Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Supreme Court's Kagan says justices must find 'common ground' again
msn ^ | 10/21/2022 | Nate Raymond

Posted on 10/22/2022 5:49:09 AM PDT by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

Liberal Justice Elena Kagan on Friday expressed hope that her colleagues on the conservative-dominated U.S. Supreme Court could get back to finding "common ground," saying it risked looking political by continuing to overturn legal precedents.

Speaking at an event at the University of Pennsylvania, Kagan did not explicitly reference the Supreme Court's decision in June to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion nationwide.

But Kagan, who dissented from that decision powered by the court's conservative majority, argued that judges and justices should be "humble" and respect past precedents interpreting laws and rights that people build their lives around.

"If you give people a right, and then you take the right away, well, in the meantime they've understood their lives in a different kind of way," Kagan said during a discussion with UPenn President M. Elizabeth Magill. "So law should be stable."

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: commonground; kagan; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: eyeamok

Let’s restore Bible reading and prayer in school,
Let’s get rid of excessive technicalities that get criminals off the hook.
Let’s restore the original definition of marriage.

I ax ya: who politicized the Court? This woman is definitely retarded.


41 posted on 10/22/2022 6:30:36 AM PDT by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GMThrust
It’s called the Constitution.

THIS!!!

42 posted on 10/22/2022 6:35:27 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh
This Bull Dyke was never Qualified. to sit on the SC .
A Hard core Lesbian Left Wing Activist impersonating a Judge .
43 posted on 10/22/2022 6:43:30 AM PDT by ncalburt ( Gop DC Globalists are the evil )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

I would submit that Justice Karen has lost her way in the SCOTUS. The only common ground she should be looking for is the Constitution!


44 posted on 10/22/2022 6:49:41 AM PDT by 7thOF7th (Righteousness is our cause and justice will prevail!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

Ha! That’s hilarious. What “common ground” did the Warren court seek when Lefties were in the majority and decided to just legislate from the bench?

Now that more conservative justices are in the majority on of the Lefties wants to talk about “common ground”. Now its suddenly “political” to overturn past leftist diktats from the court.

Screw you Kagan. Now its our turn. Wipe out ever last thing they did. Get back to original principles.


45 posted on 10/22/2022 6:50:11 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

LOL yes sir that humbleness should start with Kagan who considers the Constitution irrelevant & the self described “wise” latina.


46 posted on 10/22/2022 6:51:08 AM PDT by JayGalt (For evil men to accomplish their purpose it is only necessary that good men should do nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EastTexasTraveler
When they say “common ground” I always remember firstly this : Many years ago the gay special rights movement just “wanted to be left alone and live happily”.

In 2022, they want to groom adolescents and cut the sex organs off toddlers.

47 posted on 10/22/2022 6:56:45 AM PDT by atc23 (The Matriarchal Society we embrace has led to masks and mandates and the cult of "safety")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

I don’t want a touchy-feely attempt finding common ground. No negotiation so both sides win. I want them to argue, rationally debate and interpret the law as written. Perhaps this job requires a skill set far beyond DEI and identity politics?!

Perhaps she’s better off as a co host on The View.


48 posted on 10/22/2022 6:56:55 AM PDT by Made In The USA (Ellen Ate Dynamite Good Bye Ellen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Made In The USA

If we are divided at home how can we support globalist wars of aggression abroad? What will the world do without American democratic leadership?


49 posted on 10/22/2022 7:02:00 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

I agree. Let’s meet upon “common ground.”

Let’s all assemble on the village commons, and watch Kagan, the “Wise Latina” and so many other Domestic Enemies of the Constitution swing from the gallows.

Treason should have severe consequences.


50 posted on 10/22/2022 7:03:53 AM PDT by SharpenedEdge (Stockpile. Prepare. Arm. Train. A Storm is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

Other than Roe v Wade, what other precedent did the court overturn?

This is another example of the “Let’s find common ground and agree with me” ploy.


51 posted on 10/22/2022 7:05:30 AM PDT by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh
Common ground. Bi-partisanship. Can’t we all just get along?

No, unless they start agreeing with conservatives. That is common ground. I do NOT vote for Republicans to become Democrats. I did not vote for Trump to put extreme amoral Marxist and eff’n idiots that don’t even know what a woman is on the USSC.

This ‘common ground’ rhetoric, is political rhetoric. Kagan is being political. She’s not risking it. She is presently risking it. Only those that don’t have the ability to think cannot see it.

Like it or not, when someone on the left, right, or in the middle suggests ‘common ground’ to avoid being political, they are making a political stance. They can’t make an argument that supports their view so they try convincing others to go along with their view based on ‘common ground’. It’s disingenuous. It’s a scam. It’s a dead give away that their ideas have no merit and will not work.

So I suggest Kagan shut her fat, ugly, baby murdering, commie mouth until she can make a real argument.

52 posted on 10/22/2022 7:07:44 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA ( Scratch a leftist and you'll find a fascist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

Kagan “Everyone must support the left’s vile socialist agenda, or else they aren’t being bipartisan”

How about we just rule based on what the law says instead of legislating from the bench and then crying foul when that legislation gets overturned?


53 posted on 10/22/2022 7:08:56 AM PDT by Bob434 (question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMThrust

She’s an idiot who wants to legislate from the bench. 😡


54 posted on 10/22/2022 7:14:09 AM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

Kagan’s definition of “common ground” is like all liberals — it means you must accept their view because only then can there be common ground. It is the same as when the liberals say bi-partisanship. There is no bi-partisanship without accepting the liberal position.

Second, I always have to laugh when they talk about a “conservative court”. This court is not conservative. It has three hard core librals (Kagan, Sotomayer, Jackson); two staunch conservatives (Thomas, Alito) and four mushy swing votes (Roberts, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and especially Barrett). I would say it was more a liberal court since on important conservative ideas Roberts almost always goes with the three staunch libs while Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett split.


55 posted on 10/22/2022 7:16:45 AM PDT by falcon99 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

>>Translation: Conservative justices need to agree with me more.<<

There was no such talk when Liberals were in the majority and just issued dicta from the bench.


56 posted on 10/22/2022 7:29:55 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Difference between a cow and the US Capitol 1/6 "riot:" you can only milk a cow 3 times a day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EastTexasTraveler
They don’t want “common ground”. They want conservatives to cave in to them.

Yup, Leftist 101:

-Leftists have the majority: they run roughshod over everyone else and claim a 'mandate' or some sort of moral superiority

-Leftists aren't in the majority (i.e. the current Court): they whine about a 'lack of bipartisanship', or in this case- as the Court is supposedly non-partisan- she dresses it up as "common ground."

Always remember- if the Left is in power, they will crush you without conscience. If the Left isn't in power, they'll use anything that sounds good to blunt the Right.

I say it's about damned time we on the Right start using their own tactics against them. For far too long people on the Right have allowed the Left to use their own ethics and consciences against them, while the Left acts without those constraints.

People on the Right keep treating politics as a boxing match, crying foul when the Left hits below the belt, while refusing to do the same.

Well guess what? There's no referee to whine to. It's not a boxing match, it's a street fight. And if the opponent wants to play dirty, then fine- return the low blows. Personal honor is nice and all, but not when it means losing the fight, and losing all our children and future generations to the darkness of Leftism.

When the whole world was at stake, we firebombed cities, and eventually nuked a couple. Was it distasteful? Absolutely. But it was necessary to prevent something much worse, and we didn't just do it for sh*ts and giggles- the enemy provided the necessity.

Always remember- "The enemy gets a vote"
-Not just sound tactical advice on the follies of planning, but on the fundamental level of the fight itself. If the Left wants to embrace "the ends justify the means", then so should we- because the enslavement of our children is far worse than 'losing honorably.'
57 posted on 10/22/2022 7:31:19 AM PDT by verum ago (I figure some people must truly be in love, for only love can be so blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

When they were in majority, if was all “living constitution”!
Now suddenly they should be humble and respect precedents.


58 posted on 10/22/2022 7:36:41 AM PDT by AZJeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

Gee, how about The Constitution as common ground.


59 posted on 10/22/2022 7:40:23 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (Rigged Elections have Consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

Liberal Justice Elena Kagan wants to rewrite the Constitution after the left burns it the planks of Karl Marx ensues.


60 posted on 10/22/2022 8:02:23 AM PDT by Vaduz (LAWYERS )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson