Notice how she neglects to mention the Constitution. That needs to be the overriding precedent, not established law (AKA case law) where bad precedent snowballs into more anti-Constitutional BS (e.g., US GVT redefining marriage, blurring the lines between male and female, etc.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Justice Kagan cautions Supreme Court can forfeit legitimacy Supreme Court Justices can surely forfeit their individual legitimacy.
2 posted on
09/12/2022 11:07:04 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: where's_the_Outrage?
SCOTUS forfeited its legitimacy in 1973.
And again in 2012, when John Roberts moronically called Obozocare a tax.
3 posted on
09/12/2022 11:07:18 PM PDT by
rfp1234
(Comitia asinorum et rhinocerum delenda sunt.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
I wonder if she was against the overturning of Brown and Plessy?
5 posted on
09/12/2022 11:11:04 PM PDT by
ManardG
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Afraid to look political? Oh, yeah. Ask Roosevelt. Ask all who suffered Earl Warren, the most despicable justice of the 20th Century. Ask Judge Bork and the hell they put him through. Ask Justice Thomas. It has been hyper-lefist political all of my life. So I say to Kagan STFU. For every ruling that goes conservative, there have been nine that went ultra-liberal.
6 posted on
09/12/2022 11:11:44 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
(LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Kagan rarely has any public comments. She finally speaks up, but almost in the form of a Haiku.
Does all this ‘concern’ boil down to the abortion decision?
To: where's_the_Outrage?
No, Justice Kagan, justices lose legitimacy when they rule based on personal policy preferences rather than based on the law and the Constitution - casting aside the whole point of a judiciary. In Dobbs, the justices made no ruling on any personal policy preference but recognized the reality that the Constitution does not permit the Court to regulate abortion policy and adhered to that reality.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
The Court looks political when Leftist activist judges say political things like this.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Funny that big sweeping changes in the law by liberals is just fine.
10 posted on
09/12/2022 11:27:31 PM PDT by
Seruzawa
("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
To: where's_the_Outrage?
![96-E1-D9-A0-BAE4-4409-A99-D-C994-DDE0-EDF3](https://i.postimg.cc/j2Y1hWs6/96-E1-D9-A0-BAE4-4409-A99-D-C994-DDE0-EDF3.png)
![B774529-B-F1-E2-4-E04-9-B1-A-8-B94717549-B6](https://i.postimg.cc/jj9mLgmF/B774529-B-F1-E2-4-E04-9-B1-A-8-B94717549-B6.jpg)
![5740-B74-E-A0-F8-4891-9-DD2-F163-DB2-E8175](https://i.postimg.cc/tg78RQS6/5740-B74-E-A0-F8-4891-9-DD2-F163-DB2-E8175.jpg)
Dems Voting together as a Bloc regardless, does that risk legitimacy?
Wonder why she’s not demanding the Leaker be found?
11 posted on
09/12/2022 11:31:54 PM PDT by
AnthonySoprano
(Statute of Limitations is going to elapse on Hunter Biden )
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Do what I want or else
How childish
12 posted on
09/12/2022 11:33:30 PM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds )
To: where's_the_Outrage?
“Judges create legitimacy problems for themselves ... when they instead stray into places where it looks like they’re an extension of the political process or when they’re imposing their own personal preferences,” True. So in the interest of the Court, when will you be stepping down?
13 posted on
09/12/2022 11:38:21 PM PDT by
MileHi
((Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
As they continue to use a super-sized spoon to stir up a civil war. Bet.
14 posted on
09/12/2022 11:45:49 PM PDT by
cranked
To: where's_the_Outrage?
She’s essentially ‘justified’ those who apposed her appointment... She’s a blatant left leaning political sycophant who’s judgments are based solely on her politics, rather than the rule of law and the constitution. And she taints herself and the court she sits on with her ‘opinion’.
15 posted on
09/12/2022 11:47:11 PM PDT by
jerod
(Nazi's were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Justice Kagan is an insurrectionist.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
They did that when they brought her in.
18 posted on
09/13/2022 12:14:34 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(I pledge allegiance the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which stands.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
where the f*** is it written in the constitution that anyone has the constitutional right to murder another human being? which is what abortion always boils down to. They can’t separate that from the deed no matter how hard they try.
19 posted on
09/13/2022 12:24:52 AM PDT by
Bullish
(Rot'sa Ruck America. )
To: where's_the_Outrage?
needlessly overturn precedent should read "responsibly overturn precedent"
20 posted on
09/13/2022 12:58:20 AM PDT by
laweeks
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Who leaked the Roe Vs Wade opinion elena?
Heh? Heh?
John Roberts covering for you?
21 posted on
09/13/2022 1:17:40 AM PDT by
Chuck N
>> when they needlessly overturn precedent and decide more than they have to
STFU, Mark
22 posted on
09/13/2022 1:20:14 AM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
This ‘wise Latina’ forfeits her legitimacy each time she rules on a case. Like others, she has no concept of the words written in our Constitution. Not fit to judge a dog
show, yet we’re stuck with her for life (her’s).
‘The WON’ appointed her
as he felt she had the ability to change the minds and opinions of others.
23 posted on
09/13/2022 1:27:03 AM PDT by
V K Lee
(Our CONSTITUTION. Written with DIVINE assistence by very wise men. A document unlike any other.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson