Without Trump-hating FBI agents and prosecutors there’s no case. Only the white-hot fury of Trump hate can make one.
Nothing extraordinary or unusually broad about it. Its the least she could do when confronted by a super corrupt, sleazy DOJ/FBI.
The MSM never says this about a liberal judge...............
On Monday, Judge Cannon granted Mr. Trump’s request to appoint an independent arbiter known as a special master to review materials seized last month from his private Florida club. The extraordinary and unusually broad decision, which could delay the criminal investigation into Mr. Trump, drew scrutiny from experts who questioned her legal reasoning and criticized some of the language in her opinion about what rights a former president is entitled to.
I’m not lawyer, but..............
What is so controversial, about the special master, who will review the documentation?
I understand it slows down this investigation into Trump, but, shouldn’t we all want proper legal procedures followed in any legal proceeding? Do the liberals oppose proper legal procedures, such as verifying the documents seized are the ones covered by the secret search warrant???
Or is this whole thing just political, in which case none of us are supposed to say anything????
Hmmm... Nothing about the extraordinarily broad search warrant that was nonetheless exceeded by the FBI in their zealous pursuit of "orange man bad".
From the excerpt, this is a hit piece.
Bias Alert: the judge's findings that laws were broken, FBI rulebook was tossed, the former President was treated worse than a drug lord, and that Biden started it should all be disregarded because she's only been on the federal bench for a couple of years and was appointed by Trump.
Suuuure...
“from his private Florida club. “
So It turns out Melania and Barron have no home they live in a “private club”.
Had she made a different decision in this case, she would have been hailed by the left as a woman of color, and praised for her diversity.
Well that is because of the unusually broad seizure of materials not specified in the warrant.
Whether this judge or another down the road, the question of equal treatment has to be raised. Has NARA and the DOJ also done a raid and inventory of the homes of Carter, Bush, Clinton, Obama?
“The extraordinary and unusually broad...”
Funny, I don’t recall the NYT saying that about the search warrant that “authorized” the FBI to seize everything, including Trump’s medical records, tax records, thousands of photographs, some of his clothes, and attorney-client materials.
From the article. “The extraordinary and unusually broad decision,...” That pretty much describes the warrant.
“.. The extraordinary and unusually broad decision, ..”
The only extraordinary and unusually broad decision was for a judge or magistrate to issue a search warrant against a former president of the US. That judge should go down in infamy.
I wonder if the NYT ever does profiles of Democratic appointed judges. Or maybe the Republican appointed judges are the only ones that, in the opinion of the NYT, aren’t qualified to practice law . . .
More experts.
I hate that stupid media phrase “raises eyebrows.”
Judge Robert’s chief of staff recently resigned. Was he the leaker?
I see that gAG Barr has an opinion on a case he learned about from MSM? How about the yeomans work you did burying the Franklin Scandal, where Boystown orphans were used in DC to be parking devices for those in power in DC, even the White House with GHWBoooosh. Or how his “best friend”Robert Muller was a fine man with a great mind, until we learn he is in a class with one other great mind...Joe Bai din.