The government's big lie about ivermectin finally revealed Joel S. Hirschhorn shares jaw-dropping quote from federal attorney defending FDA in lawsuit

wnd.com ^ | 11/30/2022 1300 hrs est | Joel Hirschorn

[rktman]

By now millions of Americans well-informed about the pandemic know that the cheap, safe and effective generic medicine ivermectin (IVM) was blocked for wide-scale use from the very beginning by the federal government. It was a critical but medically wrong tactic within the wait-for-the-vaccine strategy. Preventing early use of IVM has surely killed and harmed hundreds of thousands of Americans. A few courageous doctors have successfully been using IVM during the pandemic, but most feared punishment as they lost their medical freedom.

Now comes a mind-boggling statement from an attorney defending the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in a lawsuit brought by three doctors. The following statement should be copied and used by both doctors and individuals to freely prescribe and use IVM in the earliest stage of COVID infection as an antiviral. It always should have been seen as an alternative to experimental, unsafe and ineffective COVID vaccines.

Here are the amazing words of the federal attorney:

"The cited statements were not directives. They were not mandatory. They were recommendations. They said what parties should do. They said, for example, why you should not take ivermectin to treat COVID-19," Isaac Belfer, a lawyer defending FDA, told the court. "They did not say you may not do it, you must not do it. They did not say it's prohibited or it's unlawful. They also did not say that doctors may not prescribe ivermectin."

Imagine that! So, let truth prevail. Let national access to IVM begin!

[rktman]

CDC=CONvid Disinformation Central. Butt, as we all know, recommendations by the branDUHn (b)administration carry the weight of law. Right? 🔬🦠🤔😵‍💫🚫😷💉🤡🐂💩

[mewzilla]

CoupFlu policy has NEVER been about protecting public health anywhere on the planet.

[rktman]

This is me learning that we’ve been once again lied to by these assclowns...😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴

[marktwain]

"They said, for example, why you should not take ivermectin to treat COVID-19," Isaac Belfer, a lawyer defending FDA, told the court. "

They portrayed a matter of opinion as established fact, for political purposes.

It was scientific fraud.

[FreedomPoster]

Good Ivermectin links collection.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4092336/posts?page=93#93

[ArcadeQuarters]

Do conspiracy theorists ever get tired of being right? It must be exhausting in recent years.

[bray]

No, they said it was a poison.

[FreedomPoster]

Allowing Ivermectin use would have gotten into the pockets of all those profiting from Big Pharma’s fraud.

[caddie]

This guy is a liar.

Physicians trying to prescribe ivermectin were threatened not only with temporary sanctions but with loss of board certification and even licensure.

[ridesthemiles]

FIRST-—KILL ALL THE LAWYERS

[logi_cal869]

Translated:

We covered our asses from top to bottom.

So, then: Who directed this FDA wording and the conflicting CDC treatment protocols which murdered THOUSANDS????

That’s the million $$ question, but we all know it’ll take a Special Counsel & Select Committee to dredge up the communications...and that it will NEVER happen.

[Turbo Pig]

I’d really like to hear from the pro big Pharma, government mandate WU-FLU shot contingent on this one.

[Tench_Coxe]

"The cited statements were not directives. They were not mandatory. They were recommendations. They said what parties should do. They said, for example, why you should not take ivermectin to treat COVID-19," Isaac Belfer, a lawyer defending FDA, told the court. "They did not say you may not do it, you must not do it. They did not say it's prohibited or it's unlawful. They also did not say that doctors may not prescribe ivermectin."

Maybe true on its face, but doctors who did had their license to practice threatened. And people who ordered it due Walgreens, CVS (and others) refusing to honor perscriptions ran the risk of having their packages seized by the USPS.

Imagine getting ahold of the back channel talk that enabled that.

[logi_cal869]

Just curious:

Are you aware of ANY FReeper with loss of smell having tried an Ivermectin regimen?

[rktman]

Yeah, to quote former president DJT: “Drinking bleach will stop CONvid 19!”. /S. 👺👺👺👺👺👺

[canuck_conservative]

They had to negate invermectin as an effective treatment against COVID, because that’s the only way the vaccine-makers could get emergency approval

FDA rules say you can’t get that emergency approval if ANY other effective treatment already exists

so it was always all about the $$$$$ ... start investigating the vaccine-makers!!

[for-q-clinton]

Next big question is WHY did the gov’t lie to us about Ivermectin? Hint: Follow the money.

[No Party Affiliation]

The govt had to nix the use of Ivermectin. If it were available and in use then no EUA would have been legally possible for the “vaccines” per FDA guidelines.

Sadly, there will be no accountability.

[bray]

Yeah, he supposedly said to inject bleach which was a complete lie.

[Qiviut]

People DIED because of the “it’s horse dewormer” stance of the CDC/FDA & medical community/hospitals refusing to treat patients with IVM & pharmacists, practicing medicine without a license, refusing to fill legal prescriptions. Docs who did use it are still being PERSECUTED.

Get a rope for those who demonized IVM & withheld it, deliberately, because if there was an “effective treatment” for C-19, which IVM & hydroxychloroquine are (hydroxy also demonized & ‘unavailable’), there would have been NO EUA & Big Pharma et al would have lost out on their billions made on the poison death shot.