My brakes locked up on the first sentence of the second paragraph. The first thing that will have to be done is a Federal examination of the vote thefts once and for all, and an examination of all the judges that blocked all the court cases.
“. . . Trump’s false claim . . .” = whistling past the graveyard. They know the fraud, endorse the fraud, hide the fraud, and live the fraud.
Exactly, I am going to push for a blanket impeachment of every judged nominated by illegitimate Joe that did not receive 54 votes.
There are 4 US senators who who were clearly installed through fraud, those judges will need to be removed cart blanche who did not receive 54 votes.
That will send the signal to the Judiciary that they don’t get to play politics and ignore voter fraud.
Other recriminations will be needed, but that is the most important move to restore a free democratic republic.
The subtle lie in the article is “Widespread” voter fraud. The issue is significant fraud, not widespread. There may have been less than 10,000 people directly involved.
Words in this case are important The fraud was not widespread, but it was extremely significant.
getting close on the ballot destruction date unless the state extends it
they will be running to the incinerator
“My brakes locked up on the first sentence of the second paragraph.”
Yes. Calling them false is terrible journalism. Something like “controversial” would be accurate and nonjudgmental.
“Improbable” would be judgmental but less of a journalistic disaster than “false”.