Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With Gender-Transition ‘Sanctuary State’ Law, California Declares War on Parents in All 50 States
National Review ^ | September 7, 2022 | Sharon Supp

Posted on 09/07/2022 8:08:24 AM PDT by karpov

The California legislature just passed S.B. 107, a dangerous bill that undermines the fundamental right of every parent in every state to direct the upbringing of their children. It allows California courts to strip custody from parents — even parents who don’t live in California — who have legitimate concerns about a young child undergoing irreversible medical procedures to appear as a different gender.

California wants to become a “sanctuary state” to which minor children from around the country can flee (or even be taken by someone else) to obtain on-demand puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, or surgeries to remove healthy body parts . . . without the knowledge or consent of their parents.

Assuming Governor Gavin Newsom signs S.B. 107 into law, California courts will have “temporary emergency jurisdiction” over any child in, and any person who may bring the child to, California for the purpose of obtaining harmful interventions on children’s minds and bodies. Ignoring the growing body of medical evidence demonstrating the damage caused by those medical and surgical interventions on children, California wants to reach into homes across state lines and offer such interventions to all children in America even if — perhaps especially if — their parents object.

In reality, California offers no “sanctuary” to American children. No, like the Pied Piper, California under S.B. 107 would entice children nationwide to leave their families and run away into the arms of California bureaucrats who believe that harmful drugs and sterilizing surgeries should be freely available to anyone who asks regardless of age, mental health, or legal capacity. And those courageous parents who oppose the coercive corruption of their child’s mind and body will be met with the full force of the courts, police, and child-protective services.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: California
KEYWORDS: bloggers; california; childabuse; children; gavinnewsom; genderdysphoria; genitalmutilation; homosexualagenda; nationalrepuke; nationalreview; sharonsupp; transgender
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 09/07/2022 8:08:24 AM PDT by karpov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: karpov

conservative states need to pass law making it child abuse to move your children to California!


2 posted on 09/07/2022 8:09:49 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Or, Red State could pass gender protection laws that make them a sanctuary state for parents to bring children from California so they can be protected from this trans insanity.


3 posted on 09/07/2022 8:11:58 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Should be...all 57 states.


4 posted on 09/07/2022 8:12:16 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Hmm, state lines, sexual/immoral purposes?
Can we say “Mann Act”?
Of course we can!


5 posted on 09/07/2022 8:12:19 AM PDT by Ex gun maker. (Free thinking is now a radical concept, I will not be assimilated by PC or EV groupthink!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Some parent is going to seek revenge.


6 posted on 09/07/2022 8:18:18 AM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

CA welcome sign has an electronic counter for number of babies murdered and child mutilations


7 posted on 09/07/2022 8:18:53 AM PDT by joshua c (to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Any adult who touches any part of my child’s body without my express consent will be made dead... for real.

Don’t GAS what state or law you think protects you - you.will.be.fkn.dead.where.you.are.found.


8 posted on 09/07/2022 8:24:26 AM PDT by AAABEST ( NY/DC/LA media/political/military industrial complex DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST

Ask not why your kids should to be exposed to outrageous poofters in drag, ask why outrageous poofters want to be nearer to your kids.


9 posted on 09/07/2022 8:29:20 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joshua c

Kinda like the bunny town population sign, only in reverse.


10 posted on 09/07/2022 8:30:03 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: karpov

The physical mutilation of children is something Mengele would practice.


11 posted on 09/07/2022 8:31:18 AM PDT by 444Flyer (John 3, Revelation 20, Joshua 24:15, 1 Kings 18:16-39, Pick a side...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov
Fc-D5h-F9-WAAAk-Jgp
12 posted on 09/07/2022 8:44:12 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Is NR going to blame Trump for this?


13 posted on 09/07/2022 8:49:30 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

After market baby parts are lucrative


14 posted on 09/07/2022 8:51:43 AM PDT by combat_boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ex gun maker.

Hmm, state lines, sexual/immoral purposes?
Can we say “Mann Act”?
Of course we can!


And who enforces the Mann Act? Why it’s the DOJ, which probably supports so-called gender-affirming treatments.

Do you see the DOJ threatening the Minneapolis School District/Teachers’ Union for an obvious violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act? Or the Berkeley Co-op that restricts where white people are allowed in their building?


15 posted on 09/07/2022 8:52:05 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Nah, because that law wouldn’t be any more valid than California’s law, which the courts will be striking down soon enough.


16 posted on 09/07/2022 9:00:38 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

Seriously. I don’t want to be around other peoples’ kids. Kids are mostly annoying. Unless they are my relatives, or you are going to pay me to put up with them, I’d rather not.

Anyone feeling differently, unless they are maybe a childless woman, I find suspect.


17 posted on 09/07/2022 9:02:49 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST

“express consent”

Perhaps you mean implied consent?


18 posted on 09/07/2022 9:05:22 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: karpov

“ It allows California courts to strip custody from parents — even parents who don’t live in California —“

If they think they can pass a law that gives California power over the people in any other state, they can all line up and kiss my lily white a$$.


19 posted on 09/07/2022 9:10:15 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

The government of California has in effect seceded from the human race.


20 posted on 09/07/2022 9:10:59 AM PDT by Salman (It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson