Posted on 12/05/2022 5:24:08 PM PST by Nextrush
....again.
After 5 or 6 years of this, he should know better. He shouldn't put himself in this position. The fact that he did speaks to very serious problems with his judgement.
Sure you can!
If their memory span is so short to forget what they just read... “A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude ..."
Perhaps he figured that poeple knew at least a LITTLE bit of their country's history...
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends,it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form,as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes;and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable,than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a designto reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government,and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies;and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations,all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
The 'how to do it' wasn't given here, either.
All,
Please post a link to the entire, unedited Trump statement at issue. I can only find excerpts and editorialized versions.
L
Absolutely true.
However, the men alive during the Founders time had a few luxuries that we do not.
They had the luxury of their foe not having a few tanks and armored personnel carriers just down the street.....and they had the luxury of not existing in a system that allows for constant surveillance of their actions and communications, with groups of shadowy government agents that utilize that system.
So they had a few luxuries that we do not.
I agree...However, the "it" was crystal clear in the Declaration...I want to hear candidate Trump's concept of the basic action to be taken. The phrase he employed in one of his Dec. 3 posts was "unprecedented cure". I want to know what he has in mind.
He could have made it more clear. Our constitution does not provide restitution for fraudulent elections.
And now everyone’s talking about what to do when elections have been stolen. That was Trump’s original intent, and its worked like a charm.
Trump already won in a landslide in 2020. The independents and women who have already decided they don’t like him weren’t enough to stop him. The only thing that stopped him was election fraud. That’s why “running on the past election as the main argument in the next election” is not only not foolish, it’s vital for him to do so. Without addressing the issue of election integrity, all other issues are irrelevant.
Of course he does...this statement is an attempt to light a fire under those who can act (state legislatures) to get off their duffs and figure out what can be done. In the past, situations like this have often resulted in Constitutional amendments.
In this particular instance, I’m not sure where he’s headed with his “unprecedented cure” phrase.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are absolutely correct... he didn’t spell that out and for good reason. However, it seems that this might exactly be the point... I’m sure he had numerous objectives when he wrote what he did and we can speculate about that until the cows come home. Regardless, one objective seems to be that he wants to make it resoundingly obvious to all (to the level of acknowledgement) that the DemRats, enemedia and the FIB have pushed the country into a position of uncharted and dangerous waters for where there is no ‘prescriptive cure’ (if I can use that term). He didn’t create this situation, but he has warned about it over and over as he has battled the DemRats, enemedia and FIB over what they did (speaking specifically but not exclusively about the 2020 election)...... Now that it’s patently obvious to all (except those with their fingers in their ears shouting “I can’t hear you!) PDJT is essentially asking the questions (and I would argue he is asking this in a rhetorical sense to the whole country to get them thinking hard about this matter), “What do you want to do about it, what remedy is acceptable?”
If there is no remedy to what they did, then life carries on with it now an ingrained part of our lives that what the DemRats, enemdia and FIB did is acceptable (by definition if nothing is done about it).... unless people have the hope that the DemRats, enemedia and FIB have a ‘come to Jesus moment’ and will make massive changes to their philosophy and MO on their own that will assume that in the future, they agree to conducting their affairs in an honest way and will do their part to ensure a level playing field. Are you counting on that? If not, this then brings back the question of “what is the remedy.... and that can be further segmented into what is the remedy to fraud that was done in the past as well as how are things going to be done in the future?”
This brings the thought process to another aspect of what has gone on in recent weeks and that is that PDJT has started to use the word ‘communist’ more and more as he describes the DemRats and their unholy alliance with the enemdia and the FIB. Is he wrong to do that? In what way is the current situation different than a communist country? He didn’t ask this question in his message, but he may as well have.... “If there is no remedy that is enacted, does that mean that you are happy about living under one party rule that was created through fraudulent means? Do you find it acceptable to live under a communist regime?”
That's how these leftist liars work.
The Bible PROVES that Jesus wants you to commit suicide!
Matthew 27:5 ESV
And throwing down the pieces of silver into the temple, he departed, and he went and hanged himself.
Luke 10:37 KJV
Then Jesus said, "Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.”
How about PUNISHMENT for those who cause them?
I'm sure there are PLENTY of state laws that do!!
Actually, Elsie, that was a declaration of war against the ruling regime, as the document made abundantly clear:
“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”
The ‘how to do it’ wasn’t given here, either.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That is an excellent point that all the posters who are saying “Trump worded this so poorly/stupidly and didn’t define what ‘unprecedented cure’ is” need to deeply reflect on... and good grief, there are tons of them.
Always remember:
The Swampocrats ARE what they falsely accuse us of being.
See this thread though it’s chock full of those severely lacking reading comprehension.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4113720/posts?q=1&;page=501
I never even opened one thread about this the last couple of days. The titles were so outrageous I knew the MSM was at it again, i.e., lying. Then Pence jumped on board... Mika and Joe have nothing on that little weasel.
How many people think Sarah Palin claimed she could see Russia from her front porch?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.