Well, the Kursk was top-of-the-line, too.
So is the Russian aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov. Well, top-of-the-line by Russian standards, anyway.
I think it’s wrong to “induce fear” at every turn...as part of the Dem agenda.
The media hasn’t told us about the “nuclear doomsday clock” being moved closer to “midnight.” Because the current president is a democrat.
Anyone who has been paying attention knows that over the last several years Russia has created some pretty high tech weapons of mass destruction. Including the largest bomb, and missiles armed with multiple warheads capable of invading any attempt to shoot them down.
Leftist agitprop. The American Left actually desires a nuclear war. Not only do they believe it will solve their delusions about over population but they also believe a “nuclear winter” will save the planet from “climate change”.
Oh, and is this the same Italian media that claims the new PM is a nazi?
Moving out of port before the winter ice sets in?
Trying to scare Biden....assuming he knows what’s going on, a big “IF?”
It didn’t disappear.
The Russians know exactly were it is.
Maybe if we give the Ukrainians twenty or thirty billion dollars they can find it for us.
Russia possesses an estimated 6,300 nuclear warheads as of 2022, the largest stockpile of nuclear warheads in the world; the second-largest stockpile is the United States’ 5,428 warheads. Russia’s deployed missiles (those actually ready to be launched) number about 1,588, second to the United States’ 1,644.
The Russians are just as aware as we are that an attack on either continent is going to trigger a response and the whole world is going up in smoke, will poison with radiation, or is going to stave the world to death over the next few years. And they are going to trust one nudet for this? A 1600 foot tital wave is not even close to the damage over 1600 ICBM’s are going to cause. This is stupid.
wy69
Submarines are of no value just sitting at a dock in a harbor.
Russia’s largest nuclear submarine simply disappeared? Really? Or were the NSA/CIA watchdogs off in a doing each other?
They target: NYC, Chicago and other DNC cities.
It’s a risk I’m willing to pursue.
Think Krusk
This article says a nuke only releases a small fraction of the power necessary to create a natural Tsunami.
Russia would do more damage hitting the city with the nuke than exploding it in water.
So what??? They have been doing this for decades. We have been too. OHIO Class submarines are ready for orders from Xiden.
Is this an attempt to paint the Russians as the bad guys for doing something we both been doing since the 1960s?
I don’t get it.
Such a heinous weapon would NOT create a radioactive tsunami.
The waveform would travel from the point of detonation, the water, however, would NOT move.
The water that would crash onto the shore would be plain seawater, no radioactive particles.
The radioactive particles would have to ride a surfboard to travel with the wavefront...lol
If the water moved away from a tsunami then there would be tales of ships being swept vast distances across the seas after such events..
