Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The US Supreme Court Case that Could Change Everything
Golden Age of Gaia ^ | 11/26/2022 | Suzanne Maresca

Posted on 11/28/2022 12:34:49 PM PST by nikos1121

From the website ralandbrunson.com, updated as of November 23, 2022

Background ~

Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged. What got their attention was when the proposition to investigate those claims was presented to Congress and put to a vote.

What came as a shock to the four brothers is when they discovered that 387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation. Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation.

The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris.

He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.

The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris.

He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.

Their brother Gaynor was heavily occupied with his audio/video television business (Rock Canyon Studios) so Deron got together with his other two brothers to plan out the strategy. They decided to have their oldest brother Loy to be the name on the lawsuit, which is called a “Complaint” and because he would be on the Complaint, the Court would refer to him as the Plaintiff. The 388 people being sued will now be called Defendants.

Loy filed the complaint, which eventually got stuck in the Federal Court, so they got together and decided to have their brother Raland file the identical lawsuit with his name on it, in the Utah 2nd District Court. While Loy’s lawsuit continued to be held hostage in the Federal Court, Raland’s lawsuit eventually made it to the SCOTUS.

The events of both lawsuits [from March 23, 2021 to November 23, 2022] can be seen at https://ralandbrunson.com/


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: election; hh2; lawsuit; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 last
To: StAnDeliver

Ok


121 posted on 11/29/2022 6:27:18 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

It’s already passed that first hurdle. I’m just as pessimistic as the next person, but sometimes God works in strange ways.

I can’t believe that He will allow this country go to the devil. Our elections have always been secure.

This Cert is asking the court to recognize that our elected leaders have failed in their sworn duty to protect and defend us from foreign invaders.

I think this is an issue that would have been taken seriously when are parents were growing up in this country. Now?

Anyway, we will just have to wait and see, right?


122 posted on 11/30/2022 8:20:48 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
"Several legal scholars were on TV this past weekend amazed that the SCOTUS is contemplating it"

Ask your television, since it seems to talk to you and tell you things no one else can see.

123 posted on 11/30/2022 8:36:50 AM PST by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: LeoTDB69

If they win Pence can’t run


124 posted on 11/30/2022 11:11:24 AM PST by BigEdLB (Let’s go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: semimojo
New threed up that has the link directly to the USSC docket. I tried to find this last night. Either I goofed search terms or it hadn't posted yet. Whatever on that!

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4112940/posts?page=8

Conference scheduled for January 6. Outcomes for this I think are: 1) Most likely, reject the petition. This is what statistics would indicate. 2) Least likely, agree to the petition via summary judgment. 3) medium likely, order briefs. 4). Low to medium likely, order oral arguments.

Clerks and inferior courts are out of the game, at least until the conference decision is in, probably middle to late January.

I perhaps should have added an additional least likely that the petition could be remanded to a fed district court for fact finding. To me, facts are simple and laid out already. The root decision is based on a US Magistrate ruling, which is not fact finding but more along the line of probable cause. Seems to me that ship has already sailed. For sure though, four or more Justices have already passed on that option for now.

Keep in touch if you want. I’ll not likely post in this threed further. The OP post from the above link has better detail for wrapping opinions around, agree or disagree.

125 posted on 11/30/2022 1:44:04 PM PST by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl99
"Conference scheduled for January 6. Outcomes for this I think are: 1) Most likely, reject the petition. This is what statistics would indicate. 2) Least likely, agree to the petition via summary judgment. 3) medium likely, order briefs. 4). Low to medium likely, order oral arguments."

An 4-piece bucket of KFC Crispy, cooked "low to medium likely", is closer to anything regarding a factual resemblance to the outcome of Brunson than the absolute nonsense you just postulated.

"2) Least likely, agree to the petition via summary judgment."

I gotta tell you, this one was a hoot. Cert-tastically insane!

But look, just to finishing punching down on you...some SCOTUS clerk is going to soon put Brunson in the round file for dismissal, and that dismissal list will issue Dec. 12 or Jan. 23. And as I said on the other thread -- which is 2 more threads than this crap ever deserved -- I will be back to collect...

126 posted on 11/30/2022 2:12:57 PM PST by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson