit tonight can confirm that we’ve uncovered something shocking and potentially corrupt or even criminal that was revealed during his deposition.
Krimmage held the following role from February 22, 2021, through June 30, 2021:
…the Acting Coordinator for the Global Engagement Center at the Department of State. In this role, Mr. Kimmage leads [led] efforts to coordinate and synchronize U.S. government communications efforts designed to counter terrorist recruitment and state-sponsored propaganda and disinformation. Based on Kimmage’s testimony we’ve uncovered information that the State Department was funding online fact-checkers. Kimmage doesn’t state whether it was foreign or domestic fact-checkers that the State Department was funding.
In the deposition in the Missouri and Louisiana case against the government, Kimmage shared the following:
...MORE
P
QUICK!!!!! Get Mary garland on the hot line! Those depositions need redacted STAT!
Well Semimojo, what is your spin on this?
I told you so.
So once again, the taxpayers themselves pay for the gutting of their own liberties and freedoms.
Go figure.
the State Department was funding fact checkers possibly in the US.
***************
The State Department has been compromised by socialist and communists since the 1930’s.
Tailgunner Joe (Joseph R. McCarthy) revealed this, the MSM destroyed him, and he was vindicated when the KGB archives were opened after the fall of the Soviet Union. There was never a retraction or apology by the New York Times and the other controlled MSM outlets.
So this is not a surprise to
Like every other corrupt action committed by the government, no one will be held to account with any punishment for their treasonous acts. However, we will have to listen to the RINO establishment rants as they pretend they are upset.
The State Department works with fact checkers to "...counter terrorist recruitment and state-sponsored propaganda and disinformation".
And this guy doesn't think they do it in the US.
Beyond the typical GP hyperventilation what am I missing?
The group doing a lot of the fact-checking on Facebook was based in France. I was constantly getting the “check the election results” fact checks on virtually all of my posts.
Stark contrast with the hard data from the Twitter files that they targeted specific conservative individuals and topics for shadow banning. They also lied about it. Executives of a publicly traded company. Would seem to me that would open them to legal or civil repercussions. We’ll see how far that goes. Haven’t seen anything shocking or unexpected yet.
Unfortunately, the left took it as an instruction manual.
More like, these attorneys need to be arrested for treason, immediately (stat). 🙂
They'll say what they were doing wasn't shadow banning.
Musk said Twitter will continue to limit "the reach" of certain types of speech but he probably wouldn't call it shadow banning either.
Yawn, yawn, yawn…doesn’t matter what the RATS do…RATS are in charge of law and how it is applied or not…
(Gomer Pyle) SUR-PRISE, SUR-PRISE, SUR-PRISE!
I wonder if enough people who vote will care. At least 50% seem to be interested only in what they can get by suckling the government teat.
Heads are going to roll on this one. We got the little SOB’s
So you admit they do it. Good.
GOVERNMENT is controlling "private" censorship. Just want to make sure you understand the central point here.
Read later.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.