I don't recall any of the accusations leveled against PDJT referred to as "claims" by anyone in the MSM.
Just as I don't recall the word "alleged" or "allegedly" being used in connection with even the most obviously ridiculous accusations against him.
Given that the raid was done AFTER the exclusion of Trump’s legal team AND given that the FBI/DoJ has admitted that they included Trump’s Passports with their takings, under any ordinary circumstance, this request would be an easy grant. Today? The animosity is thick as treacle and as sticky.
Bookmark
What a b.s headline. How about, Trump sues after rights violated by politicized DOJ?
“Special Master?” Is this Star Wars or S&M?
Like they haven’t made copies already...
I’m afraid their grubby fingerprints are all over every paper including post-it notes and Melania’s underthings (which have nose imprints).
They probably shared everything with Pelosi, Liz Cheney, Chuck U Schumer, Obama and Biden, from the day after the raid. And copy machines going full tilt.
That’s why all of Trump’s personal papers are so grimy.
I thought the media had declared the word “raid” for Mar-A-Lago as a silly right-winger incendiary term for it and that it was definitely positively not a raid. Did they get a new memo from the DNC?
“Trump suing to stall FBI probe after Mar-a-Lago raid”
Doesn’t get more biased than that.
Just heard that Biden, on April 11, 2023 rescinded Pres. Trumps executive privildge over the documents and, I think, Trumps team didn’t know. Somebody fill in the blanks on this one because I just heard it out of one ear as I walked past the tv.
Levin has reviewed the motion on his evening show. It’s a ‘general warrant’ prohibited by Constitutional law. This is all out war.
The Feds must have seized his documentation of the grand conspiracy against him by Comey and all the other plotters. There is no doubt in my mind he has more proof of the traiterous plan to overthrow the US government administered by Trump than Durham has.
As a non-lawyer I believe that per the 4th Amendment the Search Warrant sets the standard. The warrant states where and what the searchers can do. So if it not specified in the warrant, the GVT should not set the standard.
1. The property owner (or designated rep) if not arrested should have inherent rights to monitor the search, unless the warrant prohibits it.
2. Unless prohibited by the warrant, the entire search should be on video with GVT cams. Any existing owner video needs to be allowed.
As an aside, was Trump’s executive order downgrading classified for the Russian hoax and other presented as part of the subpoena justification provided to the judge? Failure to do that by the DOJ should be withholding evidence.
Anyplace else it is posted other than scribd?
I’m not going to pay scribd for a subscription.
More time is needed to keep the Congress critters from digging into his records to find any excuse to use against him. If he has issues let the nation decide, not self appointed geeks who give true geeks a bad name.
The right move by Trump. A Special Master is a trained attorney without a horse in the race and should be a neutral reviewer. Just the facts, folks. Just the facts!