Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Trump: “We Have To Defeat The Climate Hoaxsters!”
WeLoveTrump.com ^ | 11/23/2022

Posted on 11/24/2022 2:04:33 PM PST by SoConPubbie

President Trump is taking “woke” head on.

And peak woke is the climate hoax, which is really just another way to extort money from the American people.

This is one of his best clips, watch here:

President Trump: "we have to defeat the climate hoaxsters!" pic.twitter.com/6ElugFGpY5

— DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) November 23, 2022

He’s 100% right!

Always fighting for America.

The scam has been exposed:

No human experiences 'climate change' in a lifetime, only seeing 'seasonal' weather. Climate change takes hundreds, thousands or tens of thousands of years. These forces are not short-term – for example, it takes a thousand years to lay down 1cm of sedimentary rock. It's a hoax. pic.twitter.com/PTnt7hcOmO

— Peter Clack (@PeterDClack) November 18, 2022

And:

A hoax about carbon dioxide & the climate has caused a global energy & economic disaster. This is because the United Nations lied about CO2 & climate to peddle its own importance. CO2 sustains all life on earth but it's in long-term decline. Now we face the return of an ice-age. pic.twitter.com/iDlqa6eySO

— Peter Clack (@PeterDClack) November 20, 2022

I love this:

Thank you Jim for your honesty here:

Biden agrees to use U.S. taxpayer money for climate reparations to Third World countries. Of course, the climate change agenda is a hoax. But giving away your money is quite real.https://t.co/U3PMOICp68

— Jim Rickards (@JamesGRickards) November 19, 2022

Now let’s go deeper…

Have you heard of this?

Blood and Gore: The Untold Story Behind Al Gore’s Carbon Tax Company

You’d think I were making this up, but sadly I’m not.

Remember the whole Carbon Tax thing that Obama and the Dems were pushing?

Literally a tax on the air.

Funny, who is described in the Bible as the Prince of the Air?

Anyway, I digress.

Remember that?

Well, here’s the part I bet you didn’t know.

Al Gore was deep into it and had even formed a company with his friend David Blood to capitalize on the new Carbon Tax.

Yup, that’s right.

The Blood and Gore company.

You just CAN’T make this stuff up folks!

And in case you think I’m making it up, I’ve got a link to a Forbes article below to show you it’s sadly very real.

First, take a look at this:

Here are all the details folks, from Forbes no less:

Surprise! Al Gore and his carbon credit huckstering partner David Blood, both principals at Generation Investment Management (GIM), warn in their October 30 Wall Street Journal op/ed feature of peril to fossil fuel investments due to “The Coming Carbon Asset Bubble”. They argue that such “unwise and increasingly wreck less” investment strategies pose three broad risks which will cause carbon assets to become “stranded” and lose economic value: through direct government carbon regulation; as a result of market-share losses to “already competitive” renewable technologies; and due to “sociopolitical pressures” causing carbon-intensive businesses to lose their “license to operate”.

Marketing Climate Alarm:

Of course this carbon regulation is posited upon saving the Earth based upon a “consensus within the scientific community that increasing the global temperature by more than 2oC will likely cause devastating and irreversible damage to the planet.” And where it comes to promulgating and capitalizing upon carbon-climate-crazed sociopolitical pressure, you would be hard-pressed to find two better authorities.

Gore and Blood, the former chief of Goldman Sachs Asset Management (GSAM), co-founded London-based GIM in 2004. Between 2008 and 2011 the company had raised profits of nearly $218 million from institutions and wealthy investors. By 2008 Gore was able to put $35 million into hedge funds and private partnerships through the Capricorn Investment Group, a Palo Alto company founded by his Canadian billionaire buddy Jeffrey Skoll, the first president of EBay Inc. It was Skoll’s Participant Media that produced Gore’s feverishly frightening 2006 horror film, “An Inconvenient Truth”.

In 2007, following an investigation of the movie, Sir Michael Burton, a judge in London’s High Court, ruled that it can be shown in secondary schools only if accompanied by guidance notes for teachers to balance Mr. Gore’s “one-sided” views. Judge Barton pointed out that its “apocalyptical vision” was politically partisan, and not an impartial analysis. He stated: “It is built around the charismatic presence of the ex-vice president Al Gore, whose crusade is to persuade the world of the dangers of climate change caused by global warming…It is now common ground that this is not simply a science film- although it is based substantially on science research and opinion, but it is [clearly] a political film.”

As for taking their recent investment advice, it might be worth mentioning that some of GIM’s earlier low-carbon deals haven’t always worked out so great.

Optimistic that a Democrat-controlled Congress would pass cap-and-trade legislation Gore lobbied for, GIM and David Blood’s old GSAM firm took big stakes in the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) for carbon trading. Accordingly, CCX was poised to make windfall profits selling CO2 offsets if and when cap-and-trade was passed. Speaking before a 2007 Joint House Hearing of the Energy Science Committee, Gore told members: “As soon as carbon has a price, you’re going to see a wave [of investment] in it…There will be unchained investment.”

After all, what better way to reduce evil carbon than to make it a profitable commodity? But unfortunately for GIM and CCX investors, trading hot air credits proved just too good to be true.

Between May of 2008 and October of 2009 the CCX market value for one metric ton of carbon plummeted from $7 per metric ton to $0.10 along with the shareholders’ investment values. Losers included the Ford Motor Company, Amtrak, DuPont, Dow Corning, American Electric Power, International Paper, and Waste Management, along with the states of Illinois and New Mexico, seven cities, and a number of universities.

By 2010, GIM approximately doubled a 9.6% stake it had purchased in Camco International Ltd., a manager of products to limit greenhouse gases. But by October of that year disaster struck again. Republicans took control of the House, dashing all cap-and-capitalize hopes along with huge profit prospects for either Camco or CCX. The latter shut down operations in November of that year.

On top of that bad news, First Solar Inc., another GIM investment, got squeezed out of the solar panel market by cheaper Chinese products. According to Bloomberg, GIM dumped its last First Solar stock at a $165.9 million loss in 2012.

You can read the entire story here.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bloggers; blood; bloodandgore; carbontax; climate; climatehoax; ecoterrorism; ecoterrorists; globalwarminghoax; gore; greatreset; greennewdeal; newworldorder; scam; taxes; tldr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: SoConPubbie

this is why Trump is the ONLY choice for 2024.

this is his biggest threat to the global elite.


21 posted on 11/24/2022 3:36:35 PM PST by MAGAthon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EvilCapitalist

Trump is damn near the only one with the courage to say this and he is far from the only one who knows it. Every so called Conservative should be saying this on a near daily basis to push back on these a-holes pushing us back into the Middle Ages.


22 posted on 11/24/2022 3:59:27 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The rise from 0.018% to 0.042% is almost entirely manmade. If we just had a natural rise from post-Little Ice Age warming, there would have been a rise from 0.018% to 0.019% at most. That's based on the long term record showing about 100 ppm rise for 10C of warming or 100 ppm fall for 10C of cooling

See the charts here: https://joannenova.com.au/global-warming-2/ice-core-graph/. She shows that CO2 lags temperature. That means the main driver of CO2 is from rising or falling temperatures. The CO2 to temperature link is very weak and if it were not weak we would have had runaway greenhouse a billion years ago.

The point is that warming following the Little Ice Age was about 1C. That would cause about 10 ppm rise in CO2. Instead we had 140 ppm rise in CO2. More importantly there's 2.5 ppm rise in CO2 every year, year over year (above the annual cycle). That amount cannot be caused by warming oceans in the past century or centuries. The only logical explanation is manmade CO2.

Man is responsible for 3.4% of that 0.04%

Manmade CO2 is about 3% of naturally created CO2. Man's uptake of CO2 is essentially zero. Nature's uptake is roughly equal to naturally created CO2. When you use the 3.4% figure you are not including natural uptake. IOW you are comparing the year over year rise in your chart to the entire annual rise and ignoring the annual drop.

23 posted on 11/24/2022 4:06:10 PM PST by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Global warming or cooling is caused by volcanic activity…there are undersea volcanoes that change the temperature of the ocean

Geothermal flux including all volcanoes is about 44TW. Average sunlight (day/night planet-wide) is 80,000 TW. Essentially the geothermal flux is trivial.

A better explanation is that global warming is caused by variations in the 40,000 TW latent heat transfer (evaporation, convection, and condensation at high altitude). Short term temperatures are controlled by the ocean temperature whixh is controlled by ocean cycles like El Nino and La Nina. Those don't cause long term "global warming" but they certainly have a huge short term effect (e.g we've been cooling since 2016)

24 posted on 11/24/2022 4:12:03 PM PST by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: palmer

It’s been much, much higher in the geological past and the Earth was not incinerated, crisis-troll.


25 posted on 11/24/2022 4:18:02 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Don’t forget variability of the sun’s energy output.

Climate alarmists think the sun is some kind of constant, like the thermostat in their mom’s basement.


26 posted on 11/24/2022 4:18:17 PM PST by Eccl 10:2 (Prov 3:5 --- "Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Eccl 10:2

Probably a lot of things…
.
You can add the sun …the earths orbit around the sun


27 posted on 11/24/2022 4:27:48 PM PST by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy; SoConPubbie; EvilCapitalist; Kaiser8408a; No name given ; nickcarraway; ...
This is one very specific reason I appreciate Donald Trump, and wish fervently for him to be President again in 2024.
These excerpts below are from the Rose Garden statement by President Trump on his decision to withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord-June 1, 2017
"...For example, under the agreement, China will be able to increase these emissions by a staggering number of years — 13. They can do whatever they want for 13 years. Not us. India makes its participation contingent on receiving billions and billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid from developed countries. There are many other examples. But the bottom line is that the Paris Accord is very unfair, at the highest level, to the United States..."

Further, while the current agreement effectively blocks the development of clean coal in America — which it does, and the mines are starting to open up. We’re having a big opening in two weeks. Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, so many places. A big opening of a brand-new mine. It’s unheard of. For many, many years, that hasn’t happened. They asked me if I’d go. I’m going to try.

"...China will be allowed to build hundreds of additional coal plants. So we can’t build the plants, but they can, according to this agreement. India will be allowed to double its coal production by 2020. Think of it: India can double their coal production. We’re supposed to get rid of ours. Even Europe is allowed to continue construction of coal plants..."

"...In short, the agreement doesn’t eliminate coal jobs, it just transfers those jobs out of America and the United States, and ships them to foreign countries. This agreement is less about the climate and more about other countries gaining a financial advantage over the United States. The rest of the world applauded when we signed the Paris Agreement — they went wild; they were so happy — for the simple reason that it put our country, the United States of America, which we all love, at a very, very big economic disadvantage. A cynic would say the obvious reason for economic competitors and their wish to see us remain in the agreement is so that we continue to suffer this self-inflicted major economic wound. We would find it very hard to compete with other countries from other parts of the world..."

The agreement is a massive redistribution of United States wealth to other countries...

I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris. As President, I have one obligation, and that obligation is to the American people. The Paris Accord would undermine our economy, hamstring our workers, weaken our sovereignty, impose unacceptable legal risks, and put us at a permanent disadvantage to the other countries of the world. It is time to exit the Paris Accord — (applause) — and time to pursue a new deal that protects the environment, our companies, our citizens, and our country.

It is time to put Youngstown, Ohio, Detroit, Michigan, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania — along with many, many other locations within our great country — before Paris, France. It is time to make America great again. (Applause.) Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much..."

Those areas in bold red are why. But the large, bolded, red, and underlined passage is PRECISELY why I want Trump back in office.

Read those last three statements in bold red. When have we heard, from other than Donald Trump, those types of unequivocal statements on reality from ANY public figure? And there are people on our side who don't want him back? How is that possible?

I almost fell out of my chair when I heard him publicly, in front of the world, declare "Climate Change" a wealth redistribution scheme from the Oval Office! THAT is why we need him in the Oval Office.

28 posted on 11/24/2022 4:46:36 PM PST by rlmorel (Nolnah's Razor: Never attribute to incompetence that which is adequately explained by malice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EvilCapitalist

Yea. Call them the climate commies. They are just seizing the means of production.


29 posted on 11/24/2022 4:46:36 PM PST by Persevero (You cannot comply your way out of tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
It’s been much, much higher in the geological past and the Earth was not incinerated, crisis-troll.

As I stated above: The CO2 to temperature link is very weak and if it were not weak we would have had runaway greenhouse a billion years ago.

So we agree: extra manmade CO2 is not a problem in any way. We know that it has several benefits and it would be foolish to try to reverse that rise.

30 posted on 11/24/2022 5:05:07 PM PST by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo

What is the name of Corsi’s new book?


31 posted on 11/24/2022 5:14:44 PM PST by yldstrk (Bingo! We have a winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Exactly.


32 posted on 11/24/2022 5:16:45 PM PST by yldstrk (Bingo! We have a winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Climate Hoaxsters

When one understand that's merely a euphemism for communists, things become much clearer.


33 posted on 11/24/2022 5:58:37 PM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Hockey sticks are always manmade.


34 posted on 11/24/2022 8:05:31 PM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Hockey sticks are always manmade.

Wait no, I meant hockey sticks are always manufactured.

35 posted on 11/24/2022 8:06:57 PM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Charles Darwin’s theories of evolution led directly to the Nazi ideology of the ‘MASTER RACE’. Darwin had unwittingly created a monster, and his ardent disciples of ‘the survival of the fittest’ took it to it’s natural conclusion; to wit, mass murder.
The same thing will happen with these brainwashed idiots and climate change. At some point in the not-so-distant future, one of these climate cultists will ascend to power with a make believe mandate to fix climate change, and the result will be, you guessed it, mass murder.
Trump is absolutely correct, the need to expose and discredit the climate hoax cult is as urgent as any other issue we face.


36 posted on 11/24/2022 8:14:16 PM PST by Thapsus_epiphany (In order to form a more perfect union…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

A small gradual increase in CO2 levels over time is a good thing. The opposite woud be cause for global alarm and panic. CO2 below 160PPM would be catastrohic.


37 posted on 11/24/2022 8:28:15 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Bookmark


38 posted on 11/24/2022 8:57:09 PM PST by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how thery control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Well, what causes the OCEAN temperature to rise and fall?

As an astronomer, I nominate THE SUN.


39 posted on 11/25/2022 4:58:19 AM PST by FroggyTheGremlim (I'll be good, I will, I will!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

This is one very specific reason I appreciate Donald Trump


40 posted on 11/25/2022 7:19:38 AM PST by Vaduz (LAWYERS )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson