[traderrob6]

I have been a Trump supporter since first nominated and ever since and would not hesitate to vote for him again.

That being said I have read his quote a dozen times rolling it around in my head each time and it sure appears to me that he WAS advocating going extraconstitutional to rectify election fraud.

If so it’s troublesome and disconcerting.

[Antoninus]

That being said I have read his quote a dozen times rolling it around in my head each time and it sure appears to me that he WAS advocating going extraconstitutional to rectify election fraud. If so it’s troublesome and disconcerting.

It's kind of cute when people pretend that the Democrat party (and indeed, the whole UniParty) has been acting constitutionally for the past 20 years.

Here's the hard truth: We've been living under a post-Constitutional government at least since Obama. Maybe before depending on where you set the benchmark.

[jpsb]

What do you suggest as a remedy for a rigged election?

[qaz123]

Is what was posted above, the earlier statement?

If not, can you post the original?

[zeebee]

Thump said, A massive fraud like this allows for the termination…
I read that as meaning if you allow this, you would allow for a the termination of the constitution.

[caww]

It shouldn't be troublesome nor disconcerting. Politicians I have supported over the years are not perfect either and what they say should not be as scrutinized as we see happening in the media 24/7 - who want to use their position of power to influence or tear down anyone they target.

To expect perfection one must first look in the mirror.

[sauropod]

Go read it again. He did not say what u thought he said.

[fishtank]

I give you an "F".

[CitizenUSA]

There isn’t a constitutional means of correcting a fraudulent election, and Trump is correct that nothing has been done to fix it so it won’t happen again.

With Democrats and do nothing Republicans, there is no solution to this particular one of election manipulation. That would be my question to Trump. What do you propose to solve this, Mr. Trump, because those of us who believe the election was not fair or free have no political power to fix it.

[ohioman]

Give us a break. Your going to get carpel tunnel syndrome from clutching your pearls so hard.

[Mr Rogers]

It wasn’t 16th dimensional chess. It was a straightforward statement. Unfortunately, it SUCKED. It said what it said.

If Trump didn’t want it interpreted the way people are, he shouldn’t have SAID what he said.

[JackFromTexas]

“That being said I have read his quote a dozen times rolling it around in my head each time and it sure appears to me that he WAS advocating going extraconstitutional to rectify election fraud.

If so it’s troublesome and disconcerting.”

Very troubling.
The Constitution has no specific about this, though. Laws and procedures already passed by Congress, State and Local authorities are being denied, prevented by those in power.
The Press is all for this denial and hiding. Few if any seem able and willing, and they are blocked from the only legal, reasonable recourse or even investigation.

The problem is, how is the doubt, mistrust and very probable
fact of election shenanigans dealt with? If the Courts will not, if those who have doubts are shoved aside as ‘crazies,’ if the ‘normal’ legal responses are denied, what is there left but the example of Athens? And on the scale that would call for, there is only Civil War.
I am frightened.
Both sides must take a good, clear look at what is, or might be the problem. For either party to deny any good look is to appear as one hiding something EVIL. The guilty flee . . . or hide . . .