Not without first consulting the goracle.
Posted on 09/30/2022 8:32:22 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Absolutely, and although this has been going on for decades they never get tired of this nonsense.
“The climate has always changed and always will.”
Yeah, I seem to recall that it was once called seasons.
“Did AOC come up with that number?”
Nah, she can’t count that high.
Did the two egghead’s take this into consideration?
https://www.space.com/tonga-eruption-water-vapor-warm-earth
Scientist: “My findings are meaningless if taken out of context.”
Media: Scientist claims “Findings are meaningless.”
Yet another job where you gat paid to just make stuff up.
Just another bunch of unadulterated bullcrap from the left.
Study Finds That Climate Change Added 10% to Ian’s Rainfall
```````````````````````````````
My calculations show only 04.40072394%
My studies said 7%. My neighbor’s cat says 12%
That’s because of climate change.
Temperature goes up? Climate change. Temp. goes down? Climate change. Less hurricanes? Climate change. Big hurricane? Climate change.
No change at all? That’s climate change.
Keep the government grants flowing for climate change studies, ok?
“Junk science”
Indeed. And if there had been 10% less rainfall than the previous hurricane, it would still be attributed to “climate change”.
I also find it laughable that this “study” was completed only days after Hurricane Ian went away. How is it that every other climate study requires millions upon millions in government grant money and several years or even decades to reach a conclusion yet they can make conclusions about a single hurricane within days of it occuring?
Awfully convenient.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.