Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Court Rejects Trump’s Special Master Review, Instead Trusting FBI Completely
Federalist ^ | SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 | BY: MARGOT CLEVELAND

Posted on 09/22/2022 7:52:22 AM PDT by Red Badger

Rather than continue to fight this losing and expensive battle, Trump should pivot to the midterms and take his case to the public.

============================================================

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals dashed former President Donald Trump’s hopes that his attorneys could review the 100 documents marked classified that the FBI seized during a raid of his Mar-a-Lago home. Wednesday’s decision by the federal appellate court came just one day after the special master indicated no such review would take place absent evidence that Trump had declassified those documents.

While Trump could still seek intervention by the Supreme Court, given the special master’s unwillingness to give Trump’s legal team access to the documents that the FBI maintains have classification markings, Trump should drop his case and pivot to the midterms — and let the public decide whether Democrats have weaponized the Department of Justice to target the former president.

Wednesday’s decision by the 11th Circuit turned the tables on Trump, who less than one week ago appeared to have scored two huge victories in his fight to have an independent special master review the documents and items seized by the FBI during an August 8, 2022 raid of his home. The first win appeared to come when Judge Aileen Cannon appointed Trump’s preferred candidate to serve as special master, Raymond Dearie.

The second victory came from Judge Cannon’s rejection of the DOJ’s request to put on hold her earlier ruling that, pending a special master’s review of the material, the government could not use the documents seized as part of its criminal investigation. The DOJ had limited its request for a stay to only those 100-some documents that the government claimed bore classification markings.

On Friday, the DOJ filed a motion to stay with the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, asking the appellate court to stay Judge Cannon’s order, but again, only to the extent that her order barred the government from using the 100-some documents that purportedly bore classification markings for criminal investigative purposes. The DOJ also objected to providing those documents to Special Master Dearie for his review. The 11th Circuit expedited consideration of the DOJ’s motion to stay, directing Trump to respond to the motion by Tuesday at noon.

Tuesday proved significant for another reason, with Dearie, a former FISA court judge and current senior federal judge in New York, holding his first public hearing with the parties. During that hearing, the special master indicated that unless Trump presented evidence to the court that he had declassified the 100-some documents, there was no basis for Trump’s attorneys to review that material. Dearie also suggested Trump’s attorneys would not be receiving security clearance in the near term, which would also limit their ability to review the documents of concern.

The former president’s attorneys countered that “until they see the documents, Trump’s legal team was not in a position to fully disclose their defense or specifically address the declassification issue.” While acknowledging “that there was a legal strategy at play,” Judge Dearie stressed that, “if the government gives me prima facia evidence that these are classified documents, and you, for whatever reason, decide not to advance any claim of declassification, I’m left with a prima facia case of classified documents, and as far as I’m concerned, that’s the end of it.”

Following Tuesday’s hearing, Trump and his attorneys had some tough decisions to make concerning whether to present evidence of declassification to Special Master Dearie. But the 11th Circuit’s order on Wednesday removed the decision from Trump’s hands when the three-judge panel granted the DOJ’s requested stay.

Obama Judge Robin Rosenbaum and Trump appointees Britt Grant and Andrew Brasher issued the unsigned 29-page opinion for the court that concluded the government would likely succeed on its claim that Judge Cannon erred in prohibiting the United States from using the “classified records in its criminal investigation and to require the United States to submit the marked classified documents to a special master for review.” Here, the court found dispositive the fact that there was no evidence that the DOJ had displayed a callous disregard for Trump’s constitutional rights.

The 11th Circuit nonetheless added that Trump failed to show he had “an individual interest in or need for any of the one-hundred documents with classification markings.” Further, even if the documents had been declassified, Trump still hadn’t shown why he had a personal interest in the documents, the court reasoned.

In entering the stay, the federal appellate court also stressed the harm to the government the order created, relying on Alan E. Kohler Jr.’s, the assistant director of the counterintelligence division of the FBI, sworn statement that the United States’ “national-security review is inextricably intertwined with its criminal investigation.” “When matters of national security are involved, we ‘must accord substantial weight to an agency’s affidavit,’” the 11th Circuit stressed.

The 11th Circuit further found that the “public interest” favored a stay because “the documents at issue contain information ‘the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security.’” Here, the court again relied on FBI Assistant Director Kohler’s declaration to support this finding.

In discussing the “public interest,” the 11th Circuit completely ignored the public’s interest in assuring an unbiased review of the documents — the concern that motivated Judge Cannon’s decision. Wednesday’s opinion instead accepted at face value everything the DOJ and FBI said: that the documents were marked classified and FBI Assistant Director Kohler’s various representations about the harm to national security and the need to advance the criminal investigation in tandem with the national security one.

Yes, that’s how courts work: The judges accept sworn statements as true and rely on the government’s word, absent conflicting evidence. But it remains hard to swallow that the courts place continued trust in a DOJ that previously submitted four fraudulent applications to the FISA courts to get Trump.

In response to Wednesday’s decision, Trump could seek the Supreme Court’s intervention, but even if Trump were to prevail with the high court, Special Master Dearie seems unwilling to allow the former president’s attorneys anywhere near the 100-some documents marked classified, unless Trump proves he declassified them. And even then, Dearie may adopt the 11th Circuit’s view that Trump has no interest in reviewing those documents. So even a win might not accomplish Trump’s goals.

Thus the 11th Circuit’s decision struck a severe blow to Trump and those seeking transparency. But rather than continue to fight this losing and expensive battle, Trump should pivot to the midterms and take his case to the public: Make the voters the judge of the Biden administration’s conduct and the Democrats’ relentless targeting of Trump and anyone who ever supported him.

The timing for this pivot couldn’t be better, with the New York attorney general filing a civil lawsuit against Trump and three of his children on Wednesday, with news breaking that the Jan. 6 Committee plans to question Ginni Thomas, and with a class-action lawsuit filed against Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis over his role in transporting illegal immigrants to Martha’s Vineyard. The recent demand by Republican senators that Attorney General Merrick Garland provide special counsel protection for the U.S. attorney investigating Hunter Biden further adds to the message of the Democrats’ weaponization of justice, by highlighting the double standard in play.

We should know soon whether Trump will continue to fight this losing battle or focus on the broader war against Democrats this November, as the special master gave Trump only until Friday to pick a vendor to handle the scanning of the 11,000 other documents not affected by the stay.

********************************************************

Margot Cleveland is The Federalist's senior legal correspondent. She is also a contributor to National Review Online, the Washington Examiner, Aleteia, and Townhall.com, and has been published in the Wall Street Journal and USA Today. Cleveland is a lawyer and a graduate of the Notre Dame Law School, where she earned the Hoynes Prize—the law school’s highest honor. She later served for nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk for a federal appellate judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Cleveland is a former full-time university faculty member and now teaches as an adjunct from time to time. As a stay-at-home homeschooling mom of a young son with cystic fibrosis, Cleveland frequently writes on cultural issues related to parenting and special-needs children. Cleveland is on Twitter at @ProfMJCleveland. The views expressed here are those of Cleveland in her private capacity. 11TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 11circuit; 11thcircuitcourt; specialmaster; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Red Badger; ransomnote; steve w; Cletus.D.Yokel
I'm trying to follow whatever logic can be found in this clusterf@ck.

AG Merrick "Torquemada" Garland convinced the court that it needs access to all of Trump's "classified" documents in order to continue the persecution of the 45th President. Trump says they are all declassified. Some may still have markings, and many were likely mis-classified simply to hide the FBI/DoJ crimes.

So, the Special Master is not allowed to help the court determine what is indeed still classified (there are none IMHO), and only then release the documents to the inquisitors to maintain their torturing of Trump, the Constitution, and the law.

Since the DoJ thinks they know better (Trump stole classified documents which are still classified) and will not allow a Special Master to determine classification as well as the FBI justification to have Trump's will, tax returns, and attorney-client documents, etc., the DoJ has become a self-licking lollypop with absolutely no oversight from Congress or the courts. They act with impunity.

41 posted on 09/22/2022 9:08:06 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

Essentially the DOJ is hiding behind the ‘National Security’ screen....................


42 posted on 09/22/2022 9:09:56 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

Because the speech was a long time ago.

This “conspiracy” has been kicking around for months.

There are always a bunch of new ones popping up around the Jewish holidays as well.

Making predictions about these things are a waste of time. If you read enough of them you can shoehorn just about anything into one or two. But the masses forget there were a thousand others that could not be fit.

I am still waiting for the briefcase nukes from 9/11 and the Gitmo trials of Hillary and Obama. And now that the queen is dead—who will procure the child blood for the rest of the Lizard people.


43 posted on 09/22/2022 9:17:32 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT
Trump says they are all declassified.

Not to the judge or the SM he doesn’t.

He tells that to conservative media but his lawyers refuse to make that claim in any venue where it matters.

No one is legally disputing that the documents marked as classified really are, so there’s no basis not to give the DOJ access.

44 posted on 09/22/2022 9:18:42 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RideForever

That is standard procedure. The target, nor anyone else, is permitted to be in the location of the search.


45 posted on 09/22/2022 9:19:00 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

Or…it might just be that Trump wasn’t following the rules. And that is why “he cannot catch a break.”

When it seems that you lose at just about every turn you either have bad attorneys or, maybe, you are not doing something right.


46 posted on 09/22/2022 9:21:48 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

Bkmk


47 posted on 09/22/2022 9:23:54 AM PDT by sauropod (Unbelief has nothing to say. Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This is stupid. There is no such thing as “proving the documents are declassified”. Under the Presidential Records Act whatever documents the Presidents deems as “personal records” are released to him regardless of classification when he leaves office.

A US District Court already ruled on this in the case of the Clinton audio tapes of White House conversations that he kept in his sock drawer. They were ruled personal records and Judicial Watch was denied access to them via a FOIA request.


48 posted on 09/22/2022 9:31:27 AM PDT by Dave Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

It doesn’t matter who appointed the judges.

What matters is whether we have, or do not have, a unitary executive as described in Article II.

This has been a festering sore since Watergate (and maybe since 11/22/63), and it needs to be resolved.

The President is not a King, in that he cannot make laws or give orders to Congress. But if he is not in charge of the Executive Branch, then the crown is truly hollow.


49 posted on 09/22/2022 9:35:33 AM PDT by Jim Noble (And manly hearts to guard the fair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dave Wright

I’m just playing devil’s advocate here. Did Trump ever claim these as personal records? He should have done it right up front when they first started asking them returned. I’ve said all along the President has had terrible legal advice.


50 posted on 09/22/2022 9:44:53 AM PDT by sunny bonobo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

Declassification of Certain Materials Related to the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation
************************
Why can’t we all admit that even though Trump was a great president, sometimes he does some stupid things. Namely waiting til his last day in office to initiate this order. There is no way the redacted documents were returned to the White House before his exit. So therefore, if the docs he has are these he is in possession of the original unredacted classified material, which by his own actions are still classified.


51 posted on 09/22/2022 10:19:30 AM PDT by sunny bonobo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

So the bottom line is if you come before the 11th Circuit Court and the Government is prosecuting you then in Court’s eyes you are a liar and you are guilty.

IOW, The 11th Circuit Court is NOT part of the Judiciary but simply a rubber stamp for the Executive branch.

Does Justice Thomas realize what is going on?


52 posted on 09/22/2022 10:38:33 AM PDT by Colo9250
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunny bonobo
Did Trump ever claim these as personal records?

No, not to a court.

It’s just like his claims of election fraud. He said things to his supporters and to social media but when asked in a venue that matters, like a court, he said he wasn’t alleging fraud.

53 posted on 09/22/2022 10:46:09 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Wouldn’t you think Trump’s attorneys would have shared that concept with the court?

But after reading more about this, I realized that the Appeals Court would not have cared, no matter what proof of declassification was presented. Their ruling was that the DoJ gets to decide anything it wants in secret. No one else can review the documents or DoJ/FBI decisions if they say the words “national security”. Freedom is dead.


54 posted on 09/22/2022 11:12:21 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah

“National Security” is the blanket that covers all sins.

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel..............


55 posted on 09/22/2022 11:14:00 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

ROFLMAO

trust the FBI?? they’ve proven themselves to be partisan lapdogs of the left.

pure witch hunt followed by a lynching in the banana court system


56 posted on 09/22/2022 12:18:58 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’m convinced those three Judges received a visit in person or by phone by someone/somebodies who suggested that the DOJ and FBI could use a little help by way of a hosing down of all the DIRT that surrounds those agencies.

And the Judges opened the hoses, sprayed them with fresh water and now ...they are SQUEAKY CLEAN AND THEY CAN DO NO WRONG. They were respectful at the RAID, they were courteous to those present and NO, THEY NEVER LEAKED ANY INFORMATION.

Those three judges must be sharing ONE BRAIN...OR

They just flew in from vacation in the middle of THE SAHARA.


57 posted on 09/22/2022 12:31:12 PM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

I’m not a lawyer either, but it doesn’t take a lawyer to realize that any protections the Constitution offers are meaningless to a lawless government.


Exactly.

And that is why we have the Constitution. The Constitution gives us the tools to prevent the very things that are taking place with Trump, with those who peacefully attended January 6 (not those who actually committed crimes).

So my question really is: Where in the hell are the judges and lawyers who are supposed to put the wheels in motion to stop this abuse?

And I suppose I should ask where are the congress critters who also have a big stake in constitutional government, but they are probably all at the club having a drink


58 posted on 09/22/2022 3:45:33 PM PDT by old curmudgeon (There is no situation so bad that the federal government can not make worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Round Earther

WE gave ‘Security Clearance’ to a Kenyan Muslim who hates America.........


59 posted on 09/22/2022 3:58:58 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RideForever

I’m with you as well. Why can’t/didn’t the lawyers argue this one point. Trumps lawyers were ordered to wait outside while they searched Trump’s home. How is anyone protected from search and seizure if your attorney is not allowed to see what is being ?

Trump should have made his own SCIF on his property vs. placing files in a locked basement on his compound.


60 posted on 09/22/2022 5:57:07 PM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson