Thanks for posting this article BTW.
Posted on 11/28/2022 12:34:49 PM PST by nikos1121
This is a civil suit, pro-se (by the harmed). We benefit, obviously, if redress is granted to Rayland. As I mentioned, a process will ensue. The long path, which IMHO will not be taken, but used as a threat to cause other things to happen earlier, involves the civil redress to lead to criminal proceedings. However, the courts are already proven to be compromised... thus things could “short circuit” towards much earlier and effective remedies.
You are giving up too early.
See the interviews...
Exactly. And the other side of this coin - if SCOTUS does not do what is right, they know they will get hammered when things are eventually righted, as they will be accomplices to treason.
How about Orly Taitz? Or Lucas "Inspector" Smith?
For a case like this, you need to bring on the Big Guns!
SCOTUS *HAS* agreed to conference the question of Certiorari. This will NOT be a pocket denial. SCOTUS *HAS* been in touch with the Brunson's, even requesting that they expedite the filing. In the Brunson's favor is that this is PRO-SE, and that it is under SCOTUS Rule 11, and under Federal Emergency status.
I don't believe that. See the discussions and rationals.
Look, this was vetted by a Citizen’s Grand Jury. The Supremes have to take it or deal with the Sheriff of Denny’s.
Thanks for posting this article BTW.
Actually, Rule 11 makes it even more of a long shot than normal, since Rule 11 requires a heightened standard of the Supreme Court taking it. SO far, it has been docketed. Like all cases, it goes on a list to be decided at Conference. Most on that list do not even get discussed as the Conference focuses on cases in which a Justice had indicated an interest to discuss. AT this point, this case isn’t any further along than any other case that has been filed. The pro se parties driving this appear clueless and overly excited about routine Supreme Court procedures.
Rule 11. Certiorari to a United States Court of Appeals
Before Judgment
A petition for a writ of certiorari to review a case pending
in a United States court of appeals, before judgment is entered in that court, will be granted only upon a showing that
the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify
deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court. See 28 U. S. C.
§ 2101(e).
President Trump has the honor of being the last legitimate President of the United States.
1776-2000 R.I.P.
Now we're less than a banana republic.
That is not an argument at all.
Once a member of the House, the Senate, or the President has been duly administered the Oath of Office, they are in that position and can only be removed in the manner that the Constitution says they can be removed. None of those manners include nullifying an election after the fact by a court because fraud was uncovered.
Even if tomorrow a group of people confessed to rigging the 2020 election for Biden, showed exactly how they did it, and had Biden on tape ordering it all to be done, the ONLY WAY TO REMOVE BIDEN from office is Impeachment by the House, and conviction by the Senate. The Supreme Court can't remove him, a Federal court can't remove him, and a state court can't remove him. Only a majority of the House can vote to Impeach him, and two-thirds of the Senate can vote to convict him. Upon conviction, the penalty as stipulated in the Constitution is removal from office, whereby the 25th Amendment is invoked to replace the President with the Vice President. NOT the wronged party from the election.
You might not like it, but it is the Constitution as written, and the Constitution is all that matters.
Unfortunately, it appears that the majority of those charged with upholding our sacred Constitution, throughout our government, have failed to do so, and seem perfectly willing to sell their own children and grandchildren into slavery.
Sad.
The case was dismissed out of hand in federal court because congressmen acting in their official capacity have sovereign immunity, plus, these knuckleheads have no standing.
The 9 SCOTUS justices are more likely to show up uninvited at my house for dinner tonight than they are to grant cert.
“how is the Court going to enforce the decision ?”
**************
How many legions does the Court have?
None.
“Yes I’m cynical beyond reason”
***********
You’re rightfully cynical for countless reasons.
Anyone who isn’t cynical by now needs a serious reality check.
There is so much news breaking every day it becomes challenging to keep up, especially on new topics one is not following with search function
I guess I’m guilty of being lazy & just looking at interesting posts on the Q thread or front page of breaking news, so prolly a lot has gone under the bridge before I show up?
Thanx for splaining this
Those Citizen’s Grand Juries mean business! They're nothing to mess with.
I remember when a Citizen's Grand Jury brought down the entire Obama Administration!
Or almost did, at least. That Cold Case Posse was this close!
If only I had sent Mike Zullo more money...
In a nutshell, that's exactly what is going on.
I have a foggy recollection of that. One obot even voted not to indict Obama. I don’t think it counted though, because that particular Citizen’s Grand Jury didn’t even require potential members to prove their identity with a long form birth certificate.
They took this thread off the sidebar!!!! lol 😂
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.