it’s moot...
Am I correct in assuming, they got away with it?
SCOTUS os as corrupt as the DOJ, FBI, ATF, SEC, CONGRESS, WHut, DHS to name a few.
Voters lack standing in elections because shut up.
Voters do not have standing. Candidates defeated through fraud do not have standing. Who does?
Elections are illegitimate
Courts won’t help
What’s left?
Therefore, the SC ahos need to stop Dominion from making millions off of lawsuits of people who supposedly hurt their friggin’ feelings. Nobody knows if Dominion helped the commie RATS steal the electoon or not. Therefore, lawsuits are a waste of time.
It appears the Supreme Court has a painting of judge Roy Bean in their quarters.
Are the laws and court precedents defining standing themselves constitutional?
Our judicial system is nearly wholly corrupt, referring to the stance that voters and watchdogs have no standing.
That is to be expected as fascists take power and they have planned and strategized for more that four decades. Idiots think the money they were paid will save their status.
A rude awakening awaits the useful idiots.
This isn’t going end well for the world, unless unbridled evil floats your boat.
No one has standing, but perhaps those invoking their 2nd amendment rights. That’s where this is heading. Hopefully it doesn’t come to that.
Voters who had an electoon stolen from them have no “standing”. Its time to defund these Feral courts and fire all of the Feral “judges”. They are too anti-American. If a group of freeloading illegal aliens brought a lawsuit against Dominion, they’d be rolling in the dough right now. They have “standing”. Americans don’t.
This was noted days ago when this case was first posted. It had zero chance, and not just because of standing.
So if those who cast legal ballots don’t have standing in a case where their ballots may have been invalidated and they have been disenfranchised, who does?
We’ve long passed the point that not only can one side commit all kinds of election law violations, they can do so with absolute impunity. They only have to keep up the charades until the elections are certified, then all the challenges become moot, along with the “standing” of any of the challengers . . .
“courts routinely dismiss such cases as ‘generalized grievances’ that cannot support standing”
IOW there is never a case where there is standing
Either every single voter in the country files or nothing.
So it’s always nothing.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly stated that it will not here cases with “generalized grievances.” Therefore, no Article III standing. Plain and simple.
What Federal Constitutional issue is present here for SCOTUS to decide?
THIS is the main reason Vote Fraud will remain a clear and present danger to free elections. When given the job of clarifying what vote counting system is working and what is not, the Supreme Court, highest court in the land, can’t even be bothered to examine the topic. I don’t know if that decision was unanimous or what?
Why, it’s almost as though the SCOTUS did not wish to change the status quo, or to ‘rock the boat’.
**Do certain Justices gain a personal advantage by allowing the helter-skelter nature of Dem Vote Bundling to continue?
Which Supreme Court Justices might that be?
Inquiring minds want to know.
make sure to bring enough rope for 7 of the SCOTUS members