Lavrov, we don't reject negotiations,there are complications

https://www.ansa.it/ ^ | 9/11/2022 | ANSA

[RomanSoldier19]

Negotiations Russia "does not reject" negotiations with Ukraine, but there are some "delays that complicate the process" of negotiations.

This was said by Foreign Minister Serghei Lavrov quoted by Tass.

In an interview with Rossiya-1 television, Lavrov reported that Vladimir Putin convened a meeting with the Duma, the lower house of parliament, and leaders of the different factions. "The president told the participants that we do not reject negotiations," Lavrov stressed, but he accused the Ukrainians of delaying the process of negotiations. Kiev, Putin said again according to Lavrov's account, "should understand that the longer it delays the process, the more difficult it will be to negotiate with us."..

Chechen Kadyrov's ire "I, Ramzan Kadyrov, officially declare that all these cities (Izyum, Kupiansk and Balakliya) will be recaptured. Our people are already there, boys are trained for this work, another 10,000 fighters are ready to leave. And we will reach Odessa in the near future." This was said by Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov, in an audio message on Telegram picked up by Meduza, after the liberation of the three Ukrainian cities in eastern Ukraine yesterday by Kiev

[ought-six]

“It is simply opinion based on what I’ve read. This is the [primarily] Russian speaking region. Since the first outbreak I believe that there will also be a push to take the entire sea coast in the south to join Transnitria.”

So you admit that Russia’s claim that the Special Military Operation was intended to “liberate” Donbas and to demilitarize Ukraine and demand its neutrality, subservience to Russia, etc. was only part of the plan, with an unspoken part being the “liberation” of Transnistria and the taking of the entire Black Sea coast of Ukraine. Which goes back to my earlier comment, that Russia’s intent is the de facto taking of all of Ukraine.

“Most of Ukraine is West of the river.”

No, it’s only about half, especially if you assume Crimea is no longer part of Ukraine.

“I am taking no one’s side.”

Yes, you are, because your posts have not really said anything positive about or favorable to Ukraine, but you have about Russia.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

—> So you admit

No again.

—> Yes, you are, because your posts have not really said anything positive about or favorable to Ukraine, but you have about Russia.

You should read carefully. I said they are both our enemy.

The homoglobalists are currently the biggest threat to freedom.

After their defeat, we can deal with Russia.

Also added earlier the ones I feel for are Uke and Russian ordinary citizens.

[ought-six]

“You should read carefully. I said they are both our enemy.”

But you have identified Ukraine as a greater enemy. And you are quick to apply the epithet “homoglobalists” to Ukraine. Yet, you are silent on the Russian military’s penchant for buggery of new recruits. Why is that?

“Also added earlier the ones I feel for are Uke and Russian ordinary citizens.”

At least on that we agree.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

—> But you have identified Ukraine as a greater enemy. And you are quick to apply the epithet “homoglobalists” to Ukraine. Yet, you are silent on the Russian military’s penchant for buggery of new recruits. Why is that?

Simple reason. The WEF/Soros/etc. has captured western nations with a full out attack on God’s created order of male and female - instead they promote homosexuality and gender dysphoria, using the agency of State, and ambassadors, and laws. They fly the pride flag over embassies and fight for pervert rights in other countries.

Ukraine is Soros’ first Open Society country, and a corrupt money laundering location.

The most imminent threat to the west is the homoglobalists.

I do not excuse any perversity in Russia or any other country or organization.

I don’t believe most americans understand who our enemy is or how close we are to folding from infiltration.

For these reasons, I am not for either side in the war. but I am for the defeat of the homoglobalists (who are sacrificing Ukrainians).

[ought-six]

“The most imminent threat to the west is the homoglobalists.
I do not excuse any perversity in Russia or any other country or organization.”

Then you are wasting your time focusing on Ukraine: You’d better start looking closer to home.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

I can do both.

[DesertRhino]

“So, you admit that Putin’s claim that he just wanted to liberate the LPR and the DPR is bull@#$%.”

No, when LPR and DRP were liberated, the idiot Ukes were still in artillery range and started shooting into those areas. So the perimeter had to be pushed back. HMARS probably mean it will have to be more... and Lavrov said the Kiev government might need to be the next target.

Remember, Kadaffy didn’t stop till some bombs hit his tent and killed his kids. Then he straightened up. Z probably needs that same treatment for this to end.

[ought-six]

You are not answering my question from post #39.

My full comment from post #39 was, “So, you admit that Putin’s claim that he just wanted to liberate the LPR and the DPR is bull@#$%. If Russia, as you project, will take everything east of the Dnieper (Dnipro); and Russia insists in its demand for Ukraine to disarm, demilitarize, declare complete neutrality, and install a pro-Russian government; how is that not a de facto taking of all of Ukraine?”

Perhaps I should have placed an emphasis on the word JUST in the first sentence. The point of my question was that Putin’s goal was far beyond JUST the “liberation” of LPR and DPR, and in fact it was a de facto taking of Ukraine in toto.