Posted on 10/29/2022 6:28:45 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The attack on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband Paul Pelosi was initially shocking, and the media was quick to blame Trump supporters or conservative activists. But details emerging show that though the event is still shocking, it shocks in a different direction.
Here’s what Fox News says about the attack:
The husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Paul, was assaulted with a hammer early Friday inside his San Francisco home by an attacker identified by police as David DePape, who a law enforcement source tells Fox News was shouting “Where is Nancy, where is Nancy?”
San Francisco Police Chief William Scott said DePape, 42, who is a man reported being a former Castro nudist and hemp jewelry maker is now facing charges of attempted homicide, assault with a deadly weapon, elder abuse, burglary, and several other additional felonies stemming from the incident after 2 a.m.
Scott said police responded to a well-being check and found DePape and Paul Pelosi, 82, struggling over a hammer. He said officers then witnessed DePape pull the hammer away from Pelosi and “violently assaulted” him.
Officers then immediately tackled DePape, disarmed him and took him into custody, while requesting emergency backup and rendering medical aid at the scene. The motive for the attack remains under investigation.
A source that spoke to Fox News said the intruder confronted the Speaker’s husband shouting “where is Nancy, where is Nancy?”
“Early this morning, an assailant broke into the Pelosi residence in San Francisco and violently assaulted Mr. Pelosi,” Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill said. “Mr. Pelosi was taken to the hospital, where he is receiving excellent medical care and is expected to make a full recovery.
The spokesman also said, “The Speaker and her family are grateful to the first responders and medical professionals involved, and request privacy at this time.”
The White House said President Biden “is praying for Paul Pelosi and for Speaker Pelosi’s whole family” following the “horrible attack.”
The details of the attack are being questioned on social media:
“The Pelosi story doesn’t make sense at all. No random person can just break into the home of the 3rd in line to the United States Presidency. There’s more to this.”
— Eric Matheny 🎙 (@EricMMatheny) October 28, 2022
Questions arise from the report by Politico that Paul Pelosi called 911 from the bathroom, where he had requested to go when he felt the need. Usually attackers do not offer bathroom breaks.
Yo what kind of home invasions include bathroom breaks?? pic.twitter.com/U6Gjj6alRl
— Raheem J. Kassam (@RaheemKassam) October 29, 2022
It appears we are not getting the real story, according to a conversation a mainstream media reporter had with his boss, Defiant America reports.
Reporter on a hot mic after San Francisco Police Press Conference regarding Paul Pelosi, on the phone with the boss:
“Hey so is this the dude that is a former nudist dude?”
“Yea okay, is it okay to say any of that stuff?”
“Nope?”
The dispatch official then said that Pelosi informed 911 that he did not know who the attacker was but gave his name and then explained that “he is a friend.” Police audio of SFPD’s ‘welfare check’ call about Paul Pelosi says that he called “David” a “friend” who seemed “confused.”
Defiant America sums up the facts:
1-Cops weren’t called for a break-in but were there to check
2-PP and the guy were fighting for the hammer
3-Assault didn’t happen until cops got there
4-Guy found with his underwear
5-Called the attacker a friend on the police dispatch
6-And now this reporter asking if it’s okay to report something…
Again, social media reflects on this:
Fox just reported the suspect was arrested in his underwear.
— David Marcus (@BlueBoxDave) October 28, 2022
Commentator Wayne Dupree offers his take on these questions:
There’s something really weird about this Paul Pelosi attack story. Nothing is adding up. But one thing we do know is that the so-called “intruder” is some hippy-dippy dude from Berkeley who sells hemp bracelets and used to belong to a nudist colony. So, they’ll be really hard-pressed to blame this on a Trump supporter. But this story is bizarre, Fox News just reporter confirmed that the hippy guy was in his underwear when police arrived.
Now, before the media realized the “intruder” was a nudist hemp hippy from Berkely, they were breathlessly reporting on this story, suggesting it was a “political attack.” Blue checks on Twitter were sure it was a MEGA MAGA bad guy and were already celebrating. But alas, it’s a nude hippy who loves Castro and hates war.
So, when a reporter was discussing the case with his boss right after the SFO police press conference, he checked with him to see if he was allowed to bring up the “nudist” or any of that “stuff,” and the boss apparently said “no.”
I don’t know if you can find a more perfect example of fake news or propaganda media than this. This reporter knows the “game” so well, that he double-checks with his boss about the “liberal hippy stuff” before he reports the facts… that’s right because facts always take a backseat to progressive propaganda.
It appears the Pelosi family has been redistributing the wealth amongst the San Fransicko gay comminity
Sure sounds like it.
It’s definitely weird in the first place and sounds like a plot for a second-tier British crime series.
And having the media trying to make it look less weird is only making it worse.
Nobody trusts any person or any “fact” now, quite rightly, but that means that there’s no shared premise or even understanding to go on.
We can’t go on like this, honestly.
“An underwear-clad Leftist nudist friend on a first-name basis, who has several felonies, yet he’s not barred from entering?”
Hunter Biden probably has a guest that raises Secret Service eyebrows, but the guest is let in.
I’m convinced the “skull fracture” story is just a cover to keep Paul P. out of the public eye for several months while he “recovers.”
So, was this the Uvalde Police Department that came and stood there watching two men, in their underwear, fighting and assaulting with a hammer? Are you further telling me that the dispatched police units had absolutely no idea they were rolling up to Nancy Pelosi's house.
No freakin' way.
Prediction:
Paul will come out and say he has an addiction to cocaine.
Nancy will stick him in rehab.
The prostitute gets hard time.
And then Nancy retires on Marco Island and lives happily ever after.
5.56mm
Wait until they get around to reporting that the “hammer” was actually a sex toy.
“cameras recording every possible intrusion”
They surely were recording, but no one is talking about when the attacker showed up as far as I know.
“Til death do you part”
If you are married to a rich guy, it is wise to quietly turn one’s eyes aside at times - ask Nancy.
We need Columbo on this case!
I’m not buying it either.
“The Beast With Two Backs” aka “Brokeback Mansion”
Especially since initial reports said he was expected to make a full re overt.
A source that spoke to Fox News said the intruder confronted the Speaker’s husband shouting “where is Nancy, where is Nancy?”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I was wondering where the first reference was to this ‘Where’s Nancy” thing... it appears on this CNN clip that John Berman is giving credit to Jamie Gangel as being the first to report on it (2 minute, 50 second mark).
So the #3 in line to the presidency has no home security personnel or cameras ?Interesting.
That’s part of it... the other part is the sympathy angle that diverts people from poking too deeply into this.
Not Fidel Castro. "The Castro" -- a San Francisco neighborhood, known as the gay district
Usually attackers do not offer bathroom breaks.
Once it's established that the guy is crazy, "usually" is off the table, but judging from movies, yes, bathroom breaks are a thing when somebody breaks into your house or holds you hostage.
“Yea okay, is it okay to say any of that stuff?”
“Nope?”
The Corporate Fake News is getting more transparently fake every day. No sympathy for anyone who believes a word they say.
Righteo, but therein can easily lie corruption that deserves to be scrutinized when assault with a deadly weapon has been claimed against a multi-times-over felon.
368 (d) Penal Code defines punishment for Persons not in a caretaker relationship.
(e) defines it for caretakers.
368 (f) defines punishments for “a person” - doesn’t matter if they are in a relationship or not.
Elder abuse most commonly comes up with caretakers so that may be what the attorney is familiar with.
Anyway, in this particular case, I would guess this is a charge that will get dismissed as part of the deal making.
The Defense may even go for mentally incompetent for this example of Berkeley Wild Man.
He seems pretty woo woo to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.