Skip to comments.
On June 22, the Trump Organization...received a subpoena for surveillance footage from cameras at Mar-a-Lago.
Byronyork WSJ ^
Posted on 08/10/2022 7:50:54 PM PDT by janetjanet998
'On June 22, the Trump Organization...received a subpoena for surveillance footage from cameras at Mar-a-Lago. That footage was turned over, according to an official.' From @WSJ
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 202206; 20220622; creepstate; deepstate; mal; maralago; policestate; singlepartystate; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: janetjanet998
I’m sure they will comply, after they make 20 copies and distribute them to media outlets.
2
posted on
08/10/2022 7:52:16 PM PDT
by
Not A Snowbird
(I do not recognize Biden’s authority. )
To: janetjanet998
3
posted on
08/10/2022 7:52:21 PM PDT
by
Sarcazmo
("Sarcasm is the highest form of wit" ~ O. Wilde)
To: janetjanet998
surveillance footage from cameras at Mar-a-Lago That seems like a very odd request.
4
posted on
08/10/2022 7:52:25 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(We are already in a revolutionary period, and the Rule of Law means nothing. It's "whatever".)
To: janetjanet998
I hope the Trump team made copies!
5
posted on
08/10/2022 7:52:41 PM PDT
by
Fai Mao
To: janetjanet998
John Solomon just reported there was a grand jury subpoena in June for some of these documents and Trump didn’t challenge it
turned over 15 Boxes
To: ClearCase_guy
surveillance footage from cameras at Mar-a-Lago
That seems like a very odd request.
If you want to plant evidence, it's nice to know the camera coverage
7
posted on
08/10/2022 7:54:26 PM PDT
by
rdcbn1
To: ClearCase_guy
That seems like a very odd request. Harassment and fishing expedition.
8
posted on
08/10/2022 7:54:58 PM PDT
by
libertylover
(Our biggest problem, BY FAR, is that almost all of big media is agenda-driven, not-truth driven.)
To: rdcbn1
If you want to plant evidence, it’s nice to know the camera coverage
Maybe that’s why they wanted the camera’s turned off during the raid
To: janetjanet998
Sounds like they were scoping the place out.
Between floor plans which I’m sure they could get their hands on and camera footage, they would know a lot about their target.
I wonder what reason was given for the Jun 22 subpoena?
10
posted on
08/10/2022 7:56:48 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: ClearCase_guy
Could have been the cam footage of the secure basement storage to see who had been accessing it. If this is really about the National Archives records dispute.
11
posted on
08/10/2022 7:57:19 PM PDT
by
Valpal1
(Not even the police are safe from the police!!!)
To: janetjanet998
what were the dates covered by the subpoena and what reason was given?
To: janetjanet998
13
posted on
08/10/2022 8:00:40 PM PDT
by
elpadre
(W )
To: Valpal1
Could have been the cam footage of the secure basement storage to see who had been accessing it. If this is really about the National Archives records dispute.
—
That is possible and could be why they asked for the extra locks
To: Sarcazmo
Maybe they wanted the layout for some practice runs?
To: janetjanet998
This just gets more and more unbelievable.
16
posted on
08/10/2022 8:08:11 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(The Democrat Party is criminal, unAmerican and illegitimate )
To: janetjanet998
17
posted on
08/10/2022 8:08:41 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(The Lord, The Christ and The Messiah: Jesus Christ of Nazareth - http://www.BiblicalJesusChrist.Com/)
To: ClearCase_guy
18
posted on
08/10/2022 8:08:58 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(The Lord, The Christ and The Messiah: Jesus Christ of Nazareth - http://www.BiblicalJesusChrist.Com/)
To: Valpal1
Yeah, I bet that is what it was...
Or also could have been something insanely worse, like it appears to be.
19
posted on
08/10/2022 8:11:41 PM PDT
by
Sarcazmo
("Sarcasm is the highest form of wit" ~ O. Wilde)
To: janetjanet998
Use the Epstein defense:
Cameras #1 - 59 were malfunctioning during the requested times.
20
posted on
08/10/2022 8:12:56 PM PDT
by
Fireone
(When they pry them from my cold, dead, unvaccinated hands.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson