Posted on 09/19/2022 10:41:31 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
A bogus motion claiming to be from the U.S. Treasury appeared in the court docket for the Justice Department’s investigation of records seized from Mar-a-Lago. The motion was riddled with spelling and grammatical errors.
The bogus document claimed the Treasury had sensitive documents related to the FBI’s raid on Trump’s Florida home and told CNN to keep “leaked tax records.”
The bogus document claimed the Treasury had sensitive documents related to the FBI’s raid on Trump’s Florida home and told CNN to keep “leaked tax records.”
“The U.S. Department of Treasury through the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Marshals Service have arrested Seized Federal Securities containing sensitive documents which are subject to the Defendant Sealed Search Warrant by the F.B.I. arrest,” the document claimed, according to Just The News. Two warrants included in the filing were identical to those from an inmate at a North Carolina prison medical center.
Even the Associated Press acknowledged that the document was “a clear fabrication.” Court records and interviews suggest the filing came from a serial forger at a North Carolina federal prison. But that such a clearly bogus document was even able to be filed raises significant questions about the U.S. court system’s vetting process. According to Just The News, the inmate responsible for the forgery “has been in prison for several years after authorities found him not competent to stand trial following his arrest for allegedly planting a fake explosive outside of a Detroit building.”
Apparently, he’s competent enough to fool the U.S. court system.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Hey, if it weren't for fake documents, the Demagogic Party and their media shills would be out of jobs.
This is the bigger issue.
They're setting up something, and they're going unchallenged.
Very astute summary! Thank you.
By rarestia ......such a clearly bogus document was even able to be filed raises significant questions about the U.S. court system’s vetting process.
This is the bigger issue. They’re setting up something, and they’re going unchallenged.
Amazing. Thanx for your post as it gets to the heart of the matter.
Hoke County?
…. except that it isn’t. That’s the whole point of the ECF system, to prevent any filings except those done electronically. The only time a paper copy of anything is accepted by the clerk through the mail is when a pro se party files it, and then the clerk has to manually scan and docket it electronically. However, the parties to this case, Trump and the government, are both represented by counsel. I suppose the clerk here would have scanned and docketed a candy wrapper if it had the right case number on it.
Lol!!
That’s the only mistake in that. How sad is that.
Have you ever worked in a prison?
I do.
I will tell you, the vast VAST majority of us, civilians and officers alike, vote red, are quite conservative and most definitely NOT democrats.
We see what their policies produce, and we also suffer from their policies.
People CAN file cases and documents on federal cases, through USPS mail or other courier services, etc.
Do you have some experience or examples of corrections workers blackmailing inmates into doing illegal things? I really doubt this happens frequently, and also question as to whether corrections workers have leftist ideology or act as tools for the left, as you suggest.
Only pro se litigants can file paper in Federal Courts. Since there are no pro se parties in Trump's case, the clerk had no business filing a paper copy of a motion received in the mail. See the portion of the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, below. If an attorney wants to file non-ECF, that is mail in some paper to be filed, they first need to request permission from the judge assigned to the case. All Federal Courts have been electronic courts since 2006, and some, like the ones I practice in have been electronic for at least a decade before that.
"2A. Electronic Filing Requirements On October 12, 2006, the Southern District of Florida implemented CM/ECF, an electronic filing system designated for use nationwide by the United States Courts. Electronic filing is mandatory for all attorneys admitted to practice in the Southern District of Florida. For additional information, refer to the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. United States District Court General Civil Case Filing Requirements Southern District of Florida 2B. Pro Se Litigants Pro se litigants, or individuals who represent themselves, are not permitted to file electronically. Non-prisoner pro se litigants may receive notices electronically after filing the form “Consent by Pro Se Litigants (Non-Prisoner) to Receive Notice of Electronic Filing” which can be found on the Court’s website (www.flsd.uscourts.gov). For additional information, refer to the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. See Attachment A (Sample Document)."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.