Not a bad idea, or he could just cut to the chase.
Posted on 08/17/2022 6:53:40 PM PDT by cotton1706
The 2022 primary season is nearly over, but already one thing is clear: former President Donald Trump won.
Candidates who support Trump’s false claim of widespread fraud in the 2020 election have won big in key swing states, and candidates he backed to challenge the 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach him following the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol have been mostly successful.
“This was a referendum on the never ending Witch Hunt,” Trump wrote in a post on his social network Tuesday after his endorsed candidate Harriet Hageman beat out Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., who voted for impeachment. “The people have spoken!”
Trump began endorsing candidates last year at a more aggressive pace than he did in the previous campaign. He’s backed 235 candidates for the 2022 midterm compared with 183 in 2020, according to Ballotpedia.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
That’s an old pic. No pustules.
The grin suggests that, indeed.
Don’t gag orders usually only pertain to talking about the court case?
The dems don’t necessarily need to mess with the machine software. They can probably get what they need old school style in selective locations.
Yeah - they deal with us by dealing with their poll workers in the hood.
Now for the hard part especially the senate. Oz needs a major overhaul especially after his elitist grocery store video. Walker needs to make a policy speech. Johnson needs to do some deep venting on his democrat opponent. And the rest need to work their tail off.
Exactly, I am going to push for a blanket impeachment of every judged nominated by illegitimate Joe that did not receive 54 votes.
There are 4 US senators who who were clearly installed through fraud, those judges will need to be removed cart blanche who did not receive 54 votes.
That will send the signal to the Judiciary that they don’t get to play politics and ignore voter fraud.
Other recriminations will be needed, but that is the most important move to restore a free democratic republic.
The subtle lie in the article is “Widespread” voter fraud. The issue is significant fraud, not widespread. There may have been less than 10,000 people directly involved.
Words in this case are important The fraud was not widespread, but it was extremely significant.
Liar!
The author looks like the sort of guy who’s at risk of getting monkeypox.
“But they still have to deal with us.”
What exactly are we going to do if they indict Trump and lock him up??
Schwartz or Schwanz?
Could imply both, what with “schwarz” meaning “black” and “schwanz” literally meaning “tail”.
That’s cool but der kleine führer is still running the streets of the District of Corruption.
whats the score?
hows pence doing on endorsements?
explains the perpetual scowl on liz cheney’s face
“What exactly are we going to do if they indict Trump and lock him up?”
Indict - maybe. I would not rule it out. Lock up? That would only come into play upon a conviction and exhausted legal appeals ending in the SC.
The dems seem quite committed so I would not rule out they try to convict Trump of some nonsense. I really don’t see a significant downside for the dems in pursuing this. There is not that much pushback from Republican politicians. Even if the pubs win the House the most I could see them doing is trying to impeach the AG but I would be surprised if they pulled it off.
There was a downside for Liz but who cares about her?
Definite soy boy.
getting close on the ballot destruction date unless the state extends it
they will be running to the incinerator
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.