Posted on 08/18/2022 1:56:36 PM PDT by fwdude
The media is all over the Southern Baptists for sexual sins, particularly child molestation, by its clergy. You’d think the Southern Baptists were especially evil. Yet, the desire to avoid besmirching their organization thrills through all institutions – from Hollywood, to Federal agencies, to universities, and beyond. The Southern Baptists acted like other institutions by hiding sexual dirt.
Part of the reason the media is so enraged with Southern Baptists is they exclude LGBTs from fostering, teaching, or caretaking kids: How dare the church enforce the historic belief that homosexuals seek sex with the underage when that belief is dead wrong? The American Psychiatric and American Psychological Associations and the National Association of Social Workers[1] plainly said in 1994 that “although gay men have been stigmatized with the allegation that they are disproportionately responsible for child sexual abuse, there is no evidence of any positive correlation between homosexual orientation and child molestation!”
Who is correct—the Southern Baptists or the media/mental health complex?
(Excerpt) Read more at renewamerica.com ...
"Who is correct—the Southern Baptists or the media/mental health complex?"
Three guesses... no, one.
Sodomites tend to be walking advertisements for their diseased and perverse lifestyle. Whether they lay hands on the child or not, the sodomite harms the child simply by being in the child’s presence.
Conclusion: Disproportionate molestations by homosexuals and their more frequent victimization of children dominated media reports of child sexual abuse. The media may dislike it, but by discriminating against using or hiring LGBTs, Southern Baptists likely saved many more children from being molested.These stories about child sexual abuse were written by (usually pro-LGBT) journalists and chosen by Google (also a pro-LGBT entity). Even with this potential bias, our 10-year set of news stories tends to reinforce traditional, historic church-based concerns about homosexuals’ sexual predation of children. Likewise, our set of 2,633 consecutive news stories also tends to falsify the contrary claims made by mental health/social work professional associations.
Nearly ALL homosexuals (men and female) have been molested themselves (most likely at an early age by someone they already knew). So yes, as they grow older, they carry on the tradition of molesting others.
Later in my young adult life, when I was in a period of deep depression over the loss of my dad and other crushing issues, a "Christian" psychologist I was seeing for help suggested I try a "gay" relationship with a colleague of his (I was considered a good looking young man and I had a girlfriend at the time known to the psychologist.) I never went back nor paid my bill. I felt violated.
Of the cases of abuse perpetrated by Catholic priests, roughly 80% of the victims were boys. It’s unlikely that 80% (or anything near 80%) of Catholic priests are or were homosexual. So at least in that set of cases, homosexuals *were* more likely than heterosexually-oriented men to molest children.
If you have an adult molesting a child of the same sex, you
essentially have a homosexual at work.
That’s the dirty little secret they avoid when the topic
comes up.
No, it’s a heterosexual crime. Ah, no it’s not.
Opposite sex, yes.
It’s the elephant in the room that we’re not allowed to talk about.
https://gab.com/groups/37667
See for yourself.
I post sexual Predators on GAB
Michael Reagan used to annoy the heck out of me when, on his show discussing his experiences in a foster home before the Reagans adopted him, he would angrily deny that gay men are more likely to molest little boys than are straight guys.
It defies common sense.
homosexuals do not reproduce, they recruit. And they do that by molestation.
“The Gay Report” a 1973 exhaustive survey done by two researchers who were homosexuals found that the vast majority of homosexuals had been molested by men (which by definition is homosexual behavior).
There is along history of homosexual organizations supporting and promoting men having sex with boys. The North American Man Boy Love Association was a welcome partner in most gay pride parades and events up until a few short years ago (and perhaps even today, I’ve lost track). Why would a larger group (homosexuals) welcome child molesters unless they saw nothing wrong with molestation?
When this all started some of us raised the slippery slope argument. Once you break on sexual taboo (in this case homosexual behavior) it becomes far easier to break others (such as child molestation). The more homosexuals you have the more boys will get molested.
Predators go to where the prey is. They know no boundaries.
Isn’t it the case that most of the homo art from civilizations undergoing moral decay involves young boys? I’ve heard that somewhere and guessed it’s probably true.
For the same reason robbers rob banks...
At this point I'm pretty sure we have a situation where degenerates go into the ministry, priesthood, whatever, as a way to get close to children.
This observation also applies to such secular professions as scoutmaster and schoolteacher.
A lot of good people do not realize just how degenerate it is out there.
Even when confronted with these statistics, gay advocates claim that gay molestation is really by pederasts or child abusers with access, and sexual orientation has nothing to do with it
Politically correct. All the "right" people told him it was true.
Exactly. The left is famous for altering definitions to achieve the result they want.
Now consider that only 2% of the adult population is homosexual. With child molestation rates by homosexuals this much higher consider how much more likely an average homosexual is to molest children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.